AriavT., & ClinardL. (1996, June–July). Does coaching student teachers affect the professional development and teaching of cooperating teachers? A cross-cultural perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teacher Education, Netanya, Israel. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409267)
2.
BalachC., & SzymanskiG. (2003, April). Growth of a professional learning community through collaborative action research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477527)
3.
BolesK., & TroenV. (1994, April). Teacher leadership in a professional development school. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED375103)
BurnafordG., FischerJ., & HobsonD. (Eds.). (2001). Teachers doing research: The power of action through inquiry (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CampoyR. (1996). Teacher education goes to school. American School Board Journal, 183(3), 32–34.
7.
CatelliL. (1995). Action research as a way of learning about teaching in a mentor/student teacher relationship. Action in Teacher Education, 16(4), 25–38.
8.
CatelliL. (2000). Action research to effect change for adolescent girls at an urban middle school: A matter of life and death. Research in Middle Level Education, 23, 133–148.
9.
CatelliL. (2002, April). Assessing levels of student-teacher videotape classroom performances in a school-college partnership project. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481109)
10.
CatelliL. (2003, April). School-college partners: Action research and focus-group findings on what is important in preparing quality teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481108)
11.
CatelliL., & CarlinoJ. (2001). Collaborative action research to assess student learning and effect change. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(1), 1–8.
12.
CatelliL., PadovanoK., & CostelloJ. (2000). Action research in the context of a school-university partnership: Its value, problems, issues, and benefits. Educational Action Research, 8(2), 225–242.
ChantR., HeafnerT., & BennettK. (2004). Connecting personal theorizing and action research in preservice teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 25–42.
15.
ClinardL., & AndO. (1995, April). Cooperating teachers reflect upon the impact of coaching on their own teaching and professional life. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED390843)
16.
ClinardL., MironL., AriavT., BotzerI., ConroyJ., & LaycockK. (1997, April). Cross-cultural perspective of teachers’ perceptions: What contributions are exchanged between cooperating teachers and student teachers? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED413326)
17.
CoreyS. (1949). Curriculum development through action research. Educational Leadership, 7, 147–153.
18.
CoreyS. (1952). Action research by teachers and the population sampling problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 331–338.
19.
CoreyS. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
20.
CroccoM. S., FaithfullB., & SchwartzS. (2003). Inquiring minds want to know: Action research at a New York City professional development school. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 19–30.
21.
CrowN., AdamsE., BachmanM., PetersenS., VickreyS., & BarnhardtP. (1998, April). University-district professional development program: A systematic study of practice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED426465)
22.
CrowN., & AndO. (1996, April). Masters cooperative program: An alternative model of teacher development in PDS sites. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New York, NY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED399223)
23.
DanaN. (1992, October). Teacher leadership through collaborative action research: Implications for teachers, principals, and university researchers/teacher educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Association of Colleges and Teacher Educators, Grantsville, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352343)
24.
DanaN. (1993, April). Teachers for change: An elementary school collaborative program for enhancing school climate. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362287)
25.
DanaN., & AndO. (1992, February). Creating a culture for change: The university researcher, principal, and teacher family. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED350276)
26.
DanaN., & SilvaD. (1992, November). Discovering researcher subjectivities, perceptions, and biases: A critical examination of myths, metaphors, and meanings inherent in university-school collaborative action research projects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Research on Women in Education Conference, University Park, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352342)
27.
DanaN., & SilvaD. (1995). Action research, school change, and the silencing of teacher voice. Action in Teacher Education, 16(4), 59–70.
28.
DanaN., & SilvaD. (2000, April). From readiness to inquiry: The unfolding of supervision in the professional development school. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468426)
29.
DanaN., SilvaD., GimbertB., NolanJ., Zembal-SaulC., & TzurR. (2001). Developing new understandings of PDS work: Better problems, better questions. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 15–27.
30.
DanaN., SilvaD., & Snow-GeronoJ. (2002). Building a culture of inquiry in a professional development school. Teacher Education and Practice, 15(4), 71–89.
31.
DanaN., & Yendol-HoppeyD. (2008). Book club offers guide for coaches practicing action research. Journal of Staff Development, 19(2), 7–11.
32.
DanaN., Yendol-HoppeyD., & Snow-GeronoJ. (2006). Deconstructing inquiry in the professional development school: Exploring the domains and contents of teachers’ questions. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 59–71.
Devlin-SchererW., SpinelliA., GiammatteoD., JohnsonC., Mayo-MolinaS., & McGinleyP. (1998, February). Action research in professional development schools: Effects on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED418077)
35.
