Just as a child who has learned to grasp stretches out its hand for the moon as it would for a ball, so humanity, in all its efforts at innervation, sets its sights as much on currently utopian goals as on goals within reach. Because… technology aims at liberating human beings from drudgery, the individual suddenly sees his scope for play, his field of action, immeasurably expanded. He does not yet know his way around this space. But already he registers his demands on it. (Benjamin, 1936/2008, p. 242)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarthesR. (1976). The pleasure of the text (R. Howard, Trans.). London, England: Cape.
2.
BenjaminW. (1936/2008). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility. In JenningsM. W., DohertyB., & LevinT. Y. (Eds.), The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility and other writings on media (pp. 19–55). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BurrowsP. (2005a). The emergence of pedagogical mentors. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 177–196). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
4.
BurrowsP. (2005b). Learning by design: A marriage of theory and practice. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 159–176). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
5.
BurrowsP. (2005c). The role of the teacher-enactor and author-publisher. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 197–216). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
6.
BurrowsP., CopeB., KalantzisM., MorganL., SuominenK., & YellandN. (2007). Data from the Australian Research Council Learning by Design project (Unpublished manuscript).
7.
BurrowsP., CopeB., KalantzisM., MorganL., SuominenK., & YellandN. (2009). Data from the Australian Research Council Learning by Design project. (Unpublished manuscript).
8.
CazdenC. B. (1994). Immersing, revealing and telling: A continuum from implicit to teaching. In LiD. C. S., MahoneyD., & RichardsJ. C. (Eds.), Exploring second language teacher development (pp. 59–69). Hong Kong: Hong Kong City Polytechnic.
9.
CazdenC. B. (2000). Four innovative programmes: A postscript from Alice Springs. In CopeB. & KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 321–332). London, England: Routledge.
10.
CazdenC. B. (2006a). Connected learning: “Weaving” in classroom lessons. In: Pedagogy in Practice 2006 Conference. Newcastle, England: University of Newcastle.
11.
CazdenC. B. (2006b). Review of KamH. W. & WongR. Y. L. (Eds.), Language policies and language education: The impact in East Asian countries in the next decade (2nd ed.) 2004, and KamH. W. & WongR. Y. L. (Eds.), English language teaching in East Asia today: Changing policies and practices (2nd ed.), 2004. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 784–789.
12.
CloonanA. (2005). Professional learning and enacting theory: On trying to be a lifelong/lifewide teacher-learner. In KalantzisM. and CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 217–230). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
13.
CloonanA. (2007). The professional learning of teachers: A case study of multiliteracies teaching in the early years of schooling. Melbourne, Australia: School of Education, RMIT University.
14.
CloonanA. (2008). Multimodality pedagogies: A multiliteracies approach. International Journal of Learning, 15, 159–168.
15.
CopeB. (2001). New ways with words: Print and etext convergence. In CopeB. & KalantzisM. (Eds.), Print and electronic text convergence: Vol. 2.1. Technology drivers across the book production supply chain, from the creator to the consumer (pp. 1–15). Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground.
16.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (2000a). Designs for social futures. In CopeB. & KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 203–234). London, England: Routledge.
17.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (2000b). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, England: Routledge.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (2009a). A grammar of multimodality. International Journal of Learning, 16, 361–425.
20.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (2009b). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164–195.
21.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (forthcoming). “Education is the new philosophy,” to make a metadisciplinary claim for the learning sciences. In ReidA., HartP., RussellC., & PetersM. (Eds.), Companion to educational research.
22.
EcoU. (1981). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. London, England: Hutchinson.
23.
EisensteinE. L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformation in early-modern Europe. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FebvreL., & MartinH. (1976). The coming of the book. London, England: Verson.
25.
FraserN. (2008). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “postsocialist” age. In OlsonK. (Ed.), Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics (pp. 11–41). London, England: Verso.
26.
GeeJ. P. (2004a). Game-like situated learning: An example of situated learning and implications for opportunity to learn. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
27.
GeeJ. P. (2004b). Situated language and Learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London, England: Routledge.
28.
GeeJ. P. (2006). Are video games good for learning?. Madison: Games and Professional Simulation Group, University of Wisconsin.
29.
GraftonA. (1997). The footnote: A curious history. London, England: Faber and Faber.
30.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2009). Participatory transformations. In CopeB. & KalantzisM. (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning (pp. 31–48). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
31.
JenkinsH. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
32.
KalantzisM. (2004). Waiting for the barbarians: “Knowledge management” and “learning organisations.” International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 4, 1827–1833.
33.
KalantzisM., & CopeB. (2004). Designs for learning. E-Learning, 1, 38–92.
KalantzisM., & CopeB. (2008a). Digital communications, multimodality and diversity: Towards a pedagogy of multiliteracies. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, XLV, 15–50.
36.
KalantzisM., & CopeB. (2008b). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
KalantzisM., & CopeB. (2011b). Learning by design Retrieved from http://L-by-D.com
39.
KressG. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
40.
KressG. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In CopeB. & KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). London, England: Routledge.
41.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, England: Routledge.
42.
KressG. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, England: Routledge.
43.
KressG., & van LeeuwenT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, England: Routledge.
44.
LukeA. (2002). Curriculum, ethics and metanarrative: Teaching and learning beyond the nation. Curriculum Perspectives, 22(1), 49–55.
45.
LukeA., CourtneyC., LinA., & FreebodyP. (2003). The Singapore classroom coding scheme. [Technical report]. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Center for Research on Pedagogy and Practice.
46.
LukeA., FreebodyP., ShunL., & GopinathanG. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25, 5–28.
NevilleM. (2005). Innovation in education Queensland: Multiliteracies in action. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 231–256). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
49.
NevilleM. (2008). Teaching multimodal literacy using the learning by design approach to pedagogy. Melbourne, Australia: The University Press/Common Ground.
50.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
51.
OngW. J. (1958). Ramus, method and the decay of dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
PandianA., & BalrajS. (2005). Approaching “learning by design” as an agenda for Malaysian schools. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 285–313). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
53.
PolanyiM. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
ScollonR. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London, England: Routledge.
55.
StegerM. B. (2008). The rise of the global imaginary: Political ideologies from the French Revolution to the global war on terror. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
56.
StewartT. A. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
57.
SuominenK. (2009). Students learning by design: A study on the impact of learning by design on student learning. Melbourne, Australia: School of Education, RMIT.
58.
van HarenH. (2007). Diversity and the learning by design approach to pedagogy in the middle years. Melbourne, Australia: School of Education, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
59.
van HarenR. (2005). Effective teaching and learning: Pedagogy and multiliteracies. In KalantzisM. & CopeB. (Eds.), Learning by design (pp. 257–284). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
60.
VirilioP. (1997). Open sky. London, England: Verso.
61.
VygotskyL. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
