AchugarM., SchleppegrellM., & OteízaT. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistic approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Technique, 6(2), 8–24.
2.
AdamsonH. D. (1993). Academic competence: Theory and classroom practice: Preparing ESL students for content courses. White Plains, NY: Longman.
3.
Aguirre-MuñosZ., ParkJ.-E., AmabiscaA., & BoscardinC. K. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs’ writing instructional needs: A case for systematic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31, 295–322.
4.
AndrewsS. (1999). Why do L2 teachers need to know about language? Teacher metalinguistic awareness and input for learning. Language and Education, 13(3), 161–177.
5.
AndrewsS. (2003). Teaching language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81–95.
6.
BacaL., & EscamillaK. (2002). Educating teachers about language. In AdgerC. T., SnowC. E., & ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 71–84). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
7.
BachmanL. F., & PalmerA. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
BaileyA. L. (Ed.). (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
BallA. F. (2008). Toward a theory of generative change in culturally and linguistically complex classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 45–72.
10.
BarnesD. (1992). From communication to curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
11.
BartoloméL. I. (1998). The misteaching of academic discourses: The politics of language in the classroom. Oxford, UK: Westview Press.
12.
BartoloméL. I. (2002). Creating an equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, border crossers, and cultural brokers. In BeykontZ. F. (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
13.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In HolquistC. E. M. (Ed.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60–102). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
14.
BattleD. (2009). Characteristics of public, private, and Bureau of Indian Education elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2007-2008 schools and staffing survey (NCES 2009-323). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
15.
BiberD., ConradS., ReppenR., ByrdP., & HeltM. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 9–48.
16.
BikleK., & BunchG. C. (2002). CLAD in STEP: One program's efforts to prepare teachers for linguistic and cultural diversity. Issues in Teacher Education, 11(1), 85–97.
17.
BlockD. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18.
BriskM. E. (Ed.). (2008a). Language, culture, and community in teacher education. New York: Routledge.
19.
BriskM. E. (2008b). Program and faculty transformation: Enhancing teacher preparation. In BriskM. E. (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 249–266). New York: Routledge.
20.
BunchG. C. (2006). “Academic English” in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 284–301.
21.
BunchG. C. (2009). “Going up there”: Challenges and opportunities for language minority students during a mainstream classroom speech event. Linguistics and Education, 20, 81–108.
22.
BunchG. C. (in press). The language of ideas and the language of display: Expanding conceptions of “academic language” in linguistically diverse classrooms. In RolstadK. (Ed.), Rethinking school language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
BunchG. C., AguirreJ. M., & TéllezK. (2009). Beyond the scores: Using candidate responses on high stakes performance assessment to inform teacher preparation for English learners. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 103–127.
24.
BunchG. C., LotanR., ValdésG., & CohenE. (2005). Keeping content at the heart of content-based instruction: Access and support for transitional English learners. In CrandallJ. & KaufmanD. (Eds.), Content-based instruction in primary and secondary school settings (pp. 11–25). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
25.
BuxtonC., LeeO., & SantauA. (2008). Promoting science among English language learners: Professional development for today's culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 495–511.
26.
CazdenC. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan.
27.
ChristianD. (2006). Foreword. In TéllezK. & WaxmanH. C. (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practice (pp. vii–ix). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
ClaytonC., BarnhardtR., & BriskM. E. (2008). Language, culture, identity. In BriskM. E. (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 47–70). New York: Routledge.
29.
CoffinC. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London, UK: Continuum.
CopeB., & KalantzisM. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
32.
CorsonD. (1997). The learning and use of academic English words. Language Learning, 47(4), 671–718.
33.
CostaJ., McPhailG., SmithJ., & BriskM. E. (2005). Faculty first: The challenge of infusing the teacher education curriculum with scholarship on English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2), 104–118.
34.
CumminsJ. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
35.
CumminsJ. (1984a). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36.
CumminsJ. (1984b). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In RiveraC. (Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement (pp. 2–19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
37.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
38.
CumminsJ. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In StreetB. & HornbergerN. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 2 Literacy (2nd ed., pp. 71–83). New York: Springer.
39.
DaltonS. S. (1998). Pedagogy matters: Standards for effective teaching practice. Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence, Center for Applied Linguistics.
40.
de JongE. J., & HarperC. A. (2008). ESL is good teaching “plus”: Preparing standard curriculum teachers for all learners. In BriskM. E. (Ed.), Program and faculty transformation: Enhancing teacher preparation (pp. 127–148). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
EchevarríaJ., VogtM., & ShortD. J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for secondary English learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
42.
EdelskyC. (1990). With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education. London: Falmer Press.
43.
EvansC., Arnot-HopfferE., & JurichD. (2005). Making ends meet: Bringing bilingual education and mainstream students together to preservice teacher education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(1), 75–88.
