The United States is currently undergoing a period of unprecedented immigration, with the majority of new arrivals coming from Asia and Latin America, not Europe. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (APIs) represent the fastest growing racial group in the United States, and schools are again being asked to socialize newcomer students, many of whom are APIs. Yet, even as the United States becomes more racially diverse, the national mindset regarding immigrants and immigration ranges from ambivalent to increasingly (and currently) hostile, and is often contradictory. “American” typically is imagined as “White,” and perceptions of APIs and people of color as “other” remain cemented in our collective psyche. It is this sociohistorical-political context that frames the education and socialization of Asian American citizens, immigrants, and their children.
Objective/Focus
As APIs are absorbed into the fabric of society, how will they define themselves? How will they be defined? This article begins by deconstructing the social category Asian and Pacific Islander in order to reveal the immense diversity contained under this label. The discussion illuminates both the horizontal diversity of APIs—differences between ethnic groups, and vertical diversity—differences within ethnic groups, to underscore the insufficiency of the API label. Against the diverse backdrop that APIs truly (re)present, (Asian) American education framed by three curricular contexts in the United States—the major reforms of the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act, culturally relevant pedagogy, and the “model minority” mythology—is theorized using postcolonial theory as an analytic lens. The article concludes with thoughts on how APIs can resist domination and what might be sites of resistance in schools or society.
Research Design
This is an analytic essay that examines both historical and contemporary educational and policy contexts.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Curriculum, defined not simply as subject matter content and instructional procedures, but as a tool of acculturation and a depository of (U.S.) national and cultural values, has the power to emancipate or colonize. Each of the three curricular contexts in the United States—the major reforms of the No Child Left Behind Act, culturally relevant pedagogy, and the “model minority” mythology—exemplify the role Curriculum plays in defining, silencing, and/or marginalizing APIs. Imagined sites of resistance against Curriculum as colonizer include this very page, where one voice deliberately pushes back against the obfuscation of fixed realities layered onto people of Asian descent in the United States, the reexamination and revision(ing) of teacher preparation curricula, and the larger policy arena.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
2.
AppleM. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
3.
ArchiboldN. (2010, April 23).Arizona enacts stringent law on immigration. New York Times, p. A1.
4.
AshcroftB., GriffithsG., & TiffinH. (2000). Post-colonial studies: The key concepts. New York: Routledge.
5.
AshcroftB., GriffithsG., & TiffinH. (1989). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. London, UK: Routledge.
6.
Asian Pacific American Legal Center (2004). The diverse face of Asians and Pacific Islanders in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
7.
BanksC. A. M. (2005). Improving multicultural education: Lessons from the Intergroup Education Movement. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BanksJ. (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. NY: Teachers College Press.
BartolomeL. I., & MacedoD. P. (1997).Dancing with bigotry: The poisoning of racial and ethnic identities. Harvard Educational Review, 67(2), 222–246.
11.
BhabhaH. K. (1996). The other question. In MongiaP. (Ed.), Contemporary postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 37–54). New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
13.
BishopC. H. (1938). The five Chinese brothers. New York: Penguin Putnam Books.
14.
BowlesS. & GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America.London: Routledge
15.
CamarotaS. A. (August, 2007). 100 million more: Projecting the impact of immigration on the U.S. population, 2007 to 2060. Retrieved December 13, 2010, from http://www.cis.org/impact_on_population.html
16.
CamarotaS. A. (2007, November). Immigrants in the United States, 2007; A profile of America's foreign-born population. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://www.cis.org/articles/2007/back1007.pdf
17.
CappsR., FixM. E., MurrayJ., OstJ., PasselJ. S., & HerwantoroS. (2005). The new demography of America's schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act.Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute.
18.
CarterR. T., & GoodwinA.L. (1994). Racial identity and education. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 20, pp. 291–336).Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19.
Center for Education Statistics. (1987). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
ChaeH. S. (2004).Talking back to the Asian model minority discourse: Korean-origin youth experiences in high school. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25(1), 59–73.
22.
ChaeH. S. (2005). Using critical race theory to explore Korean-origin working class youth's conceptualizations of identity. In ParkC. C., EndoR., & GoodwinA. L. (Eds.), Asian and Pacific American education: Learning, socialization, and identity (pp. 219–240). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
23.
