The educational performance of Latina/o students in the United States is becoming a central concern in education policy and reform. In an attempt to explain variation in the academic achievement of Latina/o students, considerable sociological and economic research has emerged. Even though the contributions of these studies are of great benefit, there remain important knowledge gaps.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
The purpose of this study is to offer an alternative explanation for the variation in Latina/o students’ academic and nonaca-demic outcomes by using an integrated theoretical framework—funds of knowledge— that takes into consideration the many resources, skills, and knowledge inherent in Latino households.
Research Design
This study uses quantitative methods to examine the relationship between funds of knowledge and Latina/o students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes. A random sample of 212 Latina/o students enrolled in grades K through 12 was selected to examine the association between funds of knowledge and Latina/o students’ academic outcomes—reading and academic achievement, and nonacademic outcomes—literacy practices. The data for this study were drawn from the survey responses to the Latino/Hispanic Household Survey and from student achievement data.
Findings/Results
Results obtained from the factor analysis suggest the emergence of six theoretically relevant factors: social reciprocity, household frequent activities, parental educational philosophy, parental language acquisition, English literacy-oriented activities, and Spanish literacy-oriented activities. Multiple regression analyses indicated the existence of a significant association between some components of funds of knowledge and students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study's findings suggest that Latina/o students and families do engage in many different activities that contribute to students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes. So, instead of viewing Latino families as needing remediation services and lacking resources to support students’ learning, it is critical to build on their life experiences, knowledge, and skills. It is also clear that there is need to refine the approaches and methodologies used to explain and understand the academic and nonacademic outcomes of Latina/o students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsJ., & YeeC. W. (2006).Children's “funds of knowledge” and their real life activities: Two minority ethnic children learning in out-of-school contexts in the UK.Educational Review, 58, 435–449.
2.
AresN., & BuendíaE. (2007).Opportunities lost: Local translations of advocacy policy conversations.Teachers College Record, 109(3), 561–589.
3.
AugustD., & ShanahanT. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BeanF., & TiendaM. (1987). The Hispanic population of the United States. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BattleJ. (2002).Longitudinal analysis of academic achievement among a nationwide sample of Hispanic students in one- versus dual-parent households.Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 430–477.
6.
BeckerG. (1964). Human capital. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
BoseC. (2006). City variation in the socioeconomic status of Latinos in New York State: A 2006 policy brief for the New York State Assembly Puerto Rican/Hispanic Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.assembly.state.ny.us/comm/PRHisp/20070110/
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
9.
BourdieuP., & PasseronJ. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
BraverS., & BayC. (1992).Assessing and compensating for self-selection bias (non-representativeness) of the family research sample.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(4), 925–939.
11.
CaldasS., & BankstonC.III (1997).Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement.Journal of Educational Research, 90, 269–278.
12.
CarterP. (2003).“Black” cultural capital, status positioning, and schooling conflicts for low-income African American youth.Social Problems, 50, 136-155.
13.
ChardD., & DicksonS. (1999).Phonological awareness.Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(5), 261–270.
14.
ChengS., & StarksB. (2002).Racial differences in the effects of significant others on students’ educational expectations.Sociology of Education, 75, 306–27.
15.
ColemanJ., CampbellE., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodA., YorkR., & WeinfeldR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
ColemanJ. (1988).Social capital in the creation of human capital.The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
17.
ColesG. (2003). Reading the naked truth: Literacy, legislation, and lies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18.
CumminsJ. (1986).Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention.Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18–36.
19.
Deil-AmenR., & López TurleyR. (2007).A review of the transition to college literature in sociology.Teachers College Record, 109(10), 6–7.
20.
DeLeonA. (2002). The urban high school's challenge: Ensuring literacy for every child. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.
21.
DesimoneL. (1999). Linking parental involvement with student achievement: Do race and income matter?Journal of Educational Research, 93, 11–31.
22.
DillonW., MaddenT., & MulaniN. (1983).Scaling models for categorical variables: An application of latent structure models.Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 209–238.
23.
Education Trust (2003). Latino achievement in America. Washington, DC.
24.
Faulstich-OrellanaM., DornerL., & PulidoL. (2003). Accessing assets: Immigrant youth's work as translators or “para-phrasers.” Social Problems, 50(4), 505–524.
25.
FedderkeJ., de KadtR., & LuizJ. (1999).Economic growth and social capital: A critical reflection.Theory and Society, 28, 709–745.
26.
FieldA. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
FreebodyP., LukeA., & GilbertP. (1991).Reading positions and practices in the classroom.Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 435–457.
28.
FryR. (2003). Hispanic youth dropping out of U.S. schools: Measuring the challenge. Washington, DC: The Pew Hispanic Center.
29.
GándaraP. (1999).Telling stories of success: Cultural capital and the educational mobility of Chicano students.Latino Studies Journal, 10, 38–54.
30.
GarcíaE., & CuéllarD. (2006). Who are these linguistically and culturally diverse students?Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2220–2246.
31.
