Several studies have argued that the academic struggles of Latino/a students are connected, at least in part, to the dearth of Latino/a teachers and other school personnel who may be better equipped to meet the needs of this group. Others have suggested that there are significant academic benefits to having a more diverse teaching force. Despite significant population growth among Latinos/as in the United States, the teaching force remains overwhelmingly White, as Latino/a students continue to be underrepresented in institutions of higher education and, more specifically, within teacher education programs.
Purpose/Objective/Focus of the Study
Given the failure of teacher preparation programs to attract and retain more Latino/a students, and the implications that the shortage of qualified teachers has on Latino/a and other K–12 students, it is vital to learn from the challenges and successes of Latino/a preservice teachers to improve the ways in which teachers of diverse backgrounds are attracted into the field and prepared for this work. This article reports the findings of an ethnographic study in which a cohort of Latino/a preservice teachers was followed from the teachers’ recruitment into college, through their undergraduate years and, for most, their eventual transition into the teaching profession.
Setting
All the participants were undergraduate students enrolled in the teacher education program at a Predominantly White Institution (PWI) of higher education in the northeastern United States.
Participants
A cohort of 5 Latino/a preservice teachers recruited to the institution as part of a minority teacher recruitment program participated in the study.
Research Design
This article draws from data collected ethnographically, using phenome-nological interviews, observations, field notes, and student work products to document barriers that students encountered while navigating their preservice teacher education program. The author critically examines how this cohort of Latino/a undergraduates experienced systematic silencing, the result of the acts of individual agents and institutional practices and policies that manifested in overt and subtle forms of subordination.
Findings
The study reveals how subordination serves to marginalize students of color by hindering their full, active participation in teacher preparation programs through the silencing of their voices. Using critical race theory (CRT) and Latino/a critical race theory (LatCrit) as analytic lenses, the author describes multiple sites within the institution of higher education where students experienced silencing.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The article concludes with a discussion of implications, framed around the central tenets of CRT and LatCrit, for improving the recruitment and retention of Latino/a college students in teacher education, particularly as an important means for enhancing the educational experiences and outcomes for Latinos/as in K–12 schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchinsteinB., & AguirreJ. (2008). Cultural match or culturally suspect: How new teachers of color negotiate sociocultural challenges in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 110, 1505–1540.
2.
AngristJ. D., & GuryanJ. (2008). Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements. Economics of Education Review, 27, 483–503.
3.
AstinA. W., & OsegueraL. (2004). The declining “equity” of American higher education. Review of Higher Education, 27, 321–341.
4.
Bakke v. Regents of the University of California 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
5.
BecketD. R. (1998). Increasing the number of Latino and Navajo teachers in hard-to-staff schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 196–205.
6.
BellD. (1980). Race, racism and American law.Boston: Little, Brown.
7.
BoundJ., LovenheimM., & TurnerS. (2009). Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources. (NBER Working Paper No. 15566). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BowenW. G., & BokD. (1998). The shape of the river.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BowlesS., & GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America.London: Routledge.
10.
CastagnoA. E. (2008). “I don't want to hear that!”: Legitimating whiteness through silencing in schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39, 314–333.
11.
Center on Education Policy. (2008). State high school exit exams: A move toward end-of-course exams.Washington, DC: Author.
12.
ChapmanT. (2007). Interrogating classroom relationships and events: Using portraiture and critical race theory in education research. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 156–162.
13.
Cochran-SmithM., DavisD., & FriesK. (2004). Multicultural teacher education research, practice, and policy. In BanksJ., & McGee BanksC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. (2nd ed., pp. 931–975). San Francisco: Wiley.
14.
ComminsN. L., & MiramontesO. B. (2006). Addressing linguistic diversity from the outset. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 240–246.
15.
ContrerasF. (2005). Access, achievement, and social capital: Standardized exams and the Latino college-bound population. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 197–214.
16.
CooperT. L. (2006). The Sista’ network: African-American women faculty successfully negotiating the road to tenure.Bolton, MA: Anker.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CrossB. E. (2003). Learning or unlearning racism: Transferring teacher education curriculum to classroom practice. Theory Into Practice, 42, 203–209.
19.
Darling-HammondL (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu
DeeT. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 195–210.
22.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction.New York: New York University Press.
23.
