Social Reproduction of Inequality: The Racial Composition of Feeder Schools to the University of California

Abstract

Background/Context

Previous research has pointed to the dismal state of secondary education in California and its implications for college access. These studies identified the extent to which disparities in access and outcomes in California are correlated with school demographics and the relative levels of segregation that exist in California's public high schools.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

Our research advances understandings of this association within California's most selective sector of public higher education: the University of California. Three research questions guided our study: (1) In what ways, if any, are the racial compositions of high schools different for first-time freshmen (FTF) at different UC campuses? (2) How are the racial compositions of high schools that are the source of underrepresented minorities (URMs) at each UC campus different, if at all, from the racial compositions of high schools that are the source of White FTF? (3) Do the racial compositions of public high schools in California have an independent net effect on the likelihood that a school will send graduates to the University of California and individual UC campuses, controlling for other school characteristics?

Research Design

To answer our research questions, this quantitative study used descriptive correlations and multiple regressions to examine the high school source of FTF for 8 out of 9 UC campuses for the 2000–2001 academic year.

Findings/Results

Although the University of California as a whole may appear to be making gains in providing opportunities for students of color, accessibility to individual UC campuses for Black and Latino students varied depending on URM or White high school attendance. At 5 of the 8 campuses in this study, a greater proportion of URM FTF originated from White schools, as opposed to URM schools, where they were most concentrated.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Educational policies and practices in the UC system that hold some campuses accountable for goals of equity yet allow other campuses to exclude whole groups of students based primarily on the high school they attended are neither effective nor equitable. Researchers, policy makers, and educational leaders should examine the ways in which admissions policies may inherently privilege one group (those from White schools) and disadvantage other groups (those from URM schools). This problem needs to be addressed by both policy makers and practitioners in higher education and the K–12 system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

W. R.

, Bonous-Hammarth

, & Teranishi

(2002). Stony the road we trod: The Black struggle for higher education in California. Los Angeles: CHOICES, UCLA.

Brown

, Edley

, Gandara

, Hayashi

, Kidder

, Ledesma

. (2006). California at the crossroads: Confronting the looming threat to achievement, access, and equity at the University of California and beyond (Discussion Paper). Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Race, Ethnicity, and Diversity, University of California Berkeley School of Law.

Chang

M. J.

(2000). The relationship of high school characteristics to the selection of undergraduate students for admission to the University of California-Berkeley. Journal of Negro Education, 69 (1/2), 49–59.

Clark

W. A.

(1998). The California cauldron. New York: Guilford Press.

Education Trust-West. (2004). Are California high schools ready for the 21st century? Oakland, CA: Author.

Frost

M. B.

(2007) Texas students’ college expectations: Does high school racial composition matter? Sociology of Education, 80, 43–66.

Harris

(2004). Report on the status of public school education in California: With special emphasis on the status of equality in public school education. Menlo Park, CA: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Hunt

(2005). Racing with race: Strategies for competitive college access for African Americans 2005 CAPAA findings. Los Angeles: Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies.

Hurtado

, Milem

, Clayton-Pedersen

A. R.

, & Allen

W. R.

(1999). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education. Washington, DC: Graduate School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University.

10.

Kane

T. J.

(1998). Racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions. In Phillips

(Ed.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 431–456). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

11.

Martin

, Karabel

, & Jaquez

S. W.

(2005). High school segregation and access to the University of California. Educational Policy, 19, 308–330.

12.

Massey

D. S.

, & Denton

N. A.

(1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

McDonough

P. M.

(1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

14.

Mickelson

R. A.

, & Heath

(1999). The effects of school and classroom racial composition on educational outcomes. Journal of Negro Education, 68, 566–586.

15.

Oakes

, Rogers

, Silver

, & Goode

(2004). Separate and unequal 50 years after Brown: California's racial “opportunity gap.” Los Angeles: UCLA/IDEA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.

16.

Orfield

(1993). The growth of segregation in American schools: Changing patterns of separation and poverty since 1968. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on School Desegregation to the National School Boards Association.

17.

Orfield

, & Lee

(2006). Racial transformation and the changing nature of segregation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

18.

Orfield

, & Yun

J. T.

(1999). Resegregation in American Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

19.

Portes

, & Rumbaut

(1996). Immigrant American: A portrait (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

20.

Teranishi

(2003). California higher education: Is the whole better than its parts? Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Alliance for International Higher Education Policy (AIHEPS), Puebla, Mexico.

21.

Teranishi

(2006). Black residential migration in California: Implications for higher education policy. Sacramento: Research and Policy Institute of California.

22.

Teranishi

, Allen

W. R.

, & Solorzano

D. G.

(2004). Opportunity at the crossroads: Racial inequality, school segregation, and higher education in California. Teachers College Record, 106, 2224–2247.

23.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.