“Everybody Grieves,but Still Nobody Sees”: Toward a Praxis of Recognition for Latina/o Students in U.S. Schools

Abstract

Background/Context

The academic success and failure of low-income youth, and Black and Latina/o youth in particular, has received significant attention in the educational literature, particularly in relation to school dropout. Over the last decade, several studies have demonstrated that student–teacher relationships, committed teachers, and notions of caring are critical to the success of Latina/o youth. However, high-poverty urban schools are graduating fewer than half of their students, in comparison with about 70% at the national level. There remains a scant body of research, policy, and conceptual frameworks to help address the crisis, popularly deemed the “dropout crisis,” particularly among Latinas/os, the youngest, fastest growing, and lowest educated group in the United States.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

In what ways can and should researchers, practitioners, and policy makers recognize the existence of Latina/o youth? The purpose of the article, contextualized in the theoretical and empirical literature, is to problematize the concept of recognition, particularly for Latina/o youth, and introduce a conceptual framework to understand, examine, and help rectify the crisis facing this population.

Research Design

In this conceptual paper, I argue that key stakeholders must recognize the existence of the Latina/o youth by acknowledging their human existence through legitimizing the unequal conditions and struggles they face in school. Educators much engage youth in curricular and pedagogical experiences that seek to raise students’ consciousness through critical thinking and dialogue. This article is focused on the human and interpersonal actions and processes that are necessary to facilitate agency and change among students. Theoretical origins informing recognition are discussed, followed by a contextualized analysis of recognition within the present-day conditions of U.S. schools, particularly for Latina/o youth. I then propose five pedagogies of recognition: relational recognition, curricular recognition, pedagogical recognition, contextualizing recognition, and transformative recognition. Each form of recognition is situated in the relevant literature.

Conclusions/Recommendations

This article argues that the proposed pedagogies of recognition need to be enacted to foster the intellectual, academic, and political development of youth, particularly Latina/o youth. Recognition can help educators and scholars understand how the social, political, and economic conditions impact Latina/o youth and helps educators reframe the conceptual bases of their work by challenging them to interrogate the (in)effectiveness of institutional and classroom-level practices. The ultimate goal is to help educators and researchers reconstruct and redefine the purpose of education for Latina/o youth in U.S. schools.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advancement Project. (2006, Spring). Arresting development: Addressing the school discipline crisis in Florida. Report prepared by Florida State Conference NAACP, Advancement Project, NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund.

Andersson

(2000). The situated politics of recognition: Ethnic minority, youth and identity work. London: University of London.

Anyon

(1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

Anyon

(2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.

Anzaldua

(1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

Apple

(1995). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Bartolomé

(1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173–194.

Bartolomé

(2002). Creating and equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, border crossers, and cultural brokers. In Beykont

Z. F.

(Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference (pp. 167–191). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.

Bingham

(2006). Before recognition, and after: The educational critique. Educational Theory, 56, 325–344.

10.

Bowles

, & Gintis

(1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Brown

(2007). Lost and turned out: Academic, social, and emotional experiences of students excluded from school. Urban Education, 42, 432–454.

12.

Brown

T. M.

, & Rodriguez

L. F.

(2008). School and the co-construction of dropout. International Journal for Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 221–242.

13.

Bryk

A. S.

, & Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

14.

Calabrese

R. L.

, & Poe

(1990). Alienation: An explanation of high dropout rates among African American and Latino students. Educational Research Quarterly, 14(4), 22–26.

15.

Cammarota

, & Romero

(2006). A critically compassionate intellectualism for Latina/o students: Raising voices above the silencing in our schools. Multicultural Education, 14(1), 2–10.

16.

Conchas

G. Q.

(2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino school engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 475–504.

17.

Conchas

G. Q.

, & Rodriguez

L. F.

(2008). Small schools and urban youth: Using the power of school culture to engage students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

18.

de los Reyes

, & Gozemba

P. A.

(2001). Pockets of hope: How students and teachers change the world. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

19.

Delpit

(1996). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.

20.

Duncan-Andrade

, & Morrell

(2009). The art of critical pedagogy. Possibilities of moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.

21.

Du Bois

W. E. B.

(1903). The souls of Black folk. Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Co.

22.

Fanon

(1963). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.

23.

Fanon

(1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.

24.

Fine

(1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school. Teachers College Record, 87, 393–409.

25.

Fine

(1987). Silencing in public schools. Language Arts, 64, 157–174.

26.

Fine

(1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.

27.

Fine

, Roberts

R. A.

, & Torre

M. E.

(with Bloom

, Burns

, Chajet

, & Guishard

, & Payne

) (2004). Echoes of Brown: Youth documenting and performing the legacy of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

28.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

29.

Freire

(1996). Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. New York: Routledge.

30.

