Moral Reasoning of Education Students: The Effects of Direct Instruction in Moral Development Theory and Participation in Moral Dilemma Discussion

Abstract

Background/Context

Results of the few studies that have investigated moral reasoning in education students suggest that such reasoning may be less advanced for them than for college students with non–education majors and that education students do not appear to advance in moral reasoning from freshman to senior year.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to test an educational intervention designed to advance moral reasoning scores of undergraduate elementary and secondary education students.

Setting

The study was conducted in undergraduate classrooms at the University of Nevada, Reno, a Western Land Grant institution.

Participants

Participants were undergraduate elementary (n = 94) and secondary education majors (n = 98) and undergraduate students majoring in English literature and philosophy (n = 42).

Research Design

The study was a quasi-experimental design.

Data Collection and Analysis

Undergraduate education students enrolled in four sections of an introduction to educational psychology course received interventions designed to advance moral reasoning. English and philosophy courses were chosen as control groups. Over a period of 5 weeks, students in the intervention groups were taught moral development theories and participated in online dilemma discussion. An additional 3 weeks were devoted to pretesting and posttesting activities.

Results

A 2 x 5 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA; time by group) with repeated measures on time was conducted to analyze pre- and posttest2 DIT P-scores for all five subgroups. Significant increases in mean DIT P-scores were found for the elementary and secondary intervention groups but not for the control groups. Gains in both the elementary and secondary groups were maintained at posttest2 at the end of the semester, but there were no significant differences from posttest1 to posttest2. To determine the effectiveness of hypothetical versus real-life dilemma discussion on moral reasoning, a 2 x 3 mixed ANOVA (time by group) was conducted. The ANOVA main effect for time and the interaction were significant, whereas the main effect for group was not significant.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Results of the present study support findings of previous studies providing evidence that principled moral reasoning can be advanced by deliberate educational interventions. Future studies should investigate whether gains will be maintained over longer periods of time than a single semester and whether mere gains in moral reasoning scores translate to a broader range of moral behaviors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abebe

, & Davis

(2006–2007). Transcendence in the public schools: The teacher as moral model. Retrieved February 14, 2008, from http://www.collegevalues.org/articles.cfm.

Amidon

, & Hunter

(1966). Improving teaching: The analysis of classroom verbal interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bakken

, & Ellsworth

(1990). Moral development in adulthood: Its relationship to age, sex, and education. Education Research Quarterly, 14(2), 2–9.

Beyer

L. E.

(1991). Schooling, moral commitment, and the preparation of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 205–215.

Beyer

L. E.

(1997). The moral contours of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 245–253.

Boom

, & Molenaar

(1989). A developmental model of hierarchical stage structure in objective moral judgments. Developmental Review, 9(2), 133–145.

Cartwright

C. C.

, & Simpson

T. L.

(2001). The relationship of moral judgment development and teaching effectiveness of student teachers. Education, 111, 139–144.

Chang

F. Y.

(1994). School teachers’ moral reasoning. In Rest

J. R.

& Narvaez

(Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 71–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Clark

C. M.

, & Peterson

P. L.

(1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittrock

M. C.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.

10.

Cooper

(2004). Empathy, interaction and caring: Teachers’ roles in a constrained environment. Pastoral Care in Education, 22(3), 12–21.

11.

Cummings

, Dyas

, Maddux

C D.

, & Kochman

(2001). Principled moral reasoning and behavior of preservice teacher education students. American Education Research Journal, 38, 143–158.

12.

Cummings

, Wiest

L. R.

, Lamitina

, & Maddux

C. D.

(2003). Teacher education curricula and moral reasoning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7, 163–168.

13.

Derryberry

W. P.

, Snyder

, Wilson

, & Barger

(2006). Moral judgment differences in education and liberal arts majors: Cause for concern? Journal of College and Character, 12(4), 2–10.

14.

Ferguson

, McLernon

, & Cairns

(1994). The sociomoral reflection measure— short form: An examination of its reliability and validity in a Northern Irish setting. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 483–489.

15.

Flanders

(1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

16.

Gibbs

J. C.

(1991). Sociomoral developmental delay and cognitive distortion: Implications for the treatment of antisocial youth. In Kurtines

W. M.

& Gewirtz

J. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 95–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Gibbs

J. C.

, Basinger

K. S.

, & Fuller

(1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Goodlad

J. I.

(1990). Places where teachers are taught. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Goodlad

J. I.

(1994). Educational renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

21.

