Literacy has been traditionally posited as a primary educational goal. The concept is now understood in the literature as extending way beyond the mere technicalities of proficiency in reading and writing, encompassing a broad range of skills and practices related to comprehension, communication, and the ability to use texts in multiple settings. Cultural literacy and critical literacy are two conceptual models frequently used to understand the essence of literacy and why it is a worthy educational goal. Each model prescribes different curricular goals and preferred teaching practice in educational settings spanning all disciplines and age groups. In this article, we suggest a third conceptual model, identity literacy, based in developmental psychology's concept of identity. We define identity literacy as readers’ proficiency and willingness to engage the meaning systems embedded within texts and to consider adopting them as part of their own personal meaning system—that system within which they define themselves and their relation to the world. Setting identity literacy as a goal of teaching frames the practice of teaching texts differently than the other models.
Focus of Study
The concept emerged from a qualitative study focusing on high school teachers who primarily teach texts in the classroom. The study examined their goals and justifications for their chosen practices of teaching texts and examined these in light of extant literature regarding literacy, and the literature on identity development.
Setting and Participants
Twelve expert teachers of the curricular subject of Jewish thought taught in the Israeli nonreligious school sector served as the empirical foundation for developing the concept.
Research Design
Qualitative methodology was used to explore teachers’ ideas regarding teaching texts. Teachers were interviewed twice: once regarding their life story, reasons for becoming a teacher, and general goals in teaching, and once after they were observed teaching, regarding their reflections on the practices they employed in teaching texts. Common themes were identified using techniques based in grounded theory analysis.
Findings/Results
Three themes regarding teachers’ ideas on the proper way to teach texts emerged from the analysis: Good textual study is potentially personally meaningful; good teaching accentuates the potential of texts to trigger identity processes in the reader; and for students to learn to read in this manner, a particular stance toward texts needs to be taught.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The concept of identity literacy is suggested as an alternative conceptual lens with which to frame the purpose and practice of teaching texts in the classroom that may be relevant to teachers in a broad range of school disciplines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderI. E. (1988). Personality, psychological assessment, and psychobiography. Journal of Personality, 56(1), 265–294.
2.
BallA. F. (2000). Empowering pedagogies that enhance the learning of multicultural students. Teachers College Record, 102, 1006–1034.
3.
BambergM. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory and Psychology, 21, 3–24.
4.
BanksJ. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In BanksJ. A. & BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 3–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BarberB., EcclesJ., & StoneM. (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 429–455.
6.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD., HamiltonM., & IvanicR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). New York: Routledge.
7.
BrownL. M., ArgyrisD., AttanucciJ., BardigeB., GilliganC., JohnstonK., . (1988). A guide to reading narratives of conflict and choice for self and moral voice. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
8.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
10.
CôtéJ. E. (1996). Identity: A multidimensional approach. In AdamsG. R., MontemayorR., & GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 130–180). London: Sage.
11.
CôtéJ. E., & LevineC. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
EdwardsJ., & MarlandP. (1984). What are students really thinking?Educational Leadership, 42(3), 63–67.
13.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crises.New York: Norton.
14.
FivushR., HadenC. A., & ReeseE. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77, 1568–1588.
15.
FlumH., & KaplanA. (2006). Exploratory orientation as an educational goal. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 99–110.
16.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
17.
FreireP., & MacedoD. P. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Critical Studies in Education Series. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
18.
Galili-SchachterI. (2009). Hermeneutics in teaching: The case of the teaching of Jewish thought. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
19.
Galili-SchachterI., & SchachterE. P. (in press). The educational ethos of teachers of Jewish thought in Israeli non-religious schools: Literacy in the service of identity exploration and formation. In RichY., KatzY., MevarechZ., & OhayonS. (Eds.), Perspectives on Jewish literacy and education.Bethesda: University Press of Maryland.
20.
GallagherS. (1992). Hermeneutics and education.Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
GeeJ. P. (1989). What is literacy?Journal of Education, 171, 18–25.
22.
GeeJ. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.London: Routledge.
23.
GirouxH. A. (2002). Rethinking cultural politics and radical pedagogy in the work of Antonio Gramsci. In BorgC., ButtigiegJ., & MayoP. (Eds.), Gramsci and education (pp. 41–66). Oxford, England: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
25.
GrotevantH. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203–222.
26.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
HirschE. D.Jr. (Ed.). (1993). What your first grader needs to know: Fundamentals of a good first-grade education. New York: Delta.
28.
HoggM. A. (2003). Social identity. In LearyM. R. & TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479). New York: Guilford Press.
29.
IramY., & SchmidaM. (1998). The educational system of Israel. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
30.