DixsonA. D., & RousseauC. K. (2005). And we are still not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 7–27.
24.
DuranR. (1994). Hispanic student achievement. In JustizM. J., WilsonR., & BjorkL. G. (Eds.), Minorities in higher education. (pp. 151–172). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
25.
EubanksS., & WeaverR. (1999). Excellence through diversity: Connecting the teacher quality and teacher diversity agendas. Journal of Negro Education, 68, 451–459.
26.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school.Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
FlippoR. F., & RiccardsM. P. (2000). Initial teacher certification testing in Massachusetts: A case of the tail wagging the dog. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 34–37.
28.
FreedleR. (2003). Correcting the SAT's ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 1–43.
29.
FryR. (2002). Latinos in higher education: Many enroll, too few graduate.Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
30.
FryR. (2005). Recent changes in the entry of Hispanic and White youth into college.Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
31.
GándaraP., & ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
GándaraP., & LopezE. (1998). Latino students and college entrance exams: How much do they really matter?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(1), 17–39.
33.
García-NevarezA. G., StaffordM. E., & AriasB. (2005). Arizona elementary teachers’ attitudes toward English language learners and the use of Spanish in classroom instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 295–316.
34.
GasmanM. (2008). Minority-serving institutions: The path to successfully educating students of color.Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation.
35.
GreeneJ. P., & WintersM. (2005). Public high school graduation and college readiness: 1991. 2002.New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
36.
GrinbergJ. G. A., GolfarbK. P., & SaavedraE. (2005). Con passion y con coraje: The schooling of Latino/a students and their teachers’ education. In PedrazaP., & RiveraM. (Eds.), Latino education: An agenda for community action research. (pp. 231–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Grutter et al. v. Bollinger et al., No. 02-241 (June 23, 2003, slip op. of the U.S. Supreme Court).
38.
GuinierL., FineM., BalinJ., BartowL., & StachelD. (1994). Becoming gentlemen: Women's experiences at one Ivy League law school. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, 1–110.
HedgesL., & NowellA. (1998). Black-White test score convergence since 1965. In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap. (pp. 149–181). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41.
HeubertJ. (2002). High-stakes testing: Opportunities and risks for students of color, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. In PinesM. (Ed.), The 21st century challenge: Moving the youth agenda forward. (pp. 39–50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
HillD., & GilletteM. (2005). Teachers for tomorrow in urban schools: Recruiting and supporting the pipeline. Multicultural Perspectives.7(3), 42–50.
43.
HurtadoS. (2005). Latino educational outcomes and the campus climate. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 235–251.
44.
IrizarryJ. G. (2007). Home-growing teachers of color for urban schools: Lessons learned from a town-gown partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 87–102.
45.
IrizarryJ. G., & Antrop-GonzálezR. (2007). RicanStructing the discourse and promoting school success: Extending a theory of CRP to DiaspoRicans. Centro Journal of the Center for Puerto Rican Studies, 20(2), 36–59.
46.
IrvineJ. J. (2003). Educating teachers for diversity: Seeing with a cultural eye.New York: Teachers College Press.
47.
JaramilloN. E., & McLarenP. (2009). From the imaginary to the real: Towards a critical teacher education. International Journal of Educational Policies, 3(1), 5–19.
48.
KarenD. (1991). “Achievement” and “ascription” in admission to an elite college: A political-organizational analysis. Sociological Forum, 6, 349–380.
49.
KidderW. (2003). Struggle for access from Sweatt to Grutter: A history of African American, Latino, and American Indian Law School admissions, 1950–2000. Harvard Blackletter Law Journal, 19, 1–42.
50.
KingS. H. (1993). The limited presence of African-American teachers. Review of Educational Research, 63, 115–149.
51.
KirbyS. N., BerendsM., & NaftelS. (1999). Supply and demand of minority teacher in Texas: Problems and prospects. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 47–66.
52.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateB. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–67.
53.
LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
54.
LawI., PhillipsD., & TurneyL. (Eds.). (2004). Institutional racism in higher education.Stoke on Trent, England: Trentham.
55.
LincolnY., & GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
LongM. C. (2004). Race and college admission: An alternative to Affirmative Action?Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 1020–1033.
57.
MatsudaM. (1987). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 323–399.
58.
McLarenP. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. (5th ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
59.