ChengA. A. (2001). The melancholy of race. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
ChowR. (1993). Writing diaspora: Tactics of intervention in contemporary cultural studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25.
ChunK-T. (1995). The myth of Asian American success. In NakanishiD. T. & NishidaT. Y. (Eds.), The Asian American educational experience (pp. 95–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
Coalition for Asian American Children and Families (2004). Hidden in plain view: An overview of the needs of Asian American students in the public school system. New York: Author.
27.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (2006). Troubling images of teaching in No Child Left Behind, Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 668–697.
28.
CorcoranT. B., WalkerL.J., & WhiteJ.L. (1988). Working in urban schools. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
29.
Council of Great City Schools. (1987). Results in the making. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
DarderA. (1995). Introduction. The politics of biculturalism: Culture and difference in the formation of warriors for gringostroika and the new mestizas. In DarderA. (Ed.), Culture and difference (pp. 1–20). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
31.
Darling-HammondL. (1990). Teacher quality and inequality. In GoodladJ. I. & KeatingP. (Eds.), Access to knowledge (pp. 237–258). New York, NY: College Board.
32.
Darling-HammondL. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In BanksJ. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (pp. 465–483). New York, NY: Macmillan.
33.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). What happens to a dream deferred? The continuing quest for equal educational opportunity. In BanksJ. M. & BanksC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.) (pp. 607–630). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Darling-HammondL. (2006).No Child Left Behind and high school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 642–667.
35.
de CohenC. C., DeterdingN., & ClewellB. C. (2005). Who's left behind? Immigrant children in high and low LEP schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
36.
DilworthM. E., & BrownC.E. (2001). Consider the difference: Teaching and learning in culturally rich schools. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 643–667). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
37.
DreebenR. (1987).Closing the divide: What teachers and administrators can do to help black students reach their potential. American Educator, 11, 28–35.
Fell-EisenkraftS. (2005). Chinatown youth reflect on the discourses of September 11, 2001. In ParkC. C., EndoR. & GoodwinA. L. (Eds.), Asian and Pacific American education: Learning, socialization, and identity (pp. 51–76). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
40.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
42.
GarciaG., & PearsonP. D. (1991). Modifying reading instruction to maximize its effectiveness for “all” students. In KnappM. S. & ShieldsP. M. (Eds.), Better schooling for the children of poverty (pp. 31–60). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
43.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
GenorM., & GoodwinA. L. (2005).Confronting ourselves: Using autobiographical analysis in teacher education. The New Educator, 1(4), 311–331.
45.
GhandiL. (1998). Postcolonial theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
46.
GoodwinA. L. (Ed.). (1997a). Assessment for equity and inclusion: Embracing all our children. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
GoodwinA. L. (1997b). Historical and contemporary perspectives on multicultural teacher education: Past lessons, new directions. In KingJ. E., HollinsE. R., & HaymanW. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for cultural diversity (pp. 5–22). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
GoodwinA. L. (2000). Teachers as (multi)cultural agents in schools. In CarterR. T., (Ed.), Addressing cultural issues in organizations: Beyond the corporate context, (pp. 101–114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
GoodwinA. L. (2001). Finding my place in the academy: A personal narrative about Asian cultural centering, insider/outsider dichotomies, and buying in without selling out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
50.
GoodwinA. L. (2002a).Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Education and Urban Society, 34(2), 156–172.
51.
GoodwinA. L. (2002b).The case of one child: Making the shift from personal knowledge to professionally informed practice. Teaching Education, 13(2), 137–154.
52.
GoodwinA. L. (2002c).The social/political construction of low teacher expectations for children of color: Reexamining the achievement gap. Journal of Thought, 37(4), 83–103.
53.
GoodwinA. L. (2003). Growing up Asian in America: A search for self. In ParkC. C., GoodwinL., and LeeS. J., (Eds.), Asian American identities, families and schooling (pp. 3–26). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
54.
GoodwinA. L. (2004). Exploring the perspectives of teacher educators of color: What do they bring to teacher education?Issues in Teacher Education, 13(2), 7–24.