JacobsV. (2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 7–39, 278.
31.
KazemekF. E., & RiggP. (2002). Literacy definitions. In GuzzettiB. J. (Ed.), Literacy in America: An encyclopedia of history, theory and practice (pp. 310–313). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
KelchtermansG. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 257–272.
34.
KendallJ. S., & MarzanoR. J. (2004). Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K–12 education. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
35.
KincheloeJ. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer. New York: Peter Lang.
36.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age.London: Routledge.
37.
Lannegrand-WillemsL., & BosmaH. (2006). Identity development-in-context: The school as an important context for identity development. Identity, 6, 85–113.
38.
LaugkschR. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.
39.
LewisJ., & RitchieJ. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In RitchieJ. & LewisJ. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 263–286). London: Sage.
McAdamsD. P. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford Press.
42.
McLeanK. C., & PrattM. W. (2006). Life's little (and big) lessons: Identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 42, 714–722.
43.
MishlerE. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.
44.
MojeE. B. (2000). “To be part of the story”: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102, 651–690.
45.
MojeE. B. (2002). Re-framing adolescent literacy research for new times: Studying youth as a resource. Reading Research and Instruction, 41, 211–228.
46.
MullisI. V. S., KennedyA. M., MartinM. O., & SainsburyM. (2006). PIRLS 2006 assessment framework and specifications (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
47.
MullisI. V. S., MartinM. O., & FoyP. (2008) TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
48.
NewmanB. M., & NewmanP. R. (2001). Group identity and alienation: Giving the We its due. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 515–538.
49.
OlsonD. R. (2009). Literacy, literacy policy and the school. In OlsonD. R. & TorranceN. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
SchachterE. P. (2004). Identity configurations: A new perspective on identity formation in contemporary society. Journal of Personality72, 167–200.
57.
SchachterE. P. (2005a). Erikson meets the postmodern: Can classic identity theory rise to the challenge?Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5, 137–160.
58.
SchachterE. P. (2005b). Context and identity formation: A theoretical analysis and a case study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 375–395.
59.
SchachterE.P. (2011). Narrative identity construction as a goal oriented endeavor: Reframing the issue of “Big vs. Small” story research. Theory and Psychology, 21(1), 107–113.
60.
SchachterE. P., & MarshallS. K. (2010). Identity agents: A focus on those purposefully involved in the identity of others. Identity, 10(2), 71–75.
61.
SchachterE. P. & RichY. (2011). Identity Education: A new conceptual framework for researchers and practitioners. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 222–238.
62.
SchachterE. P., & VenturaJ. J. (2008). Identity agents: Parents as active and reflective participants in their children's identity formation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 449–476.
63.
SchefflerI. (1973). Reason and teaching. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
64.
SchwartzS. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity, 1(1), 7–58.
65.
ScribnerS. (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education, 93, 6–21.
66.
SelberS. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
ShkediA. (2005). Multiple case narrative: A qualitative approach to studying multiple populations. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
69.
ShkediA., & HarelM. (2004). Second-order theoretical analysis of observations: Data analysis through the study of dilemmas. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18, 158–178.
SingerJ. A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning-making across the adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 72, 437–459.
72.
SnowdenA. A. (1907). The industrial improvement schools of Wuerttemberg. Teachers College Record, 8, 357–371.
73.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
74.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
StreetB. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice.New York: Cambridge University Press.
76.
StreetB. (1993). Introduction: The new literacy studies. In StreetB. (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1–21). New York: Cambridge University Press.
77.
StreetB. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education.London: Longman.
78.
StreetB. (2003). What's “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1–14.
79.
StrübingJ. (2007). Research as pragmatic problem solving: The pragmatist roots of empirically grounded theorising. In BryantA. & CharmazK. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 580–601). London: Sage.
80.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
81.
ThorneA., McLeanK. C., & LawrenceA. M. (2004). When remembering is not enough: Reflecting on self-defining memories in late adolescence. Journal of Personality, 72, 513–542.
82.
UNESCO. (2004). The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programmes: UNESCO Education sector position paper. Paris: Author.
83.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi, India: Sage.
84.
WalstadW. B. (2001). Economic education in U.S. high schools. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 195–210.
85.
WarschauerM. (2007). Information literacy in the laptop classroom. Teachers College Record, 109, 2511–2540.
86.
ZarcadoolasC., PleasantA. F., & GreerD. S. (2006). Advancing health literacy: A framework for understanding and action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
ZirkelS. (2008). The influence of multicultural educational practices on student outcomes and intergroup relations. Teachers College Record, 110, 1147–1181.