MeierK. J., WrinkleR. D., & PolinardJ. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. Journal of Politics, 61, 1025–1039.
60.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
MilnerH. R. (2008). Critical race theory and interest convergence as analytical tools in teacher education policies and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 332–346.
63.
MonzóL. D., & RuedaR. (2001). Professional roles, caring, and scaffolds: Latino teachers’ and paraeducators’ interactions with Latino students. American Journal of Education, 109, 438–471.
64.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) 2003–04, Public Teacher File.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006313.pdf
65.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Dropout and completion rates in the United States: 2006 (NCES 2008-053).Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2008053
66.
NietoS. (2004). Black, White, and us: The meaning of Brown v. Board of Education for Latinos. Multicultural Perspectives, 6(4), 22–25.
67.
O'NeilR. M. (1971). Preferential admissions: Equalizing the access of minority groups to higher education. Yale Law Journal, 80, 699–767.
68.
PadillaR., & ChavezR. (1995). The leaning ivory tower: Latino professors in American universities.Albany: State University of New York Press.
69.
Pew Hispanic Center. (2008). U.S. population projections: 2005–2050.Washington, DC: Author.
70.
PollockM. (2004). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in an American school.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
QuirozP. (2001). The silencing of Latino student “voice”: Puerto Rican and Mexican narratives in eighth grade and high school. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32, 326–349.
72.
ReardonS., & GalindoC. (2002, April). Do high-stakes tests affect students’ decisions to drop out of school? Evidence from NELS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
73.
RodriguezA. L., Guido-DiBritoR., TorresV., & TalbotD. (2000). Latina college students: Issues and challenges for the 21st century. NASPA Journal, 37, 511–527.
74.
Rolón-DowR. (2005). Critical care: A color(full) analysis of care narratives in the schooling experiences of Puerto Rican girls. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 77–111.
75.
SantiagoD. A. (2007). Voces: A profile of today's Latino college students.Washington, DC: Excelencia in Education.
76.
SchragP. (2003). The final test: The battle for adequacy in America's schools.New York: New Press.
77.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences.New York: Teachers College Press.
78.
SleeterC. E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 94–106.
79.
SmithG. P. (1987). The effects of competency testing on the supply of minority teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 308521)
80.
SolórzanoD., CejaM., & YossoT. (2000) Critical race theory, racial microaggressions and campus racial climate: The experiences of African-American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.
81.
SolórzanoD. G., & Delgado BernalD. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 3, 308–342.
82.
SolórzanoD. G., & YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23–44.
83.
SteinN. (1995). Affirmative Action and the persistence of racism. Social Justice, 22(3), 28–43.
84.
SwansonC. B. (2009). Closing the graduation gap: Educational and economic conditions in America's largest cities.Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.
85.
TateW. F., Ladson-BillingsG., & GrantC. A. (1993). The Brown decision revisited: Mathematizing social problems. Educational Policy, 7, 255–275.
86.
ValenzuelaA. (Ed.). (2005). Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth.Albany: State University of New York Press.
87.
VillalpandoO., & Delgado BernalD. (2002). A critical race theory analysis of barriers that impede the success of faculty of color. In SmithW., AltbachP., & LomoteyK. (Eds.), The racial crisis in American higher education. (2nd ed., pp. 243–269). New York: State University of New York Press.
88.
VillegasA. M. (2007, April). Profile of new Hispanic teachers in U.S. public schools: Looking at issues of quantity and quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
89.
VillegasA. M. (2009, February). Hispanic research agenda: Teacher preparation. Paper presented at the board meeting of the National Latino/a Education Research Agenda Project, New York, NY.
90.
VillegasA. M., & ClewellB. C. (1998). Increasing teacher diversity by tapping the parapro-fessional pool. Theory Into Practice, 37, 121–130.
91.
VillegasA. M., & LucasT. (2004). Diversifying the teacher workforce: A retrospective and prospective analysis. In SmylieM. A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce: 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. (pp. 70–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
YossoT. J., ParkerL., SolórzanoD. G., & LynnM. (2004). From Jim Crow to Affirmative Action and back again: A critical race discussion of racialized rationales and access to higher education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 1–27.
93.
ZirkelS. (2002). Is there a place for me? Role models and academic identity among White students and Students of Color. Teachers College Record, 104, 357–377.
