For many years, educators, parents, and social scientists have conceptualized engaged parents as those who help their children with their homework, frequently attend school functions, and maintain household rules that dictate when their young engage in schoolwork and leisure. Recent meta-analyses on parental involvement confirm the salience of more subtle social variables, which Bandura and Walters asserted may be even more important than overt parental behavior in fostering positive student outcomes. These results indicate that factors such as parental expectations, the quality of parent–child communication, and parental style may be more highly related to student achievement than various more overt expressions of this involvement.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
The purpose of the article is to examine what the body of research literature indicates about the role and utility of the subtle aspects of parental involvement. The article first establishes a theoretical framework, using Bandura and Walter's research. Then the article focuses on three issues regarding parental involvement: (1) the salience of subtle aspects of parental involvement; (2) subtle actions are also important to help schools more completely involve parents; and (3) to what extent is it possible to educate parents to become more involved? The article also addresses whether those aspects of parental involvement that are the most efficacious in everyday living are also the most vital in school-based parental involvement programs.
Research Design
The article is an analytical essay that summarizes the recent research on the influence of subtle aspects of parental involvement. It reaches conclusions based on investigations into family and school practices.
Conclusion
There are deliberate actions that teachers can take to enhance parental involvement. First, educate parents to comprehend, and then act on, the fact that it is probably some of the more subtle aspects of parental involvement, such as high expectations and communication, that are among the most important. Second, educate school leaders, teachers, and staff to understand that raising parental participation may be more a function of subtle but important demonstrations of love and respect than a matter of instructing parents to apply particular methods of helping children. Naturally, all these factors are important, but the spirit and the attitude of parental involvement may actually be more important than the pedagogy applied at home. As parents, educators, and other leaders apply these principles, it is likely that parental involvement in the early 21st century will be greater than it has been in recent memory. Ultimately, teachers, students, and parents will all benefit from this development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfifiT. D., & OlsonL. (2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72, 192–196.
2.
BaileyD. B.Jr. (2001). Evaluating parental involvement and family support in early intervention and preschool programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 7–14.
3.
BakerA. (2001). Improving parent involvement programs and practice: Parent perceptions. In ReddingS. & ThomasL. G. (Eds.), The community of the school (pp. 127–154). Lincoln, IL: Academic Development Institute.
4.
BanduraA., & WaltersR. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
5.
BarberN. (2004). Kindness in a cruel world: The evolution of altruism. New York: Prometheus Books.
6.
BatsonC. D., ArmadN., & StocksE. L. (2004). Benefits and liabilities of empathy-induced altruism. In MillerA. G. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 359–385). New York: Guilford Press.
7.
BauchP., & GoldringE. B. (1995). Parental involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 17(1), 1–21.
8.
BaumrindD. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.
9.
BerscheidE. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129.
10.
BlusteinJ. (1991). Care and commitment: Taking the personal point of view. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BoI. (1995). The sociocultural environment as a source of growth among 15- to 16-year-old boys. Children's Environment, 12, 469–478.
12.
BoehnkeK., ScottW. A., & ScottR. (1996). Family climate as a determinant of academic performance. East Asian and Euro-American cultures compared. In PandeyJ. & SinhaD. (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 119–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
BorruelT. W. (2002). The ten p's of parent communication. A strategy for staff development. Child Care Information Exchange, 143, 54–57.
14.
BradenJ. P. (1999). School psychology for high risk populations: Gleanings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 457–463.
15.
BrooksR., & GoldsteinS. (2001). Raising resilient children: Fostering strength, hope, and optimism in your child. Lincolnwood, IL: Contemporary Books.
16.
CasanovaP., Garcia-LinaresC., de la TorreM., & CarpioM. (2005). Influence of family and socio-demographic variables on students with low academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 25, 423–435.
17.
ChambersL. (1998). How customer friendly is your school?Educational Leadership, 56(2), 33–35.
18.
DavalosD. B., ChavezE. L., & GuardiolaR. J. (2005). Effects of perceived parental school support and family communication on delinquent behaviors in Latinos and white non-Latinos. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11(1), 57–68.
19.
Davis-KeanP. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parent expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304.
20.
Delgado-GaitanC. (2004). Involving Latino families in schools: Raising student achievement through home-school partnerships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
DominaT. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78, 233–249.
22.
