Film as Identity Exploration: A Multimodal Analysis of Youth-Produced Films

Abstract

Background/Context

Researchers have begun to document and understand the work youth do as they compose in multiple media including video games, online virtual worlds, participatory fan cultural practices, and in the digital media arts. However, we lack mechanisms for analyzing the products, especially when it comes to understanding the relationship between storytelling and identity.

Objective

In this article, I bring together prior research on youth-produced media, social semiotic analysis frameworks for analyzing these products and the formal analysis of films to construct an analytic framework for understanding youth-produced films as spaces for identity construction and representation.

Research design

The research reported on in this article is the design and illustration of an analytic framework for understanding how youth construct and represent their identities through the films they make. The framework design begins with Kress and van Leeuwen's (2006) work on the analysis of visual design as a set of semiotic resources for describing how we make meaning with multimodal texts. However, this work does little to depict how the specific tools of film both cinematic (e.g., editing, cinematography) and filmic (music, action) (Burn & Parker, 2003) are used to construct and communicate identities. Therefore, I turn to film theory to develop a coding scheme that can assist in the meaningful interpretation of the phases and transitions of youth-produced films. I then illustrate this framework in action by analyzing one youth-produced film, Rules of Engagement, as a multimodal product of identity.

Conclusions/Recommendations

This analysis demonstrates how films like Rules of Engagement display the construction of a viable social identity primarily through the interactions among filmic elements. Specifically it is in the transition spaces between phases of the film where youth actively insert their understanding of how to represent complex portraits of how they see themselves, how others see them, and how they fit into their communities. Analyzing the products of a rich, complex literacy practice is a critical way to make sense of how youth engage with issues of identity through the media they create. This is especially important for youth who feel marginalized in mainstream institutions and do not have opportunities to explore a positive sense of self in traditional institutional contexts. Understanding how the construction of multimodal representation supports identity development processes can help us to bring these new media literacy practices to youth who are most in need of alternative mechanisms for engaging in positive identity work.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baldry

A. P.

(2006). The role of multimodal concordancers in multimodal corpus linguistics. In Royce

T. D.

and Bowcher

W. L.

(Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Baldry

, & Thibault

P. J.

(2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London, UK: Equinox Publishing.

Bamberg

(2004).Narrative discourse and identities. In Meister

J. C.

, Kindt

, Schernus

, & Stein

(Eds.). Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 213–237). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.

Bing-Canar

, & Zerkel

(1998).Reading the media and myself: Experiences in critical media literacy with young Arab-American women. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(3), 735–743.

Bordwell

, & Thompson

(2006). Film art: An introduction (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bruner

(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burn

, & Parker

(2001).Making your mark: Digital inscription, animation and a new visual semiotic. Education, Communication, & Information, 1(2), 155–179.

Burn

, & Parker

(2003). Analysing media texts. London, UK: Continuum.

Cohler

B. J.

(1982). Personal narrative and the life course. In Baltes

P. B.

and Brim

O. G.

(Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 205–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.

10.

Cohler

B. J.

, & Hammack

P.L.

(2007). The psychological world of the gay teenager: Social change, narrative, and “normality.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 47–59.

11.

Côté

J. E.

, & Levine

C.G.

(2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12.

Fleetwood

N. R.

(2005). Authenticating practices: Producing realness, performing youth. In Maira

and Soep

(Eds.), Youthscapes: The popular, the national, the global (pp. 155–172). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

13.

Forceville

(2007). [Review of the book Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook]. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1235–1238.

14.

Gee

J. P.

(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan.

15.

Halverson

E. R.

(2005).InsideOut: Facilitating gay youth identity development through a performance-based youth organization. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(1), 67–90.

16.

Halverson

E. R.

(2007). Listening to the voices of queer youth: The dramaturgical process as identity exploration. In Blackburn

M. V.

and Clark

(Eds.), New directions in literacy research for teaching, learning and political action. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

17.

Halverson

E. R.

(2008).From one woman to everyman: The reportability paradox in publicly performed narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 18(1), 29–52.

