[Re]conceptualizing Inclusion: Can Critical Race Theory and Interest Convergence be Utilized to Achieve Inclusion and Equity for African American Students?

Abstract

Background/Context

Even though not fully realized, in legislation and theory, the requirements of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act and the No Child Left Behind Act have created pressure to address the historical inequity in educational opportunity, achievement, and outcomes, as well as disparities in achievement between students of color and White students; disproportionality in special education referral, identification, and placement; high dropout rates for students of color; and disproportionate discipline and referrals for students of color, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, students from immigrant families, and students in urban areas.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

The authors argue that inclusive education never had the potential to be truly inclusive because it is built on the premises of an inferiority paradigm. Issues of race, class, and privilege have rarely been incorporated into the inclusive education definitions or debates in the United States, and certainly not in practice. The purpose of this article is to examine: (a) the historical context of public schooling in America; (b) inclusive education in practice: segregation of African American and other students of color; (c) [re]conceptualizing inclusion: the importance of a social justice lens and critical theory; and (d) the relevance of interest convergence.

Research Design

Analytic essay.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The authors contend that the inclusive education movement has not resulted in positive outcomes or inclusion in general education for African American students because the movement was built on faulty assumptions that centered on ability and placement and did not look at the intersection of ability/disability with race, class, culture, and language. More important, the movement did not address issues of racism, White privilege, White dominance, and social class dominance. The authors assert that social justice, critical race theory, and interest convergence are powerful tools with which to [re]conceptualize inclusion and inclusive education in America.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applebaum

(2005). In the name of morality: Moral responsibility, whiteness, and social justice education. Journal of Moral Education, 34, 277–290.

Applied Research Center. (2006). Historical timeline of public education in the United States. Retrieved July 14, 2006, from http://www.arc.org/content/view/100/48

Asante

(n.d.) What is inclusion? The Inclusion Network. Retrieved from October 6, 2010, from http://www.inclusion.com/inclusion.html

Asch

(2001). Critical race theory, feminism, and disability: Reflections on social justice and personal identity. Ohio State Law Journal, 62, 391–423.

Banks

(1995). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In Banks

, & McGee Banks

(Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. (pp. 3–29). New York: Macmillan.

Bell

(1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518–533.

Berlak

(2001). Race and the achievement gap. Rethinking Schools, 15(4). Retrieved September 28, 2007, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/15_04/Race154.shtml

Blanchett

W. J.

(2006). Disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28.

Blanchett

W. J.

(2009a). A retrospective examination of urban education: From Brown to the resegregation of African Americans in special education—It is time to “go for broke.” Urban Education, 44, 370–388.

10.

Blanchett

W. J.

(2009b). The intersection of race, culture, language, and disability: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 44, 389–409.

11.

Blanchett

W. J.

(2010). Telling it like it is: The role of race, class, and culture in the perpetuation of learning disability as a privileged category for the White middle class. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/1233/1280

12.

Blanchett

W. J.

, Klingner

, & Harry

(2009). The intersection of race, culture, language, and disability: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 44, 389–409.

13.

Brice Heath

(1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Donnor

J. K.

(2005) Towards an interest-convergence in the education of African-American football student athletes in major college sports. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 45–67.

15.

Erevelles

, Kanga

, & Middleton

(2006). How does it feel to be a problem? Race, disability, and exclusion in educational policy. In Brantlinger

(Ed.), Who benefits from special education? Remediating [fixing] other people's children. (pp. 77–99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Ferri

(2008). Changing the script: Race and disability in Lynn Manning's “Weights.” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12, 497–509.

17.

Ferri

, & Connor

(2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 453–474.

18.

Gatto

(2005). Dumbing us down: The hidden curriculum of compulsory schooling. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society.

19.

Gay

(2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

20.

Giroux

(1983). Theory and resistance in education: Pedagogy for the opposition. New York: Bergin and Garvey.

21.

Giroux

(1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

22.

Graham

, & Slee

(2008). Inclusion? In Gabel

S. L.

, & Danforth

(Eds.), Disability and the politics of education: An international reader. (pp. 81–99). New York: Peter Lang.

23.

Harry

, Kalyanpur

, & Day

(1999). Building cultural reciprocity with families: Case studies in special education. Baltimore: Brookes.

24.

Hilliard

A. G.

(1992). Behavioral style, culture, and teaching and learning. Journal of Negro Education, 61, 370–377.

25.

Illich

(1971). Deschooling society. New York: Marion Boyers.

26.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. H.R.1350. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:h.1350.enr:

27.

Irvine

J. J.

, & York

D. E.

(2001). Learning styles and culturally diverse students: A literature review. In Banks

J. A.

, & Banks

C. A. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. (pp. 484–497). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

28.

Kincheloe

, & Steinberg

(1997). Changing multiculturalism. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

29.

Klingner

J. K.

, Artiles

A. J.

, Kozleski

, Harry

, Zion

, Tate

(2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38), 1–42.

30.

Ladson-Billings

(1998). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education? Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.

31.

Lareau

(2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in Black families and White families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776.

32.

Lund

(2003). Educating for social justice: Making sense of multicultural and antiracist theory and practice with Canadian teacher activists. Intercultural Education, 14(1), 3–16.

33.

Lynn

, & Parker

(2006). Critical race studies in education: Examining a decade of research on U.S. schools. Urban Review, 38, 257–590.

34.

McCarthy

(1993). Multicultural approaches to racial inequality in the United States. In Castenell

, & Pinar

(Eds.), Understanding curriculum as racial test: Representation of identity and difference in education. (p. 225–246). Albany: State University of New York Press.

35.

McLaren

(1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundation of education. New York: Longman.

36.

McLaren

(1997). Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

37.

Milner

R. H.

(2008). Critical race theory and interest convergence as analytic tools in teacher education policies and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 332–346.

38.

National Center on Education and the Economy. (2007). Tough choices or tough times: The report of the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

39.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 6301 et seq. (2002 Supp.).

40.

Passeron

, & Bourdieu

(1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.

41.

Reid

D. K.

, & Knight

M. G.

(2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 18–23.

42.

Sleeter

C. E.

(2001). Culture, difference and power. New York: Teachers College Press.

43.

Springs

(2005). American education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

44.

Stein

(2004). The culture of education policy. New York: Teachers College Press.

45.

Tate

W. F.

(1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22, 195–247.

46.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2009). 28th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2006. Washington, DC: Author.