AjayiL. (2009). English as a second language learners’ exploration of multimodal texts in a junior high school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), 585–595.
2.
AlvermannD. E. (2004). Adolescent aliteracy: Are schools causing it?Voices in Urban Education, 3(Winter/Spring), 26–35.
AlvermannD. E. (Ed.). (2010). Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, & popular culture. New York, NY: Lang.
5.
AlvermannD. E., MarshallJ. D., McLeanC. A., BishopJ., & KirkD. (2007, April). Web identities and digital literacies in an out-of- school program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
6.
AlvermannD. E., & MooreD. W. (1991). Secondary reading. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 951–983). White Plains, NY: Longman.
7.
AlvermannD. E., & WilsonA. A. (in press). Comprehension strategy instruction for multimodal texts in science. Theory into Practice.
8.
BartonD., HamiltonM., & IvanicR. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London, England: Routledge.
9.
BigumC., DurrantC., GreenB., HonanE., LankshearC., MorganW., … WildM. (1997). Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in education: Current practices and future directions: Vol. 1. Canberra, Australia: Literacy and Special Programmes Branch, Schools Division, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
10.
BlackR. W. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York, NY: Lang.
11.
BoydD. (2008). Why youth social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
BuckinghamD. (Ed.). (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CollinsA. (2010, June 11). Rethinking education in the age of technology. Paper presented at the Games, Learning, and Society (GLS) Conference, Madison, WI.
16.
CowanJ. (2010). Webkinz, blogs, and avatars: Lessons learned from young adolescents. In AlvermannD. E. (Ed.), Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture (pp. 27–49). New York, NY: Lang.
17.
DraperR. J., & SiebertD. (2004). Different goals, similar practices: Making sense of mathematics and literacy instruction in a standards-based mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 927–962.
18.
DrotnerK. (2008). Leisure is hard work: Digital practices and future competencies. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 167–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
FoucaultM. (1994/1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. (RabinowP., Ed., R. Hurley et al., Trans.) New York, NY: New Press. (Original work published in 1994)
21.
GeeJ. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, England: Falmer.
22.
GeeJ. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
23.
GeeJ. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GoldmanS., BookerA., & McDermottM. (2008). Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 185–206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
GuzzettiB. J. (2006). Cybergirls: Negotiating social identities on cybersites. E-Learning, 3(2), 158–169.
26.
GuzzettiB. (2009). Commentary: Thinking like a forensic scientist: Learning with academic and everyday texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53, 192–203.
27.
GuzzettiB., ElliottK., & WelschD. (2010). DIY media in the classroom: New literacies across content areas. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HagoodM. C., AlvermannD. E., & Heron-HrubyA. (2010). Bring it to class: Unpacking pop culture in literacy learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
HobbsR. (2010). Copyright clarity: How fair use supports digital learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
HonanE. (2008). Barriers to teachers using digital texts in literacy classrooms. Literacy, 42(1), 36–43.
31.
HonanE. (2010). Mapping discourses in teachers’ talk about using digital texts in classrooms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 179–193.
32.
ItoM., HorstH., BittantiM., BoydD., Herr-StephensonB., LangeP. G., … RobinsonL. (2008, November). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
33.
JacobsG. E. (2006). Fast times and digital literacy: Participation roles and portfolio construction within instant messaging. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 171–196.
KirklandD. (2007, July). Digital underground: Urban youth, new technologies, and composition. Paper presented at the 20th annual Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, College Station, PA.
38.
KnobelM., & LankshearC. (Eds.). (2010). DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies. New York, NY: Lang.
39.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, England: Routledge.
40.
LadbrookJ. (2008). Teachers of digikids: Do they navigate the divide?Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32(1), 69–82.
41.
LankshearC., & KnobelM. (2002). Do we have your attention? New literacies, digital technologies, and the education of adolescents. In AlvermannD. E. (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 19–39). New York, NY: Lang.
42.
LemkeJ. (2009). Multimodality, identity, and time. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 140–150). New York, NY: Routledge.
LenhartA., MaddenM., MacgillA. R., & SmithA. (2007, December). Teens and social media. PEW Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: PEW Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/230/report_display.asp
45.
LeskoN. (2001). Act your age! A cultural construction of adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
46.
LewisC., & FindersM. (2002). Implied adolescents and implied teachers: A generation gap for new times. In AlvermannD. E. (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 101–113). New York, NY: Lang.
47.
LivingstoneS., BoberM., & HelsperE. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online project [online]. London, England: LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000397
48.
McClenaghanD., & DoeckeB. (2010). Resources for meaning-making in the secondary English classroom. In ColeD. R. & PullenD. L. (Eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 224–238). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
MerchantG. (2010). View my profile(s). In AlvermannD. E. (Ed.), Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture (pp. 51–69). New York, NY: Lang.
50.
MojeE. B., OverbyM., TysvaerN., & MorrisK. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107–154.
RennieJ., & PattersonA. (2010). Young Australians reading in a digital world. In ColeD. R. & PullenD. L. (Eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 207–223). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
RideoutV. J., FoehrU. G., & RobertsD. F.. (2010). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds.Menlo Park, CA: The Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm
SpiresH., LeeJ., TurnerK., & JohnsonJ. (2008). Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement. Journal of Research in Technology on Education, 40, 497–515.
58.
StreetB. V. (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
ThomasA. (2007). Youth online: Identity and literacy in the digital age. New York, NY: Lang.
61.
UnsworthL., & CléirighC. (2009). Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image-text interaction. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 151–163). New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
WadeS. E., & MojeE. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. III (pp. 609–628). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63.
WalshM. (2008). Worlds have collided and modes have merged: Classroom evidence of changed literacy practices. Literacy, 42(2), 101–108.