DuPontS. (2009). Raising comprehension scores through creative drama: Action research in a professional development partnership. International Journal of Learning, 16, 291–302.
36.
FineJ. (1997, December). Empowering teachers through a professional development school and classroom action research. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Reading Forum, Sanibel Island, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447462)
37.
GalassiJ., Brader-ArajeL., BrooksL., DennisonP., JonesM., & MebaneD. (1999). Emerging results from a middle school professional development school: The McDougle-University of North Carolina collaborative inquiry partnership groups. Peabody Journal of Education, 74, 236–253.
38.
GarrettJ. (2006). For the Record: It's time to spring into action research!Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(3), 104–105.
39.
GillesC., WilsonJ., & EliasM. (2010). Sustaining teachers’ growth and renewal through action research, induction programs, and collaboration. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 91–108.
40.
GulledgeS. (1998, April). Before and after pictures: The makeover of professional relationships through PDS collaboration. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420622)
41.
HollyP. (1991). Action research: The missing link in the creating of schools as centers of inquiry. In LiebermanA. & MillerL. (Eds.), Staff development for education in the 90s (pp. 133–157). New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
KinseyJ. (2010). National Association for Professional Development Schools Retrieved July 5, 2010, from http://www.napds.org
43.
KirschnerB. (1996). From cooperation to collaboration: The changing culture of school/university partnerships. Theory Into Practice, 35, 205–213.
44.
KnightS., & BoudahD. (2003). The impact of teachers’ participation in collaborative research on secondary students’ classroom behaviors and engagement. In WisemanD. & KnightS. (Eds.), Linking university-school collaboration and K-12 student outcomes (pp. 149–164). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
45.
KremenitzerJ., & MylerT. (2006). Collaboration between teacher educator and kindergarten teacher: A 4-year action research study to improve our own professional practices. Childhood Education, 82, 165–170.
46.
Kremer-HayonL. (1994, April). School-university collaboration: Its efficacy in professional development schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374695)
47.
LanierJ. (2006). Foreword. In The Holmes Trilogy—again! Holmes Partnership Trilogy: Tomorrow's teachers, tomorrow's schools, tomorrow's schools of education (p. 4). Lansing, MI: Holmes Partnership.
48.
LevinB., & RockT. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 135–149.
LewinK. (1946). Group decision and social change. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
51.
LiebermanA. (1993). The meaning of scholarly activity and the building of community. Equity and Choice, 10(1), 4–10.
52.
McGeeC. (2001). Action research, master of arts in teaching interns and a university/school partnership: A win, win, win situation. Teaching Education, 12, 359–369.
MurphyC. (1996). The professional development school: Linking the university and the public school. Action Research Project. St. Louis: University of Missouri–St. Louis.
55.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform Retrieved July 5, 2010, from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
56.
NeapolitanJ., & LevineM. (2011). Approaches to professional development schools. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
57.
NolenA., & PuttenJ. V. (2007). Action research in education: Addressing gaps in ethical principles and practices. Educational Researcher, 36, 401–407.
58.
OjaS. (2003, April). Action research and self-study by supervisors, cooperating teachers, and school principals working with interns in school-university partnerships. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482200)
59.
PoetterT. S., BadialiB., & HammondD. J. (2000). Growing teacher inquiry: Collaboration in a partner school. Peabody Journal of Education, 75, 161–175.
60.
RaffertyC. (1994, April). Promoting multi-site collaborative inquiry: Initial efforts and challenges. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED369320)
61.
RockT., & LevinB. (2002). Collaborative action research projects: Enhancing preservice teacher development in professional development schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 7–21.
62.
RutterA. (2011). Purpose and vision of professional development schools. NSSE Yearbook, 110(2).
63.
SagehornA. C., & LeTendreG. B. (2003). STAR: Students and Teachers in Action Research. In WisemanD. & KnightS. (Ed.), Linking school-university collaboration and K-12 student outcomes (pp. 155–164). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
64.
SchnorrD., & PainterD. (1999, February). Partnering the university field experience research model with action research. Paper presented at the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education annual meeting, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428058)
65.
SchubertW., & Lopez-SchubertA. (1997). Sources of a theory for action research in the United States. In McTaggartR. (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 203–210). Albany: State University of New York Press.
SomekhB. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
68.
SomekhB. (2010). The Collaborative Action Research Network: 30 years of agency in developing educational action research. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 103–121.
69.
ViechnickiK. J. (1997, April). Action research in a school/university partnership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409363)
70.
WorthamS. (1997, April). Facilitating teacher research through school-university partnerships. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410219)