AresN. (2010) Political and cultural dimensions of organizing learning around funds of knowledge. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1).
2.
BeachK. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139.
3.
CivilM. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In NasirN. S. & CobbP. (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
de AbreuG. (1995). Understanding how children experience the relationship between home and school mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(2), 119–142.
5.
de la RochaO. (1985). The reorganization of arithmetic practice in the kitchen. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 193–198.
6.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. New York: Dover.
7.
DeweyJ. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch and Company.
8.
EsmondeI., BlairK. P., GoldmanS., MartinL., JimenezO., & PeaR. (in press). Math I Am: What we learn from stories that people tell about math in their lives. In BevanB., BellP., & StevensR. (Eds.), Learning outside school time. New York: Springer.
9.
GeertzC. (1962). The rotating credit association: A “middle rung” in development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10, 241–263.
10.
GoldmanS. (2005). A new angle on families: Connecting the mathematics in daily life with school mathematics. In BekermanZ., BurbulesN., & Silberman-KellerD. (Eds.), Learning in places: the informal education reader (pp. 55–76). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
11.
GonzálezN., AndradeR., CivilM., & MollL. C. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1–2), 115–132.
12.
GonzálezN., MollL. C., & AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
HallR., & StevensR. (1995). Making space: a comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practices. In StarS. L. (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 118–145). London: Basil Blackwell.
15.
HoylesC., NossR., & PossiS. (2001). Mathematising in practice. In HoylesC., MorganC., & WoodhouseG. (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 48–62). London: Falmer Press.
16.
KaplanB. (1992). Strife of systems. Tension between organismic and developmental points of view. Theory and Psychology, 2, 431–443.
17.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LaveJ., MurtaughM., & de la RochaO. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In RogoffB. & LaveJ. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LeviasS. (2008, February). How leading values organize consequential financial practices in family life. Poster presented at the first annual inter-Science of Learning Centers Conference (iSLC), Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
21.
MartinL., & GoldmanS. (2010). Family inheritance: Parallel practices of financial responsibility in families. In LinL., VarenneH., & GordonE.W. (Eds.), Educating comprehensively: Varieties of educational experiences (Vol. 3). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
22.
MartinL. M., GoldmanS., & JiménezO. (2009). The tanda: A practice at the intersection of mathematics, culture, and financial goals. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 338–352.
23.
McDermottR., & WeberV. (1998). When is math or science? In GreenoJ. G. & GoldmanS. V. (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 321–339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.
25.
MurtaughM. (1985). The practice of arithmetic by American grocery shoppers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 186–192.
26.
NasirN. (2000). “Points ain't everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31, 283–305.
27.
NunesT., SchliemannA. D., & CarraherD. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
O'ConnorK., & AllenA. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1).
29.
O'ConnorK., & PenuelW. R. (in press). Organizing learning at both ends of the trajectory. Theory and Psychology.
30.
PeaR. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
PeaR. D., & KurlandD. M. (1987). Cognitive technologies for writing development. In FraseL. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 14, pp. 277–326). Washington DC: AERA Press.
32.
PeaR., MartinL., BookerA., BlairK. P., & GoldmanS. (2007, April). The people behind the numbers: Using qualitative and quantitative methods to characterize family engagement in math. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
33.
PikeK. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
34.
PolyaG. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical problem solving (2nd ed.) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1945)
35.
SaxeG. (1990). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
37.
ScribnerS. (1984). Cognitive studies of work [Special issue]. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 6(1, 2).
38.
Simon, H., & Associates. (1986). Decision making and problem solving. In Research Briefings 1986: Report of the Research. Briefing Panel on Decision Making and Problem Solving (pp. 19–35). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40.
StarS. L., & GriesemerJ.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations,” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
41.
StevensR. (2000). Who counts what as math? Emergent and assigned mathematics problems in a project-based classroom. In BoalerJ. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 105–144). Westport CT: Ablex.
42.
Vélez-IbañezC. G. (1983). Bonds of mutual trust: The cultural systems of rotating credit associations among urban Mexicans and Chicanos. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
WernerH., & KaplanB. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.