CoburnC. E., HonigM. I., & SteinM. K. (2009). What's the evidence on district's use of evidence? In BransfordJ. D., StipekD. J., VyeN. J., GomezL. M. & LamD. (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (pp. 67–87). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press
5.
CousinsJ. B., & EarlL. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397–414.
6.
CousinsJ. B., & WhitmoreE. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5–23.
7.
CronbachL. J., AmbronS. R., DornbuschS. M., HessR. D., HornikR. C., PhillipsD. C. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CrowleyT. (2002). Bakhtin and the history of language. In HirschkopK. & ShepherdD. (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (2nd ed., pp. 177–200).
9.
DynarskiM. (2006). Advancing the use of scientifically based research in forming policy: A response to Mahoney and Zigler. Applied Developmental Science, 27, 295–297.
10.
DynarskiM., AgodiniR., HeavisideS., CareyN., CampuzanoL., MeansB. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
11.
DynarskiM., James-BurdumyS., MooreM., RosenbergL., DekeJ., MansfieldW. (2004). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program: New findings. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education.
12.
EisenhartM., & TowneL. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31–38.
13.
FettermanD. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15.
14.
FettermanD. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
GallagherL. P., & PenuelW. R. (2009, April). Preparing teachers to design instruction in middle school Earth science: Impacts of three professional development programs on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
16.
GamseB. C., JacobR. T., HorstM., BoulayB., UnluF., BozziL. (2008). Reading First impact study: Final report. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
17.
GreeneJ. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. American Journal of Evaluation, 18, 25–35.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In WilliamsD. (Ed.), New directions for evaluation (pp. 73–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
JacksonR., McCoyA., PistorinoC., WilkinsonA., BurghardtJ., ClarkM. (2007). National evaluation of Early Reading First: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
23.
James-BurdumyS., DynarskiM., MooreM., DekeJ., MansfieldW., PistorinoC. (2005). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
24.
The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
LincolnY., & GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
McDermottR. (2010). The passions of learning in tight circumstances: Toward a political economy of the mind. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1).
27.
MossM., FountainA. R., BoulayB., HorstM., RodgerC., & Brown-LyonsM. (2008). Reading First implementation evaluation: Final report. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, U.S. Department of Education.
28.
National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
30.
O'DonnellC. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
31.
PenuelW. R., & GallagherL. P. (2009). Comparing three approaches to preparing teachers to teach for deep understanding in Earth science: Short-term impacts on teachers and teaching practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 461–508.
32.
RabinowP., & SullivanW. M. (Eds.). (1987). Interpretive social science: A second look. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
RemillardJ. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.