GlickJ., & WhiteM. (2003).The academic trajectories of immigrant youths: Analysis within and across cohorts.Demography, 40, 759–783.
32.
GonzálezN., MollL., & AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HaertelandE., & HermanJ. (2005).A historical perspective on validity arguments for accountability testing.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 104(2), 1–34.
35.
HaladynaT. (2006).Perils of standardized achievement testing.Educational Horizons, 85(1), 30–43.
36.
HermanJ., & GolanS. (1993).Effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 20–25.
37.
JaegerR. (1993). Statistics: A spectator sport. (2nd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
JiménezR. (2000).Literacy and the identity development of Latina/o students.American Educational Research Journal, 37, 971–1000.
39.
JiménezR., GarcíaG., & PearsonP. (1996).The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles.Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 90–112.
40.
KaltonG., (1983). Introduction to survey sampling. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
KaoG., & TiendaM. (1995).Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth.Social Science Quarterly, 76, 1–19.
42.
KingstonP. (2001).The unfulfilled promise of cultural capital theory.Sociology of Education, 74, 88–99.
43.
KitsonG., SussmanM., WilliamsG., ZeehandelaarR., ShickmanterB., & SteinbergJ. (1982).Sampling issues in family research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 965–981.
44.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. (1995).Toward a critical race theory in education.Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
45.
LareauA. (1999).Family-school relationships: A view from the classroom.Educational Policy, 3, 245–259.
46.
LareauA., & HorvatE. (1999).Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships.Sociology of Education, 72, 37-53.
47.
LareauA., & WeiningerE. (2003).Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment.Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.
48.
LarsonJ. (1997).Challenging autonomous models of literacy: Street's call to action.Linguistics and Education, 8(4), 439–445.
49.
LeeC. (2001).Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students.American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141.
LeeV., & CroningerR. (1994).The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students.American Journal of Education, 102, 286–329.
52.
LlagasC., & SnyderT. D. (2003). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
53.
LutzA. (2006).Spanish maintenance among English-speaking Latino youth: The role of individual and social characteristics.Social Forces, 84(3), 1417–1433.
54.
MarcelliE., & CorneliusW. (2001).The changing profile of Mexican migrants to the United States: New Evidence from California and Mexico.Latin American Research Review, 36(3), 105-131.
55.
MarshallP. (2002). Cultural diversity in our schools. Toronto, Canada: Wadsworth Group.
56.
McDonoughP. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
57.
McNealL., & ValenzuelaA. (2000). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. ERIC Document.
58.
MercadoC. (2005). Reflections on the study of households in New York City and Long Island: A different route, a common destination. In GonzálezN., MollL., & AmantiC. (Eds.), Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 233–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
MollL., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzálezN. (1992).Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms.Theory into Practice, 31, 132–141.
61.
MollL., DiazS., EstradaE., & LopesL. (1992). Making contexts: The social construction of lessons in two languages. In Saravia-ShoreM. & ArvizuS. F. (Eds.), Cross-cultural literacy: Ethnographies of communication in multiethnic classrooms (pp. 339–363). New York, NY: Garland.
62.
MollL., & GonzálezN. (1994).Lessons from research with language minority children.Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 439–456.
63.
MollL., & GreenbergJ. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In MollL. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MollL., & RuizR. (2002). The schooling of Latino children. In Suárez-OrozcoM. M. & PáezM. M. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 362–374). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
65.
MorenoR. (2002).Teaching the alphabet: An exploratory look at maternal instruction in Mexican American families.Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24(2), 191-205.
66.
MorrisonK., & LuiI. (2000).Ideology, linguistic capital, and the medium of instruction in Hong Kong.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21, 471-486.
67.
MurphyK., & DavidshoferC. (2001). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
68.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). The Condition of Education 2004 (NCES 2004–077). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
69.
OgbuJ. (1987).Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 312–334.
70.
OgbuJ. (1991). Immigrant and involuntary minorities in comparative perspective. In GibsonM. & OgbuJ. (Eds.), Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: New Press.
71.
OlmedoP. (1997).Voices of our past: Using oral history to explore funds of knowledge within a Puerto Rican family.Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 28, 550–573.
72.
OrellanaM., & ReynoldsJ. (2008).Cultural modeling: Leveraging bilingual skills for school paraphrasing tasks.Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 48–65
73.
OrfieldG. (1986).Hispanic education: Challenges, research and policies.American Journal of Education, 95, 1–25.
74.
PadillaY. (1996).The influence of family background on the educational attainment of Latinos.New England Journal of Public Policy, 2, 25–48.
75.
ParcelT., & DufurM. (2001).Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement.Social Forces, 79, 881–911.
76.
Pew Hispanic Center (2005). Hispanics: A people in motion. Washington, DC.
77.
PodsakoffP., MacKenzieS., LeeJ., & PodsakoffN. (2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
78.
PongS. (1997). Sibship size and educational attainment in peninsular Malaysia: Do policies matter?Sociological Perspectives, 40(2), 227–42.
79.
PortesA. (1998).Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology.Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
80.