55.
GoodwinA. L. (2010).Globalization and the preparation of quality teachers: Rethinking knowledge domains for teaching. Teaching Education, 21(1), 19–32.
56.
GoodwinA. L., GenishiC.S., AsherN., & WooK. (1997). Voices from the margins: Asian American teachers’ experiences in the profession. In ByrdD. M. & McIntyreD. J. (Eds.), Research on the education of our nation's teachers; Teacher Education Yearbook V, (pp. 219–241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
57.
GotandaN. (1995). Re-producing the model minority stereotype: Judge Joyce Karlin's sentencing colloquy in People v. Soon Ja Du. In NgW. L., ChinS-Y, MoyJ. S., & OkihiroG. Y. (Eds.), Reviewing Asian America; Locating diversity, (pp. 87–106). Pullman: Washington State University Press.
58.
GreeneM. (1988). The dialectic of freedom.New York: Teachers College Press.
59.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
GreerC. (1972). The great school legend. New York, NY: Basic Books.
61.
GriecoE. M. (2001). The Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
62.
GrubbW. N., & LazersonM. (2004). The education gospel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
GutierrezK. D., & RogoffB. (2003).Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
64.
HallS. (1996). Cultural identity and diaspora. In MongiaP. (Ed.), Contemporary postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 110–121). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
HaskinsR., GreenbergM., & FremstadS. (2004, Summer). Federal policy for immigrant children: Room for common ground?The future of children, 14(2), 1–5.
66.
hooksb. (1995). Killing rage, ending racism. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
67.
Intercultural Cancer Council (2001, May). Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders and cancer.Houston, TX: Author. Retrieved January 20, 2005 from http://www.iccnetwork.org/cancerfacts/cfs5.htm
68.
Kana'iaupuniS. M. (2005).Ka'akalai Ku Kanaka: A call for strengths-based approaches from a Native Hawaiian perspective. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 32–38.
69.
KaomeaJ. (2003).Reading erasures and making the familiar strange: Defamiliarizing methods for research in formerly colonized and historically oppressed communities. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 14–25.
70.
KiangP. N-C. (2004).Linking strategies and interventions in Asian American studies to K–12 classrooms and teacher preparation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(2), 200–225.
71.
KincheloeJ. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (2nd ed.). NY: Peter Lang.
72.
KingC. R. (2000). Post-colonial America. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
73.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in American schools. New York, NY: Crown.
74.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995).Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 159–165.
75.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
LazarusE. (1991). Black hills white justice: The Sioux Nation versus the United States, 1775 to the present. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
77.
LeeS. J. (1996). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
78.
LeeS. J. (2005). Up against whiteness: Race, school, and immigrant youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
79.
LewJ. (2006). Asian Americans in class: Charting the achievement gap among Korean American youth.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
80.
MaedaD. K. (2005). Subject to justice: The “cultural defense” and legal construction of race, culture, and nation. In KingC. R. (Ed.), Postcolonial America (pp. 81–100). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
81.
McBrienJ. L. (2005).Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 329–364.
82.
McLarenP. (1994). Life in schools (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
83.
MillerJ. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum.New York: Peter Lang.
84.
MollL. C. (1991). Social and instructional issues in literacy instruction of “disadvantaged” students. In KnappM. S. & ShieldsP. M. (Eds.), Better schooling for the children of poverty (pp. 61–84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
85.
MongiaP. (1996). Introduction. In MongiaP. (Ed.), Contemporary postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
OakesJ. (1993). Tracking inequality and the rhetoric of reform: Why don't schools change? In ShapiroH. S. & PurpelD. E., (Eds.) Critical school issues in American education (pp. 85–102). New York, NY: Longman.
95.
Office of the White House Initiative on Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders (2001). Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: A people looking forward: Action for access and partnership in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
96.
PangV. O. (1995). Asian Pacific American students: A diverse and complex population. In BanksJ. M. & BanksC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 412–424). New York, NY: MacMillan.
97.
PangV. O. (1998). Struggling to be heard: The unmet needs of Asian Pacific American children. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
98.
PangV. O. (2005). Multicultural education: A caring-centered, reflective approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
99.
