Abdal-HaqqI. (1999, February). The professional development school movement: Is there a clear destination? Purpose, responsibility, and accountability in PDS work. Paper presented at the Professional Development School National Conference annual meeting, Kansas City, MO.
2.
BerryB., & BuxtonJ. B. (2000). Teaching quality in the Southeast: A call for regional action Retrieved May 5, 2010, from http://www.teachingquality.org
BovensM. (2005). Public accountability. In FerlieE., LynneL., & PollittC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–208). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
CastleS., & ReillyK. A. (2011). Impact of professional development school preparation on teacher candidates. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
6.
CroutA., & WashburnS. (2000). Our NCATE report card: A partnership for excellence. Educational Forum, 64(2), 156–164.
7.
CubanL. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 341–344.
8.
DanaN. F., Yendol-HoppeyD., & Snow-GeronoJ. (2006). Deconstructing inquiry in the professional development school: Exploring the domains and contents of teachers’ questions. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 59–71.
9.
Darling-HammondL. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 59–80.
10.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 7801 (2001).
11.
FieldB., NeapolitanJ., PitroloP., OliverC., WestfallM., & Yendol-HoppeyD. (2010, March). A multi-lens approach to PDS formative evaluation: Serving as critical friends for one another to strengthen our work. Presentation at the Professional Development Schools National Conference, Orlando, FL.
12.
FullanM. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
GillB., & HoveA. (2000). The Benedum Collaborative Model of Teacher Education: A preliminary evaluation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
15.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Author.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004). P.L. 108-446. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://idea.ed.gov/
17.
LevineM. (Ed.). (1992). Professional practice schools: Linking teacher education and school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
LevineM., & ChurinsE. J. (1999). Designing standards that empower professional development schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(3&4), 178–208.
19.
LevineM., & TrachtmanR. (Eds.). (2005). Implementing PDS standards: Stories from the field. Washington, DC: NCATE.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
MulganR. (2003). Holding power to account. Accountability in modern democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
National Association for Professional Development Schools. (2008). What it means to be a professional development school: A statement by the executive council and board of directors of the National Association for Professional Development Schools. School-University Partnerships, 2(2), 10–15.
25.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's Future. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
26.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001a). Handbook for assessment of professional development schools. Washington, D.C.: Author.
27.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001b). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
NeapolitanJ., & LevineM. (2011). Approaches to professional development schools. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
29.
NolanJ.Jr., GroveD., LeftwichH., MarkK., & PetersB. (2011). Impact on professional development. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
30.
PDS2. (2010). PDS2 professional development school partnerships deliver success Retrieved on July 7, 2010 from http://pds2.gsu.edu/about.htm
31.
RosselliH., BrindleyR., DanielP., HallA, HomanS., & ApplegateJ. H. (1999, February). Beyond good intentions: Using standards to examine PDS sustainability through transitions. Paper presented at the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education annual meeting, Washington, DC.
32.
SchillemansT. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8, 175–194.
33.
ShelleyA. C., & WashburnS. (2000). Our NCATE report card: A partnership for excellence. Educational Forum, 64, 156–164.
34.
TeitelL. (2003). The professional development schools handbook: Starting, sustaining, and assessing partnerships that improve student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
TeitelL. (2008). School/university collaboration: The power of transformative partnerships. Childhood Education, 85(2), 75–80.
36.
TeitelL. (2011). Developing partnerships with purpose. In WepnerS. B. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), Collaborative leadership in action: Partnering for success in schools (pp. 51–73). New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
TrachtmanR. (2007). Inquiry and accountability in professional development schools. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 197–203.
38.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Overview: Fact sheet on the major provisions of the conference report to H.R. 1, the No Child Left Behind Act Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/factsheet.html
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2009). The Secretary's sixth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
WongP. L., & GlassR. D. (2011). Professional development schools and student learning and achievement. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
42.
Yendol-HoppeyD., HoppeyD., & PriceT. (2011). Sustaining Partnerships. In WepnerS. B. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), Collaborative leadership in action: Partnering for success in schools (pp. 74–96). New York: Teachers College Press.