A Critical Look at Choice Options as Solutions to Milwaukee's Schooling Inequities

Abstract

Background/Context

The lack of court-ordered support for race-based policies that maintain and create integrated schools has forced communities of color to seek other avenues to obtain equitable education, such as school choice. Individual states and the federal government, as seen in grant provisions through the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, are encouraging the expansion of choice at the very time that options for increasing student diversity, particularly racial diversity, are being narrowed by the courts.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

The article uses critical race theory to examine the outcomes of specific school reforms, based on market theory models of school choice, that were designed to alleviate schooling inequities in urban districts.

Setting

The context of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, serves as a microcosm of urban districts that have embraced school choice to create more equitable schooling options. Milwaukee, like most metropolitan areas, has a history of court-ordered desegregation that served as a temporary solution to racially segregated schools. Given the federal and district court turn from supporting race-based desegregation policies in schools, Milwaukee and other metropolitan districts are looking for new models to serve students of color in their districts and cities.

Research Design

This article is a conceptual paper that incorporates data from a variety of sources to support the authors’ conclusions.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data for this project were taken from the U.S. Census Bureau, documents from newly created small high schools, such as Web sites and curriculum designs; current newspaper articles discussing issues of small high schools; archival newspaper articles documenting the creation of the 1990 choice and charter programs; professional experiences as a member of the Bill and Melinda Gates institutional selection and small-school team support system; and an empirical study that documents teachers’ attempts to provide curriculum and instruction in newly created small schools.

Conclusions/Recommendations

In combination, these data sources tell the story of market theory reforms that will continue to struggle to meet reformists’ goals to serve all Milwaukee populations so long as policy makers and the courts continue to deny the irrefutable power that race and class exercise in parental choice in U.S. urban schools.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amos v. Board of School Directors, 408 F. Supp. 765 (E.D. Wis. 1976).

Ancess

, & Allen

(2006). Implementing small theme high schools in New York City: Great intentions and great tensions. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 401–416.

Bell

D. A.

(1995). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest convergence dilemma. In Crenshaw

, Gotanda

, Peller

, & Thomas

(Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 20–45). New York: New Press.

Bell

D. A.

(2004). Silent covenants: Brown v Board of Education and the unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).

Bonilla-Silva

(2006). Racism without racists: Colorblind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (2nd ed.) Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.

Browne-Marshall

G. J.

(2007). Race, law, and American society: 1607 to present. New York: Routledge.

Burmaster

(2009). Charter schools in Wisconsin. Retrieved May 28, 2009, from Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Web site: http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/sms/csindex.html

Caldas

S. J.

, & Bankston

C. L.

(2005). Forced to fail: The paradox of school desegregation. Westport, CT: Praeger.

10.

Charne

I. B.

(2005). The Milwaukee cases. Marquette Law Review, 89(1), 83–85.

11.

Chubb

J. E.

, & Moe

T. M.

(1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

12.

Crenshaw

(1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformations and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1331–1387.

13.

Crenshaw

K. W.

(1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In Crenshaw

, Gotanda

, Peller

, & Thomas

(Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–383). New York: New Press.

14.

Crenshaw

(2001). Ahead to the past: The politics of Plessy. Black Renaissance: Renaissance Noire, 3(2), 9–13.

15.

Dougherty

(2004). More than one struggle: The evolution of Black school reform in Milwaukee. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

16.

Finn

C. E.

(2008). Lessons learned: A self-styled “troublemaker” shares wisdom gleaned from 57 years in education. Education Week, 27(25) 28, 36.

17.

Frankenberg

, Lee

, & Orfield

(2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472347).

18.

Friedman

(1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

19.

Henig

J. R.

(1994). Rethinking school choice: The limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

20.

Irons

(2002). Jim Crow's children. New York: Penguin.

21.

Irvine

J. J.

, & Irvine

R. W.

(2007). The impact of the desegregation process on the education of Black students: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Negro Education, 76, 297–305.

22.

Kahlenberg

(2007). Rescuing Brown v. Board of Education: Profiles of twelve school districts pursuing socioeconomic school integration. New York: Century Foundation.

23.

Kahne

J. E.

, Sporte

S. E.

, & Easton

J. Q.

(2005). Creating small schools in Chicago: An early look at implementation and impact. Improving Schools, 8(1), 7–22.

24.

Ladson-Billings

(2007). Can we at least have Plessy? The struggle for quality education North Carolina Law Review, 85(5), 1–13.

25.

Lewis

(2005). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classroom and communities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

26.

Linn

R. L.

, & Welner

K. G.

(2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the supreme court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

27.

Manning v. The School Board of Hillsborough County Florida, 244 F3d 927 (11th Cir. 2001).

28.

Milner

H. R.

, & Howard

T. C.

(2004). Black teachers, Black students, Black communities, and Brown: Perspectives and insights from experts. Journal of Negro Education, 73, 285–297.

29.

Milwaukee Public Schools. (2009). District fact sheet. Retrieved May 28, 2009, from Milwaukee Public Schools Web site: http://mpsportal.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=367&mode=2&in_hi_userid=2&cached=true

30.

Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995).

31.

Orfield

, & Lee

(2004). Brown at 50: King's dream or Plessy's nightmare? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489168)

32.

Pedroni

T. C.

(2006). Acting neoliberal: Is Black support for vouchers a rejection of progressive educational values? Educational Studies, 40, 265–278.

33.

People Who Care, et al. v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205, 246 F3d 1073 (7th Cir. 2001).

34.

Public Policy Forum. (2006). Public education in Milwaukee: A survey of public opinion. Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicyforum.org/pdfs/MPSSurveyReport.pdf

35.

Saporito

, & Sohoni

(2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79, 81–105.

36.

Schmidt

, & Dickman

(2009). After a decade of choice, voucher schools look like MPS. Public Policy Forum Research Brief, 97(2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED50445)

37.

Scott

J. T.

(Ed.). (2005). School choice and diversity: What the evidence says. New York: Teachers College Press.

38.

Shaw

(2006). Foundation's small-schools experiment has yet to yield big results. The Seattle Times. Retrieved November 10, 2006, from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003348701_gates05m.html

39.

Squires

G. D.

, & Velez

(1987). Insurance redlining and the transformation of an urban metropolis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 63–83.

40.

Tate

W. F.

(1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In Apple

(Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 22, pp. 191–243). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

41.

Toch

(2003). High schools on a human scale: How small schools can transform American education. Boston: Beacon Press.

42.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). 2005 American Community Study. Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/

43.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). 2005–2007 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates Retrieved May 28, 2009, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=16000US5553000&-qr_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_S0101&-ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_

44.

VanDunk

, & Dickman

A. M.

(2003). School choice and the question of accountability: The Milwaukee experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

45.

Wells

A. S.

(Ed.). (2002). Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity. New York: Teachers College Press.

46.

Wells

A. S.

, Holme

J. J.

, López

, & Cooper

C. W.

(2000). Charter schools and racial and social class segregation: Yet another sorting machine? In Kahlenberg

(Ed.), A notion at risk: Preserving public education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 169–221). New York City: Century Foundation.

47.

Welner

K. G.

(2006). K–12 race-conscious student assignment policies: Law, social science, and diversity. Review of Educational Research, 76, 349–382.

48.

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2007). Charter schools in Wisconsin. Retrieved July 25, 2007, from http://dpi.wi.gov/sms/csindex.html

49.

Wolf

P. J.

(2008). The comprehensive longitudinal evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program: Summary of baseline reports. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas.