BoekaertsM. (2011). What have we learned about the social context–student engagement link?Teachers College Record, 113(6).
2.
CornoL., & MandinachE. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In McInerneyD. M. & Van EttenS. (Eds.), Big theories revisited: Vol. 4. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 299–328). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
3.
HadwinA., & OshigeM. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(6).
4.
JärveläS., & JärvenojaH. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(6).
5.
KaplanA., LichtingerE., & MargulisM. (2011). The situated dynamics of purposes of engagement and self-regulation strategies: A mixed-methods case study of writing. Teachers College Record, 113(6).
6.
McCaslinM., & BurrossH. L. (2011). Research on individual differences within a socio-cultural perspective: Co-regulation and adaptive learning. Teachers College Record, 113(6).
7.
WoltersC. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(6).
8.
ZimmermanB. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.