PortesA. (2000).The two meanings of social capital.Sociological Forum, 15, 1–12.
81.
PortesA., & McLeodD. (1996).Educational progress of children of immigrants: The roles of class, ethnicity, and school context.Sociology of Education, 69, 255–275.
82.
PortesA., & RumbautR. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
83.
PortesP., & ZadyM. (2001, April). Determinants of reading achievement of immigrant adolescents: The role of demographic and psycho-cultural factors in school adaptation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting. Seattle, WA.
84.
PortesA., & ZhouM. (1993).The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74-96.
85.
ReayD. (1998).'It's all becoming a habitus': Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 431-444.
86.
ReeseL., GallimoreR., & GoldenbergG. (1999). Job-required literacy, home literacy environments, and school reading: Early literacy experiences of immigrant Latino children. In LipsonJ. G. & McSpaddenL. A. (Eds.), Negotiating power and place at the margins: Selected papers on refugees and immigrants, Vol. VII, (pp. 232–269). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
87.
ReeseL., GarnierH., GallimoreR., & GoldenbergC. (2000).A longitudinal analysis of the ecocultural antecedents of emergent Spanish literacy and subsequent English reading achievement of Spanish-speaking students.American Educational Research Journal, 37, 633–662.
88.
RodriguezJ. L. (2002).Family environment and achievement among three generations of Mexican American high school students.Applied Developmental Science, 6, 88–94.
89.
Rubinstein-AvilaE. (2006).Connecting with Latino learners.Educational Leadership, 63, 38–43.
90.
RumbergerR. (1995).Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools.American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583–625.
91.
RumbergerR., & LarsonK. (1998).Toward explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican American language-minority students.Sociology of Education, 71, 69–93.
92.
SarachoO. (1997).Perspectives on family literacy.Early Child Development and Care, 127, 3–11.
93.
SchmidC. (2001).Educational achievement, language minority students, and the new second generation.Sociology of Education, 74, 71–87.
94.
SchultzT. (1961).Investment in human capital.American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.
95.
SirinS., (2005).Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research.Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
96.
SnowW., BarnesJ., GoodmanI., & HemphillL. (1991). Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97.
SnowC., BurnsS., & GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
98.
StampsK., & BohonS. (2006).Educational attainment in new and established Latino metropolitan destinations.Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1225–1240.
99.
StevensJ. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
100.
StreetB. (1987, October). Comparative perspectives on literacy research. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
101.
StreetB. (1997).The implications of the “New Literacy Studies” for literacy education.English in Education, 31, 45–59.
102.
StreetC. (2005).Funds of knowledge at work in the writing classroom.Multicultural Education, 13, 22–25.
103.
StricklandD., & TaylorD. (1989). Family storybook reading: Implications for children, families, and curriculum. In StricklandD. S. & MorrowL. M. (Eds.), Emerging literacy: Young children learn to read and write (pp. 27–34). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
104.
Suárez-OrozcoM., & PaezM. (2002). Latinos: Remaking America. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
105.
SuskindD. (2007).Going public: NCLB and literacy practices in teacher education.Language Arts, 84(5), 450–455.
106.
TorresL. (1997). Puerto Rican discourse: A sociolinguistic study of a New York suburb.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
107.
TruebaH. (1988).Culturally based explanations of minority students’ academic achievement.Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 19, 270–287.
108.
TruebaH. (2002).Multiple ethnic, racial, and cultural identities in action: From marginality to new cultural capital in modern society.Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 7–28.
109.
UpadhyayB. (2006).Using students’ lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking.Science Education, 90, 94–110.
ValenciaR. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. The Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. London, UK: Falmer Press.
112.
ValenciaR., & VillarrealB. (2003).Improving students’ performance via standards-base school reform: A critique.The Reading Teacher, 56(7), 612–621.
113.
Vélez-IbañezC., & GreenbergJ. (1992).Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S.-Mexican households.Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23, 313–335.
114.
VigdorJ. (2004).Community composition and collective action: Analyzing initial mail response to the 2000 Census.Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 303–312.
115.
VolkD., & De AcostaM. (2004).Mediating networks for literacy learning: The role of Puerto Rican siblings. In GregoryE., LongS., and VolkD. (Eds.). Many pathways to literacy: Young children learning with siblings, grandparents, peers, and communities (pp. 25–39). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
116.
WeisskirchR. & Alatorre AlvaS. (2005).Language brokering and the acculturation of Latino children.Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 369–378.
117.
WinshipC., & MareR. (1992).Models for sample selection bias.Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 327-50
118.
WojtkiewiczR., & DonatoK. (1995).Hispanic educational attainment: The effects of family background and nativity.Social Forces, 74(2), 559–574.
119.
WolfE. (1984). Culture: panacea or problem?American Antiquity, 49(2), 393–400.
120.
ZentellaA. (1997).Youth at home, in their communities, and in school: The language link.Education and Urban Society, 30, 122–130.
121.
ZhouM. (1997).Growing up American: The challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants.Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 63-95.