Goodlad

, Soder

, & Sirotnik

K. A.

(Eds.) (1990). The moral dimension of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Grier

, & Firestone

(1998). The effects of an intervention to advance moral reasoning and efficiency. Child Study Journal, 28(4), 267.

23.

Haritos

(2004). Understanding teaching through the minds of teacher candidates: A curious blend of realism and idealism. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 637–654.

24.

Johnston

(1989). Moral reasoning and teachers’ understanding of individualized instruction. Journal of Moral Education, 18, 45–59.

25.

Johnston

, & Lubomudrov

(1987). Teachers’ level of moral reasoning and their understanding of classroom rules and roles. Elementary School Journal, 88, 64–77.

26.

Johnston

, Wetherill

, & Greenebaum

(2002). A comparison of the academic behaviors of elementary and secondary education students. High School Journal, 85(4), 23–39.

27.

Kohlberg

(1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

28.

Kohlberg

(1987). Child psychology and childhood education: A cognitive-developmental view. New York: Longman.

29.

Lampe

J. R.

(1994, April). Teacher education students’ moral development and ethical reasoning processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

30.

Lee

(2005, November). Teachers’ moral development and their perceptions of school environment: Pre-service and in-service teachers in Taiwan's elementary and junior high schools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Moral Education, Cambridge, MA.

31.

Lerkiatbundit

, Utaipan

, Laohawiriyanon

, & Teo

(2006). Randomized controlled study of the impact of the Konstanz method of dilemma discussion on moral judgment. Journal of Allied Health, 35, 101–108.

32.

Liebert

R. M.

(1984). What develops in moral development? In Kurtines

W. M.

& Gewirtz

J. L.

(Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development (pp. 177–192). New York: Wiley.

33.

Lind

(2002). Ist moral lehrbar? Ergebnisse der modernen moralpsychologischen forschung [Can morality be taught? Research findings from modern moral psychology] (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Logos Verlag.

34.

Lubomudrov

(1982). Teachers’ moral development, attitudes toward educational issues, and teaching practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.

35.

MacCallum

J. A.

(1993). Teacher reasoning and moral judgment in the context of student discipline situations. Journal of Moral Education, 22, 3–28.

36.

McNeel

S. P.

(1994). College teaching and student moral development. In Rest

J. R.

& Narvaez

(Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

37.

Narvaez

(2002). Does reading moral stories build character? Educational Psychology Review, 14, 155–171.

38.

Narvaez

, & Rest

(1995). The four components of acting morally. In Kurtines

& Gewirtz

(Eds.), Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.

39.

O'Keefe

, & Johnston

(1989). Perspective-taking and teacher effectiveness: A connecting thread through three developmental literatures. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 20–26.

40.

Piaget

(1997). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.

41.

Rest

(1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

42.

Rest

J. R.

(1994). Background: Theory and research. In Rest

J. R.

& Narvaez

(Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

43.

Rest

J. R.

, & Narvaez

(Eds.). (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

44.

Rest

, & Narvaez

(1998). Guide for DIT-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

45.

Rest

, Narvaez

, Bebeau

M. J.

, & Thoma

S. J.

(1999a). A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 291–324.

46.

Rest

, Narvaez

, Bebeau

M. J.

, & Thoma

S. J.

(1999b). Postconventional moral thinking: a Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

47.

Rest

, Thoma

, & Edwards

(1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 5–28.

48.

Schlaefli

, Rest

, & Thoma

(1985). Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test. Review of Educational Research, 55, 319–352.

49.

Snarey

(1985). The cross-cultural universality of social-moral development. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202–232.

50.

Strike

K. A.

(1990) The legal and moral responsibility of teachers. In Goodland

J. I.

, Soder

& Sirotnik

K. A.

(Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 188–223). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

51.

Strike

, Haller

E. J.

, & Soltis

J. F.

(1998). The ethics of school administration. New York: Teachers College Press.

52.

Thoma

S. J.

(1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6, 165–180.

53.

Thoma

(1994). Moral judgments and moral action. In Rest

J. R.

& Narvaez

(Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 199–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

54.

Walker

(1991). Sex differences in moral reasoning. In Kurtines

& Gewirtz

(Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 333–364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

55.

Wark

G. R.

, & Krebs

D. L.

(2000) The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 5–21.

56.

Yeazell

M. I.

, & Johnson

S. F.

(1988). Levels of moral judgment of faculty and students in a teacher education program: A micro study of an institution. Teacher Education Quarterly, 15(1), 61–70.

57.

Yost

D. S.

(1997). The moral dimensions of teaching and preservice teachers: Can moral dispositions be influenced? Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 281–292.