EnglundM. M., LucknerA. E., WhaleyG. J., & EgelandB. (2004). Children's achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 723–730.
23.
EpsteinJ. L. (1994). Theory to practice: School and family partnerships lead to school improvement and school success. In FagnangoC. L. & WerberB. Z. (Eds.), School, family, and community interaction: A view from the firing lines (pp. 39–54). San Francisco: Westview.
24.
EpsteinJ. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
GarbersC., TunstillJ., AllnockD., & AkhurstS. (2006). Facilitating access to services for children and families: Lessons for Sure Start local programmes. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 287–296.
26.
GillS., & ReynoldsA. J. (1999). Educational expectations and school achievement of urban African American children. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 403–424.
27.
Graham-ClayS. (2005). Communication with parents: Struggling for teachers. School Community Journal, 15, 117–129.
28.
GreenC. L., WalkerJ. M. T., & Hoover-DempseyK. V. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children's education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544.
29.
HendersonA. T., & MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
30.
Henning-StoutM., & GoodeL. A. (1986). Parent involvement in a low-income neighborhood primary school. Special Services in the Schools, 2(4), 63–76.
31.
HinerN. R., & HawesJ. M. (1985). Growing up in America: Children in historical perspective. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32.
HoE. S. (2003). Students’ self-esteem in an Asian educational system: Contribution of parental involvement and parental investment. School Community Journal, 13, 65–84.
33.
Hoover-DempseyK. V. (2005, April). Research and evaluation of family involvement in education: What lies ahead? Symposium sponsored by Harvard University at the annual conference of the American Educational research Association in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
34.
Hoover-DempseyK., & SandlerH. (1995). Parental involvement in children's education: Why does it make a difference?Teachers College Record, 97, 310–331.
35.
Hoover-DempseyK., & SandlerH. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education?Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.
36.
Hoover-DempseyK. V., WalkerJ. M., & JonesK. P. (2002). Teachers involving parents (TIP): Results from an in-service teacher education program for enhancing parental involvement. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18, 843–867.
37.
JeynesW. (2002). Divorce, family structure, and the academic success of children. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
38.
JeynesW. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children's academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202–218.
39.
JeynesW. (2005a). A meta-analysis: Parental involvement and secondary student educational outcomes. Evaluation Exchange of the Harvard Family Research Project, 10(4), 6.
40.
JeynesW. (2005b). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.
41.
JeynesW. (2005c). Effects of parental involvement and family structure on the academic achievement of adolescents. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 99–117.
42.
JeynesW. (2005d). Parental involvement in East Asian schools. In Hiatt-MichaelD. (Ed.), International perspectives on parental involvement (pp. 153–179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
43.
JeynesW. (2005e). The effects of parental involvement on the academic achievement of African American youth. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 260–274.
44.
JeynesW. (2006). Standardized tests and the true meaning of kindergarten and preschool. Teachers College Record, 108, 1937–1959.
45.
JeynesW. (2007a). American educational history: School, society, and the common good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
JeynesW. (2007b). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110.
47.
JeynesW. (2008a). Effects of parental involvement on experiences of discrimination and bullying. Marriage & Family Review, 43, 255–268.
48.
JeynesW. (2008b). What we should and should not learn from the Japanese and other East Asian education systems. Educational Policy, 22, 900–927.
49.
JeynesW. (in press). Parental involvement and academic success. New York: Routledge.
50.
JonesB. A. (2000). Educational leadership: Policy dimensions in the 21st century. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
51.
JonesJ. E., WynneL. C., & Al-KhayyalM. (1984). Predicting current school competence of high-risk children with a composite-situational measure of parental communication. In WattN. F. & JamesA. E. (Eds.), Children at risk for schizophrenia: A longitudinal perspective (pp. 393–413). New York: Cambridge University.
52.
KaplanD. S., LiuX., & KaplanH. (2001). Influence of parents’ self-feelings and expectations on children's academic performance. Journal of Education Research, 94, 360–370.
53.
KeithP. B., & LichtmanM. V. (1994). Does parental involvement influence the academic achievement of Mexican-American eighth graders? Results from the National Education Longitudinal Study. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 256–273.
54.
KellyS. (2004). Do increased levels of parental involvement account for social class differences in track placement?Social Science Research, 33, 626–659.
55.
KennedyR. (2001). The encouraging parent. New York: Three Rivers Press.
56.
