Conducted in the fourth-largest urban center in the United States, this research depicts how different reform initiatives were introduced to one middle school context over the decade from 1999 to 2009.
Purposes/Objectives/Research Question/Focus of Study
The study focuses on teachers’ experiences of three reform endeavors and how tensions in teacher knowledge and community developed as a consequence of each. The study's overall purpose is to contribute the often-overlooked teacher perspective to the curriculum, teaching, and school reform literatures.
Setting
The setting for the research is a middle school located in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the United States. The campus's social narrative history parallels the city's development. The school currently serves some of America's richest and poorest youth.
Population/Participants/Subjects
Nineteen educators, including several main teacher participants as well as some supporting teacher and administrator participants, contributed anonymously to the narrative account.
Research Design
Narrative inquiry is the research method used to excavate a story serial that emerged during the longitudinal research study. Four interpretive devices—broadening, burrowing, storying and restorying, and fictionalization—aided in the comparison and contrast of three eruptions in teacher community that occurred as a result of the different reform emphases. Presented in story serial form, these eruptions suggest a rhythm to school reform. The article ends with a discussion of the value of narrative inquiry in studying phenomena at the interstices of teacher knowledge, teacher community, school milieu, and organized school reform. Connections between fine- and coarse-grained inquiries are made, and the notion of stories traveling from one school site to another is also probed. Finally, the idea of a perennial educational problem being made public and visible through an innovative research approach is taken up, along with some suggestions concerning how school reform could more productively be lived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleM. (1990). Is there a curriculum voice to reclaim?Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 526–530.
2.
AyersW. (1992). In the country of the blind: Telling our stories. In SchubertW. & AyersW. (Eds.), Teacher lore: Learning from our own experiences (pp. 154–158), New York, NY: Longman.
3.
BageG., GrosvenorJ., & WilliamsM. (1999). Curriculum planning: Prediction or response?: A case-study of teacher planning conducted through partnership action research. Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 49–69.
4.
Ben-PeretzM. (2009). Policy-making in education: A holistic approach in response to global changes.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BergerP., & LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of knowledge. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.New York, NY: Anchor.
6.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CarrD. (1986). Time, narrative, and history.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
ClandininD. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action.Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
9.
ClandininD. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In RussellT. & MunbyH. (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 124–137). London, England: Falmer Press.
10.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In JacksonP. W. (Ed.), Handbook of curriculum (pp. 363–461). New York, NY: Macmillan.
11.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
ClandininD. J., HuberJ., HuberM., MurphyS., Murray OrrA., PearceM., & SteevesP. (2006). Composing diverse identities: Narrative inquiries into the interwoven lives of children and teachers.New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
ColesR. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
ConleC. (1996). Resonance in preservice teacher inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 137–152.
16.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
18.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (2005). Narrative inquiry. In GreenJ., CamilliG., & ElmoreP. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp. 477–489). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19.
CraigC. (1995a). Knowledge communities: A way of making sense of how beginning teachers come to know. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(2), 151–175.
20.
CraigC. (1995b). Safe places in the professional knowledge landscapes. In ClandininD. J. & ConnellyF. M. (Eds.), Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes (pp. 137–141). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
CraigC. (2001a). The relationships between and among teacher knowledge, communities of knowing, and top down school reform: A case of “the monkey's paw.”Curriculum Inquiry, 31(3), 303–331.
22.
CraigC. (2001b). Rejoinder, no satisfaction: Top-down school reform and the conduit. Curriculum Inquiry, 31(3), 341–350.
23.
CraigC. (2007). Story constellations: A narrative approach to situating teachers’ knowledge of school reform in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 173–188.
24.
CraigC. (2009). Research in the midst of organized school reform: Tensions in teacher community. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 598–619.
25.
CraigC., & HuberJ. (2006). Research reverberations: Shaping and reshaping narrative inquiries in the midst of storied lives and contexts. In Jean ClandininD. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
CraigC. & RossV. (2008). Cultivating teachers as curriculum makers. In ConnellyF. M. C. (Ed.), Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 282–305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
CzarniawkaB. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
DeweyJ. (1929). Experience and nature (2nd ed.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
29.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education.New York, NY: Macmillan.
30.
DowneyC. A., & ClandininD. J. (2010). Narrative inquiry as reflective practice: Tensions and possibilities. Handbook of reflection and reflective practice: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 385–400). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
DuFourR. (2001, Winter). In the right context. Journal of Staff Development, 14–17.
32.
DuFourR. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
33.
DuFourR., & EakerR. E. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.Washington, DC: ASCD/National Education Services.
34.
Elbaz-LuwischF. (2006). Studying teachers’ lives and experiences: Narrative inquiry into K–12 teaching. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 357–382). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
GoodsonI. (1994). Studying curriculum.Buckingham, England: Open University.
36.
HargreavesA. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
HargreavesA. (2003). Teaching in a knowledge society: Education in an age of uncertainty.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
HeilbrunC. (1988). Writing a woman's life.New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
39.
KelchertermansG. (2007). Teachers’ self-understanding in times of performativity. In DeretchinL. F. & CraigC. (Eds.), International research on the impact of accountability systems. (pp. 13–30). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
KermodeF. (2000). The sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction with a new epilogue.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
LangM., OlsonJ., HansenH., & BünderW. (Eds.). (1999). Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism.Louvain, Belgium: Garant.
42.
MacIntyreA. (1985). After virtue.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
43.
MishlerE. (1990). Validity in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415–442.
44.
NovakN. (1975). ‘Story’ and experience. In J. B. Wiggins (Ed.), Religion as story (pp. 175–200). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
45.
OlsonJ. (2002). Systemic change/teacher tradition: Legends of reform continue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 129–137.
46.
OlsonJ., & LangM. (2008). Is there light as well as heat?: Teachers and the system. In KentelJ. A. & ShortA. (Eds.), Totems and taboos: Risk and relevance in research on teachers and teaching (pp. 97–111). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
47.
OlsonM. (1995). Conceptualizing narrative authority: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2), 119–135.
48.
OlsonM., & CraigC. (2009a). Travelling stories: Converging milieus and educative conundrums. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1077–1085.
49.
OlsonM., & CraigC. (2009b). “Small” stories and meganarratives: Accountability in balance. Teacher's College Record, 111(2), 547–572.
50.
PolkinghorneD. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences.Albany: State University of New York.
51.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York, NY: Basic Books.
52.
SchwabJ. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In SchwabJ. J. & BrandweinP. (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
SchwabJ. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1–23.
54.
SchwabJ. (1970). The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
55.
SchwabJ. (1978a). Eros and education: A discussion of one aspect of discussion. In WestburyI. & WilkofN. (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 105–132). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1954)
56.
SchwabJ. (1978b). The practical: A language for curriculum. In WestburyI. & WilkofN. (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 365–381). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1969)
57.
SetterfieldD. (2006). The thirteenth tale.New York, NY: Atrea Books.
58.
SpenceD. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical method.New York, NY: Norton.
59.
TyackD., & CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of school reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
WolcottH. (2003). Teachers vs. technocrats: An educational innovation in anthropologic perspective.Lanham, MD: Altamira. (Original work published in 1973)
61.
WoodD. (2007). Teachers’ learning communities: Catalyst for change or new infrastructure for the status quo?Teachers College Record, 109(3), 699–717.