18.

Halverson

E. R.

, Lowenhaupt

, Gibbons

, & Bass

(in press). Conceptualizing identity in youth media arts organizations: A comparative case study. In press for E-Learning.

19.

Heath

S. B.

(2000).Seeing our way into learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 121–132.

20.

Hull

G. A.

, & Katz

(2006).Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.

21.

Hull

G. A.

, & Nelson

M.E.

(2005).Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.

22.

Ito

(in press). Mobilizing the imagination in everyday play: The case of Japanese media mixes. In Livingstone

and Drotner

(Eds.), International handbook of children, media and culture.

23.

Jenkins

(2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

24.

Jenkins

, Purushotma

, Clinton

, Weigel

, & Robison

A. J.

(2007).Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Building the field of digital media and learning. Retrieved July 29, 2007, from http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org

25.

Jocson

K. M.

(2005, February).Teacher as learner in DV poetry: Toward a praxis of engaging literacies in alternative spaces for learning. Current Issues in Education [Online journal], 8(5). Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number5/

26.

Kafai

Y. B.

, & Giang

M. T.

(in press). Virtual playgrounds: Children's multi-user virtual environments for playing and learning with science. In Willoughby

& Wood

(Eds.), Children's Learning in a Digital World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

27.

Keller-Cohen

, & Dyer

(1997).Intertexuality and the narrative of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 147–153.

28.

Kress

, & van

Leeuwen

(2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Lankshear

, & Knobel

(2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

30.

Mayer

(2000).Capturing cultural identity/creating community. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1). 57–78.

31.

Mayring

(2000).Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative social Research [Online journal]. Retrieved July 30, 2007 from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqstexte/2–00/2–00mayring-e.htm

32.

McAdams

D. P.

(2001).The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.

33.

McAdams

D. P.

(2003). Identity and the life story. In Fivush

& Haden

(Eds.), Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives (pp, 187–207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

Miller

, & Stam

(2004). A companion to film theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

35.

Mishler

E. G.

(1999). Storylines: Craftartists’ narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

36.

Muller

(2006). Film as film: Using movies to help students visualize literary theory. English Journal, 95(3), 32–38.

37.

NAMAC (2003). A closer look 2003: Case studies from NAMAC's youth media initiative. San Francisco, CA: NAMAC.

38.

Polkinghorne

(1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

39.

Potter

(2005).“This brings back a lot of memories”—a case study in the analysis of digital video production by young learners. Education, Communication, & Information, 5(1), 5–22.

40.

Prensky

(2001).Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

41.

Schank

(1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.

42.

Schneider

(2005). “Jackie Chan is nobody, and so am I”: Juvenile fan culture and the construction of transnational male identity in the Tamil diaspora. In Maira

and Soep

(Eds.), Youthscapes: The popular, the national, the global (pp. 137–171). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

43.

Soep

(2006).Critique: Assessment and the production of learning. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 748–777.

44.

Squire

K. D.

(2006).From content to context: Videogames as designed experiences. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.

45.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

46.

Stake

R. E.

(2000). Case studies. In, Denzin

N. K.

& Guba

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

47.

Steinkuehler

C. A.

(2006).Massively multiplayer online videogaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 38–52.

48.

Strauss

, & Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

49.

van Leeuwen

(1985). Rhythmic structure of the film text. In van Dijk

T. A.

(Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication (pp. 216–232). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.

50.

Vargas

(2006).Transnational media literacy: Analytic reflections on a program with Latina teens. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(2), 267–285.

51.

Wiley

, & Feiner

(2001). Making a scene: Representational authority and a community-centered process of script development. In Haedicke

S. C.

& Nellahus

(Eds.), Performing democracy: International perspectives on urban community-based performance (pp. 121–142). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

52.

Willett

, Burn

, & Parker

(2005).New media, production practices, learning spaces. Education, Communication, and Information, 5(1), 1–3.

53.

Worthman

(2002). “Just playing the part”: Engaging adolescents in drama and literacy. New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.