Abdal-HaqqI. (1998). Professional development schools: Weighing the evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2.
AllsoppD. H., DeMarieD., Alvarez-McHattonP., & DooneE. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 19–35.
3.
BlackwellP. J. (2002, April). Putting the pieces of teacher education together: Lessons learned by the Eisenhower Initial Teacher Professional Development Programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465745)
4.
CapraroM. M., CapraroR. M., & HelfeldtJ. (2010). Do differing types of field experiences make a difference in teacher candidates’ perceived level of competence?Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 131–154.
5.
CastleS., FoxR. K., & FuhrmanC. (2009). Does professional development school preparation make a difference? A comparison of three teacher candidate studies. School University Partnerships, 3(2), 58–68.
6.
CastleS., FoxR. K., & SouderK. O. (2006). Do professional development schools (PDSs) make a difference? A Comparative study of PDS and non-PDS teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 65–80.
7.
CobbJ. B. (2001). Graduates of professional development school programs: Perceptions of the teacher as change agent. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 89–107.
8.
ConnorK. R., & KillmerN. (2001). Cohorts, collaboration, and community: Does contextual teacher education really work?Action in Teacher Education, 23(3), 46–53.
9.
DamoreS. J., KapustkaK. M., & McDevittP. (in press). The urban professional development school network: Assessing the partnership's impact on initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator.
10.
DuffieldS. K. (2005). Swimming in the water: Immersing teacher candidates in the environment of a school. Current Issues in Education, 8(11).
11.
FleenerC., & DahmP. F. (2007). Elementary teacher attrition: A comparison of the effects of professional development schools and traditional campus-based programs. Teacher Education and Practice, 20, 263–283.
12.
GrishamD. L., BergM., JacobsV. R., & MathisonC. (2002). Can a professional development school have a lasting impact on teachers’ beliefs and practices?Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(3), 7–24.
13.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
14.
HoustonW. R., HollisL.Y., ClayD., LigonsC. M., & RoffL. (1999). Effects of collaboration on urban education programs and professional development schools. In ByrdD. M & McIntyreD. J. (Eds.), Research on professional development schools. Teacher education yearbook VII (pp. 6–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
LarsonW. C., & GoebelA. J. (2008). Putting theory into practice: A professional development school/university co-teaching project. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 52–61.
16.
LathamN. I., & VogtW. P. (2007). Do professional development schools reduce teacher attrition? Evidence from a longitudinal study of 1,000 graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 153–167.
17.
LevinB. B., & RockT.C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135–149.
18.
Mantle-BromleyC., GouldL. M., McWhorterB. A., & WhaleyD. C. (2000). The effect of program structure on new teachers’ employment and program satisfaction patterns. Action in Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–14.
19.
McKinneyS. E., & FinkeJ. A. (2004–2005). A comparison of the internship experience for student interns placed in different urban school environments. Professional Educator, 27(1&2), 51–57.
20.
McKinneyS. E., HabermanM., Stafford-JohnsonD., & RobinsonJ. (2008). Developing teachers for high-poverty schools: The role of the internship experience. Urban Education, 43(1), 68–82.
21.
McKinneyS. E., RobinsonJ., & SpoonerM. (2004). A comparison of urban teacher characteristics for student interns placed in different urban school settings. Professional Educator, 26(2), 17–30.
22.
MuleL. (2006). Preservice teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 205–218.
23.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
NeapolitanJ., Hartzler-MillerC., KenreichT., WiltzN., SchaferK., ProfittT. (2008). Keeping good teachers: Connections to professional development school preparation. School-University Partnerships, 2(1), 61–72.
25.
PaeseP. C. (2003). Impact of professional development schools: Pre-service through induction. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 83–88.
26.
ReynoldsA., RossS. M., & RakowJ. H. (2002). Teacher retention, teaching effectiveness, and professional preparation: A comparison of professional development school and non-professional development school graduates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 289–303.
27.
RidleyD. S., HurwitzS., HackettM. R. D., & MillerK. K. (2005). Comparing PDS and campus-based preservice teacher preparation: Is PDS-based preparation really better?Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 46–56.
28.
RobinsonS. P. (2006). Getting serious about clinical development. AACTE Briefs, 27(7), 2.
29.
RockT. C., & LevinB. B. (2002). Collaborative action research projects: Enhancing pre-service teacher development in professional development schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 7–21.
30.
SandholtzJ. H., & DadlezS. H. (2000). Professional development school trade-offs in teacher preparation and renewal. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(1), 7–27.
31.
SandholtzJ. H., & WassermanK. (2001). Student and cooperating teachers: Contrasting experiences in teacher preparation programs. Action in Teacher Education, 23(3), 54–65.
32.
ShroyerM. G., WrightE. L., & BolickM. E. (1996, April). Expertise in pre-service science education: An innovative approach to preparing elementary science educators, Year II. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
33.
ShroyerM. G., WrightE. L., KerrS., & WeamerD. (1996, April). Expertise in elementary math and science teaching: Evaluating an innovative pre-service preparation model. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
34.
TeitelL. (2003). The professional development schools handbook: Starting, sustaining and assessing partnerships that improve student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
TeitelL. (2004). How professional development schools make a difference: A review of research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.
36.
WallingB., & LewisM. (2000). Development of professional identity among professional development school preservice teachers: Longitudinal and comparative analysis. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2a), 63–72.
37.
WongP. L., & GlassR. D. (2005). Assessing a professional development school approach to preparing teachers for urban schools serving low-income, culturally and linguistically diverse communities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(3), 63–77.