BeattyB. (2012). The debate over the young “disadvantaged child”: Preschool intervention, developmental psychology, and compensatory education in the 1960s and early 1970s. Teachers College Record, 114(6).
2.
BeattyB., & ZiglerE. (2012). Reliving the history of compensatory education: Policy choices, bureaucracy, and the politicized role of science in the evolution of Head Start. Teachers College Record, 114(6).
3.
FoleyD. E. (1997). Deficit thinking based on culture: The anthropological protest. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 113–131). Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London: Falmer Press.
4.
HerrnsteinR. J., & MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life.New York: Free Press.
5.
HuntJ. M. (1964). The psychological basis for using preschool enrichment as an antidote for cultural deprivation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior Development, 10, 249–264.
6.
JensenA. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.
7.
LynnR., & VanhanenT. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations.Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
MartinezS. L. M., & RuryJ. L. (2012). From “culturally deprived” to “at risk”: The politics of popular expression and educational inequality in the United States, 1960–1985. Teachers College Record, 114(6).
9.
MenchacaM. (1997). Early racist discourses: Roots of deficit thinking. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 13–40). Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London: Falmer Press.
10.
NogueraP. A. (2009). The achievement gap: Public crisis in education. New Labor Forum, 18, 61–69.
11.
ReynoldsA. R., TempleJ. A., OuS.-R., ArteagaI. A., & WhiteB. A. B. (2011, June 9). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: Effects of timing, dosage, and subgroups. Science Express. Retrieved from http://www.scienceexpress.org/
12.
RothsteinR. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap.New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
ShueyA. M. (1958). The testing of Negro intelligence.Lynchburg, VA: J. P. Bell.
14.
SpencerJ. P. (2012). From “cultural deprivation” to cultural capital: The roots and continued relevance of compensatory education. Teachers College Record, 114(6).
15.
SwadenerB. B., & LubeckS. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk.Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
TermanL. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
ValenciaR. R. (Ed.). (1997a). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London: Falmer Press.
18.
ValenciaR. R. (1997b). Genetic pathology model of deficit thinking. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 41–112). Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London: Falmer Press.
19.
ValenciaR. R. (2010), Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Critical Educator Series. New York: Routledge.
20.
ValenciaR. R. (2012). Students of color and the achievement gap: Systemic challenges, systemic transformations. Book manuscript in progress.
21.
ValenciaR. R., & SolórzanoD. G. (1997). Contemporary deficit thinking. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 160–210). Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London: Falmer Press