PfaelzerJ. (2007). Driven out; The forgotten war against Chinese Americans. New York: Random House.
100.
PinarW. (2004). What is curriculum theory?Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101.
RebellM. (2007).Professional rigor, public engagement and judicial review: A proposal for enhancing the validity of education adequacy studies. Teachers College Record, 109(6), 1303–1373.
102.
ReevesT. J., & BennettC.E. (2003). The Asian and Pacific Islander population in the United States: March 2002, Current Population Reports, P20–540. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
103.
ReevesT. J., & BennettC.E. (2004). We the people: Asians in the United States. Census 2000 Special Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
104.
ReidK. S. (2001).U.S. Census underscores diversity. Education Week, 20(7), 1, 18–19.
105.
RoM. (2002). Overview of Asian and Pacific Islanders in the United States and California. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Alternatives.
106.
RongX. L., & PreissleJ. (2009). Educating immigrant students in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
107.
SaidE. (1978/1994). Orientalism. New York, NY: Random House.
108.
San JuanE.Jr. (1998). Beyond postcolonial theory. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
109.
ShapiroH. S., & PurpelD. E. (Eds.). (1993). Critical school issues in American education. New York, NY: Longman.
110.
SharpeJ. (2005). Is the United States postcolonial? Transnationalism, immigration, and race. In KingC. R. (Ed.), Postcolonial America (pp. 103–121). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
111.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC., & GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
112.
SpivakG. C. (1996). Poststructuralism, marginality, postcoloniality and value. In MongiaP. (Ed.), Contemporary postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 198–222). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
113.
Suarez-OrozcoM. M. (2001).Globalization, immigration, and education: The research agenda. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 345–365.
114.
SundermanG. L., KimJ.S., & OrfieldG. (2005). NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
115.
SuzukiB. H. (1977). The Japanese-American experience. In GoldM. J., GrantC. A., & RivlinH. N. (Eds.), In praise of diversity: A resource book (pp. 139–162). Washington, DC: AACTE.
116.
TakakiR. (1989). Strangers from a distant shore. Boston: Little Brown.
117.
TalmyS. (2005). The Other Other: Micronesians in a Hawaii High School. In ParkC. C., EndoR., & GoodwinA. L. (Eds.), Asian and Pacific American education: Learning, socialization, and identity (pp. 19–50). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
118.
TrinhT. M. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
119.
TrinhT. M. (with MorelliA.). (1996). The undone interval. In ChambersI. & CurtiL. (Eds.), The post-colonial question: Common skies, divided horizons (pp. 3–16). London, UK: Routledge.
120.
TyackD. B. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
121.
U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000. Census 2000 Summary.
122.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). ESEA Blueprint for Reform. Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Washington, DC: Author.
ViruruR., & CannellaG. (2001). Postcolonial ethnography, young children, and voice. In GrieshaberS. & CannellaG. (Eds.), Embracing identities in early childhood education (pp. 158–172). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
127.
Walker-MoffatW. (1995). The other side of the Asian American success story. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
128.
WeisL. (1988). Class, race and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
129.
WeisL. (2004). Class reunion; The remaking of the American white working class. New York, NY: Routledge.
130.
WinkJ. (2005). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
131.
WuF. H. (2002). Yellow: Race in America beyond black and white.New York, NY: Basic Books.
132.
YuenJ. W. L., DowrickP. W., & AlaimaleataE. T. (2005). Community response program in literacy education. In ParkC. C., EndoR. & GoodwinA. L. (Eds.), Asian and Pacific American education: Learning, socialization, and identity (pp. 121–140). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
133.
ZhouM. (2004). Coming of age at the turn of the twenty-first century: A demographic profile of Asian American youth. In LeeJ., & ZhouM. (Eds.), Asian American youth; Culture, identity and ethnicity (pp. 33–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
134.
ZhouM., & LeeJ. (2004). Introduction: The making of culture, identity, and ethnicity among Asian American youth. In LeeJ., & ZhouM. (Eds.), Asian American youth; Culture, identity and ethnicity (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
135.
ZiaH. (2000). Asian American dreams. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
136.
ZumwaltK., & CraigE. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the demographic profile. In Cochran-SmithM. & ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 111–156).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