Fry

(2003). Hispanic youth dropping out of U.S. schools: Measuring the challenge. Retrieved from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/19.pdf

31.

Hegel

G. W. F.

(1910). The phenomenology of the mind. New York: Macmillan.

32.

Honneth

(1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

33.

Hooks

. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

34.

Kozol

(2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown Press.

35.

Ladson-Billings

(2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In Denzin

& Lincoln

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 257–277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

36.

Lauria

, & Mirón

L. F.

(2005). Urban schools: The new social spaces of resistance. New York: Peter Lang.

37.

Lipman

(2005). High-stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and school reform. New York: Routledge/Falmer.

38.

Macedo

(1994). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

39.

Meier

, & Wood

(2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and schools. Boston: Beacon Press.

40.

Mirón

L. F.

(1996). The social construction of urban schooling: Situating the crisis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

41.

Moll

L. C.

, Amanti

, Neff

, & Gonzalez

(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.

42.

Mosqueda

(2007). English proficiency, tracking, and the mathematics achievement of Latino English learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.

43.

Nieto

(1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.

44.

Noddings

(1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

45.

Noguera

P. A.

(1996). Confronting the urban in urban school reform. Urban Review, 28(1), 1–19.

46.

Noguera

P. A.

(2003). City school and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York: Teachers College Press.

47.

Normore

A. H.

(2006). From a pivotal civil rights activist to radical equations: Grassroots leadership and lessons for educational leaders. A conversation with Robert Moses. UCEA Review, University Council of Educational Administration, 68(1), 19–22.

48.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

49.

Oakes

, & Rogers

(2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York: Teachers College Press.

50.

Orfield

(2004). Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.

51.

Orfield

, Losen

, Wald

, & Swanson

(2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Contributors: Urban Institute, Advocates for Children of New York, and the Civil Society Institute.

52.

Pianta

R. C.

, Stuhlman

M. W.

, & Hamre

B. K.

(2002). How schools can do better: Fostering stronger connections between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 93, 91–107.

53.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2004). Latinos and school reform: Voice, action, and agency. ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America, 3(2), 38–39.

54.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2005a). Struggling to recognize their existence: The battle for recognition in two urban high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.

55.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2005b). Yo, mister! An alternative urban high school offers lessons on respect. Educational Leadership, 62(7), 78–80.

56.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2008a). Struggling to recognize their existence: Student-adult relationships in the urban high school context. Urban Review, 40, 436–453.

57.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2008b). “Teachers know you can do more”: Manufacturing deliberate cultures of success for urban high school students. Educational Policy, 22, 758–780.

58.

Rodriguez

L. F.

(2009). Over-coming test prep pedagogy: Getting urban high school students to educate pre-service teachers using liberatory pedagogy. The Sophist's Bane: The Journal of The Society of Professors of Education.

59.

Rodriguez

L. F.

, & Brown

T. M

(2009). Engaging youth in participatory action research for education and social transformation. New Directions for Youth Development, 123, 19–34.

60.

Rogers

E. M.

(1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.

61.

Rumberger

R. W.

(2001, January). Why students drop out of school and what can be done. Paper presented at the conference Dropouts in America: How Severe Is the Problem? What Do We Know About Intervention and Prevention? Cambridge, MA. Sponsored by Achieve, Inc., and the Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.

62.

Solórzano

(1989). Teaching and social change: Reflections on a Freirean approach in a college classroom. Teaching Sociology, 17, 218–225.

63.

Solórzano

(1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24, 5–19.

64.

Solórzano

, & Delgado Bernal

(2001). Critical race theory, transformational resistance and social justice: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342.

65.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

(2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York: Teachers College Press.

66.

Taylor

(1994). The politics of recognition. In Goldberg

D. T.

(Ed.), Multiculturalism: A critical reader (pp. 75–106). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

67.

Urrieta

Jr . (2003). Las identidades también lloran/identities also cry: Exploring the human side of Latina/o indigenous identities. Educational Studies, 34, 147–168.

68.

Valencia

, & Solórzano

(1997). Contemporary deficit thinking. In Valencia's

(Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking in educational thought and practice (pp. 160–210). New York: Falmer Press.

69.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.

70.

Van Manen

(1996). The pedagogy of recognition. Retrieved from http://www.phenomenol-ogyonline.com/max/projects/hsrecogn.html

71.

Walker

V. S.

(1996). Can institutions care? Evidence from the segregated school of African American children. In Shujaa

M. J.

(Ed.), Beyond desegregation: The quality of African American schooling (pp. 209–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

72.

Wehlage

G. G.

, & Rutter

R. A.

(1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 374–392.

73.

Woodson

(1933). The miseducation of the Negro. Washington, DC: Associated Publishers.

74.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.

75.

Young

I. M.

(1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.