AitkenS. C. (2001). Geographies of young people: The morally contested spaces of identity. New York: Routledge.
2.
AppiahA. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. London: Allen Lane.
3.
BezemerJ., & KressG. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
4.
BlackR. W. (2007). Fanfiction writing and the construction of space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(4), 384–397.
5.
BlackburnM. (2005). Disrupting Dichotomies for Social Change: A Review of, Critique of, and Complement to Current Educational Literacy Scholarship on Gender. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 398–416.
6.
CrangM., CrangM., & MayJ. (Eds.). (1999). Virtual geographies: Bodies, space, and relations. New York: Routledge.
7.
DysonA. H., & GenishiC. E. (1994). The need for story: Cultural diversity in classroom and community. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
FreireP. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. London: Routledge.
9.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
GonzálezN., MollL. C., & AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practice in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
11.
HansenD. T. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and education: A view from the ground. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 1–30.
12.
HollowayS. L., & ValentineG. (2003). Cybergeographies: Children's on-line worlds. In HollowayS. L. & ValentineG. (Eds.), Cyberkids (pp. 127–152). London: Routledge.
13.
HullG., & JamesM. (2007). Geographies of hope: A study of urban landscapes and a university-community collaborative. In O'NeillPeggy (Ed.), Blurring boundaries: Developing writers, researchers, and teachers: A tribute to William L. Smith (pp. 250–89). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
14.
HullG., & NelsonM. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.
15.
HullG., & SchultzK. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575–611.
16.
HullG., StornaiuoloA., & SahniU. (2010). Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 42(4), 331–367.
17.
HullG., ZacherJ., & HibbertL. (2009). Youth, risk, and equity in a global world. Review of Research in Education.33(1), 117–159
18.
IedemaR. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.
ItoM. (2006). Japanese media mixes and amateur cultural exchange. In BuckinghamD. & WillettR. (Eds.), Digital generations: children, young people, and new media (pp. 49–66). London: Routledge.
21.
ItoM., BaumerS., BittantiM., boydd., CodyR., Herr-StephensonB. … TrippL. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
JanksH. (2006). Games go abroad. English Studies in Africa, 49(1), 115–138.
24.
JewittC. (2002). The move from page to screen: The multimodal reshaping of school English. Visual Communication, 1(2), 171–195.
25.
JewittC. (2005). Multimodality, “reading,” and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 26(3), 315–331.
26.
JewittC. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
27.
JewittC., & KressG. R. (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
28.
JohnsonE. (In Press). Performative politics and radical possibilities: Re-framing pop culture text work in schools. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing.
29.
KressG., & OgbornJ. (1998). Modes of representation and local epistemologies: The presentation of science in education, subjectivity in the school curriculum (Working Paper 2, Institute of Education). London: University of London.
30.
KressG., & Van LeeuwenT. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
31.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
32.
LamW. S. E. (2006). Re-envisioning language, literacy, and the immigrant subject in new mediascapes. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(3), 171–195.
33.
LeanderK. M. (2002, December). Situated literacies, digital practices, and the constitution of space-time. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference. Miami, Fl.
34.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space. [D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.]. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
LunsfordA. A. (2007). Writing matters: Rhetoric in public and private lives. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
37.
MahiriJ. (2004). What they don't learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth. New York: Peter Lang.
38.
MojeE. B., CiechanowskiK. M., KramerK., EllisL., CarrilloR., & CollazoT. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.
39.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
NayakA. (2003). Race, place and globalization: Youth cultures in a changing world (1st ed.). New York: Berg.
42.
PahlK., & RowsellJ. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
RowsellJ., & PahlK. (2007). Sedimented identities in texts: Instances of practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 388–404.
44.
SiegelM. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.
45.
SilverstoneR. (2006). Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
46.
SkeltonT., & ValentineG. (1998). Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures. London and New York: Routledge.
47.
SoepE., & ChávezV. (2010). Drop that knowledge: Youth Radio stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
SojaE. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49.
SteinP. (2003). The Olifantsvlei fresh stories project: Multimodality, creativity, and fixing in the semiotic chain. In JewittC. & KressG. (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 123–138). New York: Peter Lang.
50.
ThomasA. (2004). Digital literacies of cybergirl. E-Learning, 1(3), 358–382.
51.
ThomasA. (2005). Children online: Learning in a virtual community of practice. E-Learning, 2(1), 27–38.
52.
VadeboncoeurJ. A., & Patel StevensL. (2005). Reconstructing the “adolescent”: Sign, symbol, and body. New York: Peter Lang.
53.
VasudevanL. (2006). Making known differently: Engaging visual modalities as spaces to author new selves. E-Learning, 3(2), 207–216.
54.
VasudevanL. (2009). Performing new geographies of literacy teaching and learning. English Education, 41(4), 356–374.
55.
VasudevanL., StagemanD., RodriguezK., FernandezE., & DattatreyanG. (2010). Authoring new narratives with youth at the intersection of the arts and justice. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(1), 54–65.
56.
VasudevanL., & WissmanK. (2011). Out-of-school literacy contexts. In LappD. & FisherD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57.
WeisL. E., & FineM. E. (2000). Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
WissmanK. (2008). “This is what I see”: (Re)envisioning photography as a social practice. In HillM. L. & VasudevanL. (Eds.), Media, learning, and sites of possibility (pp. 13–45). New York: Peter Lang.
59.
YanceyK. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297–328.