This study investigates the teacher's role in the student advisory process, which to date has generated limited research literature. Teachers who serve as student advisors assume a role that extends beyond the more traditional instructional role, and includes implied or explicit expectations to provide student advisees with academic and nonacademic support. Part of this nonacademic support role involves providing social and emotional support to students. This study particularly focuses on the advisor role and advisory programs in small high schools, which places a premium on strong student-teacher relationships, rendering advisory programs a central structure. Organizational theory that distinguishes role complexity from organizational complexity further frames the study, which explores the complex teacher-advisor role in an organizational setting that has intentionally decreased the number of differentiated professional roles.
Research Question
How do teachers in small high schools enact their advisor roles, specifically their roles relative to the social and emotional support of students?
Participants
Teachers assigned the role of advisor in three small public high schools.
Research Design
This is a qualitative study with a theoretical framework based on Giddens’ structuration theory.
Conclusions
Advisors were found to possess identifiable characteristics that impacted how they enacted their roles, and ultimately, provided support and guidance to their students. These characteristics concerned advisors’ background knowledge, relevant experience, skills and guiding principles about advising. Teacher education, either in preservice or professional development settings, contributed minimally to the personal resources and schemas, or guiding principles, that teachers used as they enacted the advisor role. Advisors with lower levels of personal resources, and less developed role schemas, tended to struggle more with the role, while advisors bringing more of these assets to their work experienced greater comfort and effectiveness with it. Implications are discussed for the small schools movement, teachers’ potential to provide social and emotional support to their students, and role complexity within organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenD., NicholsP., TocciC., HochmanD., & GrossK. (2006). Supporting students’ success through distributed counseling. New York, NY: Institute for Human Achievement.
2.
AyersW. (2000). Simple justice: Thinking about teaching and learning, equity, and the fight for small schools. In William AyersM. K. & LyonGabrielle H. (Eds.), A simple justice: The challenge of small schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
3.
BakerW. E., & FaulknerR.R. (1991).Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry.American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279–309.
4.
BalletK., & KelchtermansG. (2007).Workload and willingness to change: Disentangling the experience of intensification.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 47-67.
5.
BartlettL. (2004). Expanding teacher roles: A resource for retention or a recipe for overwork?Journal of Education Policy, 19(5), 565–582.
6.
BehreW. J., AstorR.A., & MeyerH. (2001).Elementary- and middle-school teachers’ reasoning about intervening in school violence: An examination of violence-prone school subcontexts.Journal of Moral Education, 30(2), 131–153.
7.
BidwellC. E. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972–1022). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
8.
BidwellC. E., FrankK.A., & QuirozP.A. (1997).Teacher types, workplace controls and the organization of schools.Sociology of Education, 70(4), 285-307.
9.
BorkoH. (2004).Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain.Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
10.
BowenN. K., & BowenG.L. (1999).Effects of crime and violence in neighborhoods and schools on the school behavior and performance of adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(3), 319-342.
11.
BransfordJ., Darling-HammondL., & LePageP. (2005). Introduction. In Darling-HammondL. & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
ByrneB. M. (1994).Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers.American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 645–673.
14.
CalleroP. L. (1994).From role-playing to role-using: Understanding role as resource.Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 228–243.
15.
Center for Mental Health in Schools. (2006). Current status of mental health in schools: A policy and practice analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Mental Health in Schools.
16.
CohenD. K., RaudenbushS.W., & BallD.L. (2003).Resources, instruction and research.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 1-24.
17.
CoserR. (1975). The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. In CoserL. (Ed.), The idea of social structure. New York, NY: Harcourt.
18.
CottonK. (2001). New small learning communities: Findings from recent literature. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.
19.
CroningerR. G., & LeeV.E. (2001).Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance.Teachers College Record, 103(4), 548–581.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
DavisH. A. (2003).Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development.Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.
23.
EvansG. W. (2004).The environment of childhood poverty.American Psychologist, 59(2), 77-92.
24.
FarmerG. L. (2008). Willingness to seek help: The role of social inclusion and capital. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Social Work and Research. Washington, DC., January 2008.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
29.
GoddardR. D., HoyW.K., & HoyA.W. (2000).Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and effect on student achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
30.
GrantG. (1988). The world we created at Hamilton High. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
HamreB. K., & PiantaR.C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76(5), 949-967.
32.
IngersollR. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
JacksonP. W. (1990). Life in classrooms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
34.
JohnsonR. B. (1997).Examining the validity structure of qualitative research.Education, 118(2), 282-292.
35.
KafkaJ. (2006). Thinking big about getting small: A genealogy of small school reform: Prepared for 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
36.
KollerJ. R., & BertelJ.M. (2006).Responding to today's mental health needs of children, families and schools: Revisiting the preserve training and preparation of school-based personnel.Education and Treatment of Children, 29(2), 197–217.
37.
LawrenceB. K., AbramsonP., BergsagelV., BinglerS., DiamondB., GreeneT. J., WashorE. (2006). Dollars and sense II: Lessons from good, cost-effective small schools. Cincinnati, OH: KnowledgeWorks Foundation.
38.
LipmanP. (1997).Restructuring in context: A case study of teacher participation and the dynamics of ideology, race, and power.American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 3–37.
39.
LittleJ. W. (1990).The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations.Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
40.
LortieD. C. (2002). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
MeierD. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
42.
National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. (2005). Foster care: Numbers and trends. In Department of Health and Human Services (Ed.).
43.
National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine (Ed.). (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn.Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
44.
NewmannF. (1981).Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications of theory.Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 546–564.
45.
NoddingsN. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46.
RaywidM. A., & OshiyamaL. (2000). Musings in the wake of Columbine: What can schools do?Phi Delta Kappan, 81(6), 444–449.
47.
RioloS. A., NguyenT.A., GredenJ. F., & KingC. A. (2005).Prevalence of depression by race/ethnicity: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 998–1000.
48.
RoeserR. W., & MidgleyC. (1997).Teachers’ views of issues involving students’ mental health.The Elementary School Journal, 98(2), 115–133.
49.
RosenfeldL. B., RichmanJ.M., BowenG. L., & WynnsS. L. (2006).In the face of a dangerous community: The effects of social support and neighborhood danger on high school students’ school outcomes.Southern Communication Journal, 71(3), 273–289.
50.
RyanA. M., GheenM.H., & MidgleyC. (1998).Why do some students avoid Asking for Help?: An Examination of the Interplay Among Students’ Academic Efficacy, Teachers’ Social–Emotional Role, and the Classroom Goal Structure.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 528-535.
51.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change.”New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
ScottW. R., & DavidsG.F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
53.
SewellW. (1992).A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation.American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
54.
SewellW. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
TaylorS. J., & BogdanR. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods (Third ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
56.
TurnerR. H. (1985). Unanswered questions in the convergence between structuralist and interactionist role theories. In HelleH. T. & EisenstadtS. N. (Eds.), Micro-sociological theory: Perspectives on sociological theory (Vol. 2, pp. 22–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
58.
ValliL., & BueseD. (2007).The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability.American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.
59.
WareH., & KintsantasA. (2007).Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment.Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310.
60.
WeissR. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art of qualitative interview studies.New York, NY: The Free Press.
61.
WinshipC., & MandelM. (1983). Roles and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. In LeinhardtS. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1983–1984 (pp. 314–344). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
