“To Not be a Traitor of Black English”: Youth Perceptions of Language Rights in an Urban Context

Abstract

Background/Context

Although progress has been made since members of the Conference on College Composition and Communication passed the Students’ Right to Their Own Language resolution (1974), there still remains a demand to examine youth perceptions of language. Such examinations can help teachers and researchers improve curricular choices, honor the lived experiences of students in classrooms, and address a systemic problem within a larger sociopolitical context: the continued failure of American public schooling to adequately educate Black students and other students of color.

Purpose/Objective/Research Questions/Focus of Study

The primary purpose of this article is to detail how youth perceive language rights in their academic and community lives, particularly in relation to what they name “Black English” and “Academic English.” To understand youth language perceptions, this article is guided by the following inquiry: Given the historically dichotomous relationship between Black English and Academic English, how do youth perceive language in their struggle to acquire academic success?

Setting

Data for this ethnographic project, which derive from a larger ongoing multiyear study on youth representations of community and literacy, were collected from two African American teenage males who reside in or near New York City's Harlem community and who graduated from the Harlem High School of New York City and currently attend local colleges in the area.

Research Design

The article uses a case study design to examine youth perceptions of language in their struggle to acquire academic success. Data for this study were collected from the following sources: researcher field notes, classroom observations, audio- and videotaped “rap” sessions, formal and informal interview meetings, participants’ written responses to and verbal conversations on a series of 10 questions that we collaboratively designed over a 3-month period, and data member checking sessions.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The findings presented in this article highlight the potential for additional research on youth perceptions of language in relation to success and survival. Given current debates in educational research on student achievement, multiple perspectives, and the intersections of students’ lived experiences with pedagogical practices and teacher training, teachers and researchers should continue to identify the ways in which student voices, writings, and experiences are oftentimes excluded from schools. Students’ Right to Their Own Language is an important policy statement that questions U.S. mono-lingualism in multicultural, multilingual contexts.

“It's who we are. It's like telling me I gotta take off my culture and identity when I leave my hood and go to a place that don't care about me. Like schools. How can I leave me and my Black English home? I'm nobody's traitor.” —Phillip, youth participant 2007

“We affirm the students’ right to their own patterns and varieties of language—the dialects of their nurture or whatever dialects in which they find their own identity and style. Language scholars long ago denied that the myth of a standard American dialect has any validity. The claim that any one dialect is unacceptable amounts to an attempt of one social group to exert its dominance over another. Such a claim leads to false advice for speakers and writers, and immoral advice for humans. A nation proud of its diverse heritage and its cultural and racial variety will preserve its heritage of dialects. We affirm strongly that teachers must have the experiences and training that will enable them to respect diversity and uphold the right of students to their own language.” —Passed by the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Fall 1974 ¹

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alim

H. S.

, & Baugh

(Eds.). (2007). Talking that talk. New York: Teachers College Press.

Balester

(1993). Cultural divide: A study of African-American college-level writers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

Ball

(1992). Cultural preference and the expository writing of African American adolescents. Written Communication, 9, 501–532.

Ball

(1995). Text design patterns in the writing of urban African American students: Teaching to the strengths of students in multicultural settings. Urban Education, 30, 253–289.

Ball

A. F.

(1996). Expository writing patterns of African American students. The English Journal, 85, 27–36.

Ball

A. F.

(2000). Empowering pedagogies that enhance the learning of multicultural students. Teachers College Record, 102, 1006–1034.

Ball

A. F.

(2006). With more deliberate speed: Achieving equity and excellence in education—realizing the full potential of Brown v. Board of Education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Ball

, & Lardner

(1997). Dispositions toward language: Teacher constructs of knowledge and the Ann Arbor Black English case. College Composition and Communication, 48, 469–485.

Ball

, & Lardner

(2005). African American literacies unleashed: Vernacular English and the composition classroom. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

10.

Barone

D. M.

(2004). Case-study research. In Duke

& Mallette

(Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 7–27). New York: Guilford Press.

11.

Baugh

(1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.

12.

Baugh

(1995). The law, linguistics, and education: Educational reform for African American language minority students. Linguistics and Education, 7, 87–105.

13.

Baugh

(1999). Out of the mouths of slaves: African American language and educational malpractice. Austin: University of Texas Press.

14.

Baugh

(2006). Linguistic considerations pertaining to Brown vs. Board: Exposing racial fallacies in the new millennium. In Ball

(Ed.), With more deliberate speed: Achieving equity and excellence in education—realizing the full potential of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 90–103). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

15.

Compton-Lilly

(2003). Reading families: The literate lives of urban children. New York: Teachers College Press.

16.

Conference on College Composition and Communication. (1974). Students’ Right to Their Own Language. College Composition and Communication, 25(3), 1–32.

17.

Cushman

(1998). The struggle and the tools: Oral and literate strategies in an inner city community. Albany: State University of New York Press.

18.

Delpit

, & Dowdy

J. K.

(Eds.). (2002). The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom. New York: New Press.

19.

Dillard

J. L.

(1972). Black English: Its history and usage in the United States. New York: Vintage Books.

20.

Dyson

A. H.

(1999). Coach Bombay's kids learn to write: Children's appropriation of media material for school literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 367–401.

21.

DuBois

W. E. B.

(1989). The souls of Black folk. New York: Bantam Books. (Original work published 1903)

22.

Elbow

(2000). Everyone can write: Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Fisher

M. T.

(2007). Writing in rhythm: Spoken word poetry in urban classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

24.

Gee

J. P.

(1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171, 5–17.

25.

Gee

J. P.

(2001). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In Cushman

, Kintgen

E. R.

, Kroll

B. M.

, & Rose

(Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 525–544). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.

26.

Gilyard

(1991). Voices of the self: A study of language competence. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

27.

Gilyard

(1999). African American contributions to composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 50, 626–644.

28.

Hardman

(2006). The rights and wrongs of language variation: Employing everyday language in a classroom setting. Unpublished master's thesis, City College, City University of New York.

29.

Holloway

(1993). Cultural politics in the academic community: Masking the color line. College English, 55, 610–617.

30.

Hull

, & Schultz

(Eds.). (2002). School's out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

31.

Jordan

(1985). On call: Political essays. Boston: South End Press.

32.

Kelly

(1971). Guest editor's note. Negro American Literature Forum, 5, 79.

33.

Kinloch

(2004). June Jordan and the linguistic register: A statement about our rights. In Kinloch

& Grebowicz

(Eds.), Still seeking an attitude: Critical reflections on the work of June Jordan (pp. 71–86). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

34.

Kinloch

(2005a). Poetry, literacy, and creativity: Fostering effective learning strategies in an urban classroom. English Education, 37, 96–114.

35.

Kinloch

(2005b). Revisiting the promise of Students’ Right to Their Own Language: Pedagogical strategies. College Composition and Communication, 57, 83–113.

36.

Kinloch

(2007a). “The White-ification of the hood”: Power, politics, and youth performing narratives of community. Language Arts, 85, 61–68.

37.

Kinloch

(2007b). Youth representations of community, art, and struggle in Harlem (NYC). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 116, 37–50.

38.

Kinloch

(2009). Suspicious spatial distinctions: Literacy research with students across school and community contexts.” Written Communication, 26(2), 154–182.

39.

Kinloch

(2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York: Teachers College Press.

40.

Kirkland

(2008, March). Something to brag about: A sociolinguistic perspective on urban Black males and literacy. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New York, New York.

41.

Kirkland

, Jackson

, & Smitherman

(2001). Leroy, Big D, and Big Daddy speakin Ebonics on the internet. American Language Review, 5(2), 21–25.

42.

Klauke

(1989). Coping with changing demographics: ERIC Digest series number EA45. Eric Educational Reports. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov

43.

Kynard

(2007). “I want to be African”: In search of a Black radical tradition/African-American-vernacularized paradigm for “Students’ Right to Their Own Language,” critical literacy, and “class politics.” College English, 69, 360–390.

44.

Labov

(1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

45.

Lee

C. D.

(1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608–631.

46.

Lee

C. D.

(2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–142.

47.

Lee

C. D.

(2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.

48.

Lincoln

Y. S.

, & Guba

(2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In Denzin

N. K.

& Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

49.

Mahiri

(1998). Shooting for excellence. African American and youth culture in new century schools. Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teachers of English.

50.

Martin Luther King Elementary School Children v. Ann Arbor School District Board. Civil Action No. 7-71861. 473 F. Supp. 1371. (1979).

51.

Moll

, & Gonzalez

(2001). Lessons from research with language-minority children. In Cushman

, Kintgen

E. R.

, Kroll

B. M.

, & Rose

(Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 156–171). Boston: St. Martin's Press.

52.

National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Author.

53.

Pendergast

(2003). Literacy and racial justice: The politics of learning after Brown v. Board of Education. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

54.

Perry

, & Delpit

(1998). The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African American children. New York: Beacon Press.

55.

Portes

, & Hao

(2002). The price of uniformity: Language, family, and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 889–913.

56.

Rampton

(2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in a urban school. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Redd

, & Webb

(2005). A teacher's introduction to African American English: What a writing teacher should know. Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teachers of English.

58.

Richardson

(2003). African American literacies. London: Routledge.

59.

Rickford

(1977). The question of prior creolization of Black English. In Valdeman

(Ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics (pp. 199–221). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

60.

Rickford

(1987). Dimensions of a Creole continuum: History, texts, and linguistic analysis of Guyanese Creole. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

61.

Rickford

(1999). African American vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

62.

Rickford

, Ball

, & Blake

(1991). Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African American vernacular English. Language Variation and Change, 3, 103–132.

63.

Rickford

J. R.

, & Rickford

R. J.

(2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. New York: Wiley.

64.

Schieffelin

B. B.

, Woolard

K. A.

, & Kroskrity

P. V.

(Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

65.

Schultz

(2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York: Teachers College Press.

66.

Simons

(1980). Towards a science of the singular: Essays about case study in educational research and evaluation. Norwich, England: University of East Anglia, Center for Applied Research in Education.

67.

Smitherman

(1975). Black language and culture: Sounds of soul. New York: Harper and Row.

68.

Smitherman

(1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

69.

Smitherman

(2000). Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America. New York: Routledge.

70.

Smitherman

(2003). The historical struggle for language rights in CCCC. In Smitherman

& Villanueva

(Eds.), Language diversity in the classroom: From intention to practice (pp. 7–39). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

71.

Stake

(2000). Case studies. In Denzin

& Lincoln

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

72.

Stoller

(Ed.). (1975). Black American English. New York: Dell.

73.

Street

B. V.

(2003). What's “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

74.

Street

B. V.

(2005). Recent applications of new literacy studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 417–423.

75.

Yin

(1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

76.

Yin

(1993). Applications to case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.