Goals,Grades,Fears,and Peers. Introductory Essay for Special Issues on the Effects of School and Classroom Racial and SES Composition on Educational Outcomes

Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975).

Ancheta A. (2006a). Civil rights, education research, and the courts. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 26–29.

Ancheta A. (2006b). Scientific evidence and equal protection of the law. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Boger J. C. (2002). A quick look at the remedial responsibilities under the federal constitution for school districts found to have practiced de jure, or intentional segregation of their public schools— and at judicial consideration of the relation between continuing school segregation and private housing choices in formerly segregated school districts. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Law School.

Borman K. , Eitle T. , Michael D. , Eitle D. J. , Lee R. , Johnson L. , . (2004). Accountability in a postdesegregation era: The continuing significance of racial segregation in Florida's schools. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 605–645.

Brown v. Board of Educ. I, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Chambers J. (2004, August). The legacy of Brown. Remarks of Julius Chambers, Esq. to the American Sociological Association, New York, New York.

Chesler M. A. , Sanders J. , & Kalmuss D. S. (1988). Social science in court: Mobilizing experts in the school desegregation cases. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Cook T. (Ed.). (1984). School desegregation and Black achievement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

Crain R. (1984). Is nineteen really better than ninety-three? In Cook T. (Ed.), School desegregation and Black achievement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

Crain R. , & Mahard R. (1983). The effect of research methodology on desegregation-achievement studies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 839–854.

Garfinkel H. (1959). Social science evidence and the school desegregation cases. Journal of Politics, 21, 37–59.

Grigg W. , Donahue P. , & Dion G. (2007). The Nation's Report Card: 12th-Grade Reading and Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2007–468). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Grigg W. , Lauko M. , & Brockway D. (2006). The Nation's Report Card: Science 2005 (NCES 2006-466). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 401 U.S. 424, 91 S. Ct. 849, 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971).

Kahlenberg R. (2001). All together now: Creating middle-class schools through public school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Kluger R. (1975). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's struggle for equality. New York: Random House.

Logan J. (2004). Resegregation in American public schools? Not in the 1990s. Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research, University at Albany. Retrieved from http://www.s4.brown.edu/cen2000/noresegregation/noresegregation_report.pdf

Lucas S. R. , & Paret M. (2005). Law, race, and education in the United States. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 203–231.

Mickelson R. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215–252.

Mickelson R. A. (2008). Twenty-first century social science on school racial diversity and educational outcomes. Ohio State Law Journal, 69, 1173–1227.

Mickelson R. A. , & Bottia M. (2010). Integrated education and mathematics outcomes: A synthesis of social science research. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 995–1089.

Orfield G. (2009). Reviving the Goal of an Integrated Society: A 21st Century Challenge. Retrieved from http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/deseg/reviving_the_goal_mlk_2009.pdf.

Orfield G. , & Frankenberg E. (2008). The last have become first: Rural and small town America lead the way on desegregation. The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/deseg/lasthavebecomefirst.pdf.

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 127 S. Ct. 2738 (2007).

Perie M. , Grigg W. , & Dion G. (2005). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2006–453). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Roesch R. , Golding S. L. , Hans V. P. , & Reppucci N. D. (1991). Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 1–11.

Rustad M. , & Koenig T. (1993). The Supreme Court and junk social science: Selective distortions in amicus briefs. North Carolina Law Review, 72, 91–162.

Ryan J. (2003). The limited influence of social science evidence in modern desegregation cases. North Carolina Law Review, 81, 1659.

Schofield J. , & Hausmann L. R. M. (2004). School desegregation and social science research. American Psychologist, 59, 538–546.

Swann v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971).

St. John N. (1975). School Desegregation: Outcomes for Children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Taylor W. L. (1997). Introduction and overview: The role of social science in school desegregation efforts. Journal of Negro Education, 66, 196–202.

Vigdor J. L. , & Ludwig J. (2008). Segregation and the test score gap. In Magnuson K. & Waldfogel J. (Eds.), Steady gains and stalled progress (pp. 181–211). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Yonezawa S. , Wells A. S. , & Serna I. (2002). Choosing tracks: “Freedom of choice” in detracting schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 37–67.