44.
FaltisC. J., AriasB., & Ramiréz-MarínF. (2009). Building consensus: Critical competencies for secondary teachers of English learners. Paper presented at the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
45.
FaltisC. J., & CoulterC. A. (2008). Teaching English learners and immigration students in secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
46.
FarrB., & Richardson BrunaK. (2005). Second-language acquisition and development. In TrumbullE. & FarrB., Language and learning: What teachers need to know. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
47.
FergusonC. A. (1994). Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In BiberD. & FineganE. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 15–30). New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Feiman-NemserS. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach? In Cochran-SmithM., Feiman-NemserS., McIntyreJ., & DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 697–705). New York: Routledge.
49.
FillmoreL. W. (1982). Instructional language as linguistic input: Second language learning in classrooms. In WilkinsonL. C. (Ed.), Communication in the classroom. New York: Academic Press.
50.
FillmoreL. W. (1991). Second language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In WilkinsonL. C. (Ed.), Language processing by bilingual children (pp. 49–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
FillmoreL. W., & SnowC. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In AdgerC. T., SnowC. E., & ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
52.
FreemanY. S., & FreemanD. E. (2009). Academic language for English language learners and struggling readers: How to help students succeed across content areas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
53.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
54.
GándaraP., & Maxwell-JollyJ. (2006). Critical issues in developing the teacher corps for English learners. In TéllezK. & WaxmanH. C. (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practice (pp. 99–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55.
GassS. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
GebhardM., AustinT., NietoS., & WillettJ. (2002). “You can't step on someone else's words”: Preparing all teachers to teach language minority students. In BeykontZ. F. (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference (pp. 219–244). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
57.
GebhardM., & WillettJ. (2008). Social to academic: University-school district partnership helps teachers broaden students’ language skills. Journal of Staff Development, 29(1), 41–45.
58.
GeeJ. P. (2003). Decontextualized language: A problem, not a solution. Paper presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Bilingual Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
59.
GeneseeF. (Ed.). (1999). Program alternatives for linguistically diverse students. Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence, Center for Applied Linguistics.
60.
GeneseeF., Lindholm-LearyK., SaundersW. M., & ChristianD. (Eds.). (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
GibbonsP. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
62.
GibbonsP. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273.
63.
GibbonsP. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
64.
GoldenbergC. (2008). Teaching English learners: What the research does—and does not—say. American Educator, 32(2), 8–23, 42–44.
65.
GollnickD. M. (2002). Incorporating linguistic knowledge in standards for teacher performance. In AdgerC. T., SnowC. E., & ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 103–112). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
66.
GonzálezJ. M., & Darling-HammondL. (1997). New concepts for new challenges: Professional development for teachers of immigrant youth. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
67.
GutiérrezK. D. (1995). Unpackaging academic discourse. Discourse Processes, 19, 21–37.
68.
HakutaK., Goto ButlerY., & WittD. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? Policy Report 2000-1. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
69.
HallidayM. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
70.
HallidayM. A. K., & HasanR. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
71.
HallidayM. A. K., & MartinJ. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
72.
HammernessK., Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73.
HarperC., & de JongE. J. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English-language learners. Journal for Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(2), 152–162.
74.
HawkinsM. R. (2004). Researching English language and literacy development in schools. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 14–25.
75.
HymesD. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In GumperzJ. & HymesD. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
76.
JohnsA. M. (Ed.). (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77.
KorthagenF. A. J., & KesselsJ. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
78.
KrashenS. D. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
79.
LantolfJ. L., & ThorneS. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
80.
LightbownP. M., & SpadaN. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
LucasT., & GrinbergJ. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In Cochran-SmithM., Feiman-NemserS., McIntyreD. J., & DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 606–636). New York: Routledge.
82.
LucasT., VillegasA. M., & Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373.
83.
MacSwanJ., & RolstadK. (2003). Linguistic diversity, schooling, and social class: Rethinking our conception of language proficiency in language minority education. In PaulstonC. B. & TuckerG. R. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: The essential readings (pp. 329–340). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
84.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
MerinoB. J. (1999). Preparing secondary teachers to teach a second language: The case of the United States with a focus on California. In FaltisC. J. & WolfeP. (Eds.), So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism, & ESL in the secondary school (pp. 225–254). New York: Teachers College Press.
86.
MojeE. B., CollazoT., CarrilloR., & MarxR. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–496.
87.
MoschkovichJ. (1999). Understanding the needs of Latino students in reform-oriented mathematics classrooms. In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. De La Cruz (Eds.). Changing the faces of mathematics (Vol. 4): Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 5–12). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
88.
MoschkovichJ. (2007a). Beyond words to mathematical content: Assessing English learners in the mathematics classroom. In SchoenfeldA. (Ed.), Assessing mathematical proficiency (pp. 345–352). New York: Cambridge University Press.