KyleD. W., McIntyreE., MillerK. B., & MooreG. H. (2005). Family connections: A basis for teacher reflectional and instructional improvement. School Community Journal, 15, 29–50.
57.
LambM. (1997). The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley.
58.
LancasterD. R. (2004). The psychology of parental control: How well-meaning parenting backfires. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 69–70.
59.
LareauA. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York: Falmer.
60.
LindleJ. C. (1990). Five reasons to prepare your staff for parental involvement. School Administrator, 47(6), 19–22, 24.
61.
LopezG., ScribnerJ. D., & MahitivanichchaK. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 253–288.
62.
LoveF. E. (1996). Communicating with parents: What beginning teachers can do. College Student Journal, 30, 440–444.
63.
MappK. L., JohnsonV. R., StricklandC. S., & MezaC. (2010). High school family centers: Transformative spaces linking schools and families in support of student learning. In JeynesW. (Ed.), Family factors and the educational success of children (pp. 336–366). New York: Routledge.
64.
MattinglyD. J., PrislinR., McKenzieT. L., RodriguezJ. L., & KayzarB. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parental involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549–576.
65.
McAdooJ. L. (1979). Father-child interaction patterns and self-esteem in Black preschool children. Young Children, 34(2), 46–53.
66.
McLanahanS., & SandefurG. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
NimnichtG. (1981). Back to the basics: More loving, tender care for young children. Young Children, 36(6), 4–11.
68.
OrnishD. (1998). Love and survival: The scientific basis for the healing power of intimacy. New York: HarperCollins.
PeckM. S. (2002). The road less traveled: A new psychology of love, traditional values, and spiritual growth. New York: Simon and Schuster.
71.
PeressiniD. D. (1998). The portrayal of parents in the school mathematics reform literature: Locating the context for parental involvement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 555–582.
72.
PestalozziJ. (1898). How Gertrude teaches her children: An attempt to help mothers to teach their own children and an account of the method (Holland, L. & Turner, F., Trans.). Syracuse, NY: Bardeen.
73.
PestalozziJ. (1916). How a child is led to God through maternal love. In GreenJ. A. (Trans.), Pestalozzi's educational writings. London: Edward Arnold.
74.
PurkeyW. W., & StanleyP. H. (1991). Invitational teaching, learning, and living. Washington DC: National Education Association.
75.
RatelleC. F., LaroseS., & GuayF. (2005). Perceptions of parental involvement and support as predictors of college students’ persistence in a science curriculum. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 286–293.
76.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E., & PiantaR. C. (2005). Family-school communication in preschool and kindergarten in the content of a relationship-enhancing intervention. Early Education Development, 16, 287–316.
77.
RoodW. R. (1968). The art of teaching Christianity: Enabling the loving revolution. Nashville, TN: Abington Press.
78.
RosenthalR., & JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
79.
St. ClairL., & JacksonB. (2006). Effect of family involvement training on the language skills of young families. School Community Journal, 16(1), 31–41.
80.
SheldonS. B. (2005). Testing a structural equation model of partnership program implementation and parental involvement. Elementary School Journal, 106, 171–187.
81.
Slaughter-DefoeD. T. (1991). Parental educational choice: Some African American dilemmas. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 354–360.
82.
SlavinR. E. (2002). Mounting evidence supports the achievement effects of Success for All. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 469–471.
83.
SlavinR., & MaddenN. (2006). Reducing the gap: Success for All and the achievement of African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 75, 389–400.
84.
SteinbergL., LambornS. D., & DarlingN. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65, 754–770.
85.
SternbergR. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. New York: Basic Books.
86.
TarrisT. W., & BokI. A. (1996). Effects of parenting style upon psychological well-being of young adults: Exploring the relations among parental care, locus of control and depression. Early Child Development & Care, 132(1), 93–104.
87.
UlichR. (1968). A history of religious education. New York: New York University Press.
88.
United States Census Bureau. (2004). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
89.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
90.
VasquezO. A. (2004). A participatory perspective on parental involvement. In MoraJ. & DiazD. R. (Eds.), Latino social policy: A participatory research model (pp. 57–87). New York: Haworth Press.
91.
WallersteinJ. S., & BlakesleeS. (1989). Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
92.
WentzelK. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.
93.
YewchukC. R., & SchlosserG. (1995). Characteristics of the parents of eminent Canadian women. Roeper Review, 18, 78–83.
