Rites of Passage: Coercion,Compliance,and Complicity in the Socialization of New Vice-Principals

Abstract

Background/Context

Over four decades ago, Arnold van Gennep used the term rites of passage to describe the ceremonial and ritualistic behaviors that marked the passage between social roles. Although the transition from teaching to administration is not as clearly delineated as passages in traditional societies, it is also characterized by socialization rites, rituals, and ceremonies that communicate information about approved administrative behaviors and reinforce organizational roles and structures.

Focus of Study

This research examined the socialization structures and processes that impacted the transition from teaching to administration. Eight newly appointed vice-principals from an urban Canadian school district were interviewed throughout the school year to determine the people, structures, and events that facilitated or hindered their transition and the challenges they encountered in leading and managing diverse urban schools.

Research Design

Qualitative methodology was used to explore new vice-principals’ experiences. Purposive sampling was used to represent the diversity of voices based on gender, ethnocultural background, type of school, and number of years of experience as a vice-principal. The vice-principals participated in two semistructured interviews during the school year. Individual responses were coded according to the research questions and further analyzed to determine recurring themes and patterns.

Findings/Results

The findings revealed that the novice vice-principals experienced separation, initiation, and incorporation rites that tested them physically, mentally, and emotionally. The pervasive pressure of these socialization tactics forced them to comply with normative expectations of the vice-principalship as a custodial disciplinary role and violated their professional rights.

Conclusion/Recommendations

Coercive socialization practices impact new administrators and their communities negatively and are antithetical to institutional goals of creating equitable schools. School districts, along with regulatory, training, and professional bodies, need to address core issues related to the vice-principalship and the ways in which new school leaders are socialized into administrative roles. Coordinated partnerships and interventions are also needed so that new administrators can develop leadership skills in emotionally and physically safe environments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvy

H. B.

, & Robbins

(1998). If only I knew: Success strategies for navigating the principalship. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Armstrong

(2004a). Personal change and organizational passages: Transitions from teaching to the vice-principalship in a reform climate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Armstrong

(2004b). Constructing moral pathways in the transition from teaching to administration. Values and Ethics in Educational Administration, 3(1), 1–8.

Armstrong

(2005). Leadership at the crossroads: Negotiating challenges, tensions and ambiguities in the transition from teaching to administration. In Armstrong

H. D.

(Ed.), Examining the practice of school administration in Canada (pp. 113–128). Calgary: Alberta, Canada: Detselig Enterprises.

Armstrong

(2009). Administrative passages: Navigating the transition from teaching to administration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.

Armstrong

, & McMahon

(Eds.). (2006). Inclusion in urban educational environments: Addressing issues of diversity, equity, and social justice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Ashforth

B. E.

(2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Begley

(2003). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. In Begley

P. T.

& Johansson

(Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership (pp.1–12). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

Calebrese

(1991). Effective assistant principals: What do they do? NAASP Bulletin, 75(533), 51–57.

10.

Clandinin

D. J.

, & Connelly

F. M.

(2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Cobb

(2005). The Blackwell guide to theology and popular culture. Boston: Blackwell.

12.

Conway

(1990). Organizational rites as culture markers of schools. Urban Education, 25, 195–206.

13.

Crow

(2004). The National College for School Leadership: A North American perspective on opportunities and challenges. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 32, 289–307.

14.

Earl

, Freeman

, Lasky

, Sutherland

, & Torrance

(2002). Policy, politics, pedagogy and people: Early perceptions and challenges of large-scale reform in Ontario schools. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ICEC, University of Toronto.

15.

Fein

M. L.

(1990). Role change: A resocialization perspective. New York: Praeger.

16.

Fishbein

, & Osterman

(2001, April). Crossing over: Learning the ropes and rules of the teacher-administrator relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 463276)

17.

Foster

(2004). The decline of the local: A challenge to educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 176–191.

18.

Gould

R. L.

(1981). Discussion of Schlossberg/Brammer-Abrego papers. Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 44–46.

19.

Greenfield

W. D.

(1985a, April). Being and becoming a principal: Responses to work contexts and socialization processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 254932)

20.

Greenfield

W. D.

(1985b). The moral socialization of school administration: Informal role learning outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 99–119.

21.

Griffith

(2001). Texts, tyranny, and transformation: Educational restructuring in Ontario. In Portelli

& Solomon

(Eds.), The erosion of democracy in education: From critique to possibilities (pp. 83–98). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig.

22.

Hart

A. W.

(1991). Leadership succession and socialization: A synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 61, 451–474.

23.

Hartzell

, Williams

, & Nelson

(1994, February). Addressing the problems of first-year assistant principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 369 179)

24.

Heck

(1995). Organizational and professional socialization: Its impact on the performance of new administrators. Urban Review, 7, 31–49.

25.

Kincheloe

J. L.

(2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Farmer.

26.

Lambert

(2002). Toward a deepened theory of constructivist leadership. In Lambert

, Walker

, Zimmerman

, Cooper

, Lambert

, Gardner

(Eds.), The con-structivist leader (pp. 34–62). New York: Teachers College Press.

27.

Mackinnon

, & Milne

(2007). (Eds.). Education statutes and regulations of Ontario 2008. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: LexisNexis Butterworths.

28.

Marshall

(1992a). The assistant principalship: An overview of the frustrations and rewards. NAASP Bulletin, 76, 88–94.

29.

Marshall

(1992b). The assistant principalship: Leadership choices and challenges. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

30.

Marshall

, & Greenfield

(1987). The dynamics of the enculturation and work of the assistant principal. Urban Education, 22, 36–52.

31.

Marshall

, & Hooley

(2006). The assistant principalship: Leadership choices and challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

32.

Marshall

, & Mitchell

B. A.

(1991). The assumptive worlds of fledgling administrators. Education and Urban Society, 23, 396–415.

33.

Matthews

, & Crow

(2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Boston: Pearson Education.

34.

Merriam

S. B.

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

35.

Nanavati

, & McCulloch

(2003). School culture and the changing role of the secondary vice principal. Research report prepared for the Ontario Principals’ Council, December 2003. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Principals’ Council.

36.

Ryan

(2002). Leadership in contexts of accountability and diversity. In Leithwood

& Hallinger

(Eds.), Second international handbook of leadership and education (pp. 979–1001). London: Kluwer Academic.

37.

Schwandt

T. A.

(2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretism, hermeneutics, and social construction. In Denzin

& Guba

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.189–213). London: Sage.

38.

Sigford

(1998). Who said school administration would be fun? Coping with a new emotional and social reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

39.

Trice

H. M.

, & Morand

D. A.

(1989). Rites of passage in work careers. In Arthur

M. B.

, Hall

D. T.

, & Lawrence

B. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 397–416). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

40.

van Gennep

(1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Williams

T. R.

(August, 2001). Unrecognized exodus, unaccepted accountability: The looming shortage of principals and vice-principals in Ontario public school boards. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Principals Council.

42.

Wollon

, & Sommer

(2003). Saying farewell: Management as a performance art. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/∼cfmlw2/048POB.pdf.