89.
MoschkovichJ. (2007b). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
90.
NationI. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
91.
Nevárez-LaTorreA. A., Sanford-DeShieldsJ. S., SoundyC., LeonardJ., & WoyshnerC. (2008). Faculty perspectives on integrating linguistic diversity issues into an urban teacher education program. In BriskM. E. (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 267–312). New York: Routledge.
92.
NietoS. (2000). Placing equality front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 180–187.
93.
PhilipsS. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classrooms. In CazdenC. B., JohnV. P., & HymesD. (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
94.
PimmD. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
95.
RenshawP., & BrownR. A. J. (2007). Formats of classroom talk for integrating everyday and scientific discourse: Replacement, interweaving, contextual privileging and pastiche. Language and Education, 21(6), 531–549.
96.
RichardsonV. (2002). Teacher knowledge about language. In AdgerC. T., SnowC. E., & ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 85–102). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
97.
Richardon BrunaK., VannR., & Perales EscuderoM. (2007). What's language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in a high school “English Learner Science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 36–54.
98.
RiveraC. (Ed.). (1984). Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
99.
RolstadK. (Ed.). (in press). Rethinking school language. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100.
ScarcellaR. C. (2003). Accelerated academic English: A focus on the English learner. Oakland, CA: Regents of the University of California.
101.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
102.
SchleppegrellM. J., & AchugarM. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21–27.
103.
SchleppegrellM. J., AchugarM., & OteízaT. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 67–93.
104.
SchleppegrellM. J., & ColombiM. C. (Eds.). (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
105.
SchleppegrellM. J., & de OliveiraL. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 254–268.
106.
SchleppegrellM. J., & GoA. L. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529–538.
107.
SnowC. E. (2002). Epilogue. In AdgerC. T., SnowC. E. & ChristianD. (Eds.). What teachers need to know about language (pp. 123–130). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
108.
SolomonJ., & RhodesN. C. (1995). Conceptualizing academic language (Research Report No. 15). Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
109.
SpolskyB. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
110.
StoddartT., PinalA., LatzkeM., & CanadayD. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664–687.
111.
SwainM. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In CookG. & SeidlehoferB. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied learning: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
112.
SwalesJ. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
113.
TedickD. J. (2005). Second language teacher education: International perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114.
TESOL (2006). PreK–12 English language proficiency standards. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
115.
TéllezK., & WaxmanH. C. (2006a). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on effective teaching practices for English learners. In NorrisJ. M. & OrtegaL. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 245–277). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
116.
TéllezK., & WaxmanH. C. (2006b). Preparing quality educators for English language learners: An overview of the critical issues. In TéllezK. & WaxmanH. C. (Eds.) Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
117.
TéllezK., & WaxmanH. C. (2006c). Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
118.
ThomasW. P., & CollierV. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA, and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
119.
TrumbullE., & FarrB. (2005). Language and learning: What teachers need to know. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
120.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2009). Teacher preparation: Multiple federal education offices support teacher preparation for instructing students with disabilities and English language learners, but systematic departmentwide coordination could enhance this assistance. Washington, DC: Author.
121.
UnsworthL. (Ed.). (2000). Researching language in schools and communities. London: Cassell.
122.
ValdésG. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
123.
ValdésG. (2004). Between support and marginalisation: The development of academic language in linguistic minority children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(2-3), 102–132.
124.
ValdésG., BunchG. C., SnowC. E., & LeeC. (2005). Enhancing the development of students’ language(s). In Darling-HammondL., BransfordJ., LePageP., HammernessK. & DuffyH. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 126–168). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
125.
ValdésG., & Geoffrion-VinciM. (1998). Chicano Spanish: The problem of the ‘underdeveloped’ code in bilingual repertoires. Modern Language Journal, 82(iv), 473–501.
126.
VeelR. (1997). Learning how to mean—scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In ChristieF. & MartinJ. R. (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 160–195). London: Cassell.
127.
VerplaetseL. S., & MigliacciN. (Eds.). (2008). Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
128.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
129.
VygotskyL. (1987). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
130.
WalquiA. (2000). Strategies for success: Engaging immigrant students in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
131.
WalquiA. (2008). The development of teacher expertise to work with adolescent English learners: A model and a few priorities. In VerplaetseL. S. & MigliacciN. (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogy for English Language Learners: A handbook of research-informed practice (pp. 103–126). New York: Taylor & Francis.
132.
WalquiA., & van LierL. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
133.
WalkerC. L., RanneyS., & FortuneT. W. (2005). Preparing pre-service teachers for English language learners: A content-based approach. In TedickD. J. (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 313–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
134.
WellsG. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
135.
ZwiersJ. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.