ArchambaultÉ., Vignola-GagnéÉ., CôtéG., LarivièreV., & GingrasY. (2005, July). Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm: ISSI.
5.
BellD. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BöhmeG., & StehrN. (1986). The knowledge society: The growing impact of scientific knowledge on social relations. Dordrecht: Reidel.
7.
BollenJ., Van de SompelH., SmithJ.A., & LuceR. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information & Processing Management, 41(6), 1419–1440.
8.
BrunssonN. (1999). The organization of hypocrisy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
BushV. (1945). Science: The endless frontier: A report to the president. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10.
CavallinM., & LindbladS. (2006). Världsmästerskap i vetenskap? En granskning av internationella rankinglistor och deras sätt att hantera kvaliteter hos universitetet. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet Dnr G11 530/06.
11.
DillD.D., & SooM. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and policy: A crossnational analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.
12.
DjelicM.-L., & Sahlin-AnderssonK. (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DroriG., MeyerJ., RamirezF., & SchoferE. (2003). Science in the modern world polity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
DruckerP.F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.
GibbonsM., LimogesC., NowotnyH., SchwartzmanS., ScottP., & TrowM. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.
17.
JobbinsD. (2005). Moving to a global stage: A media view. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 137–145.
LatourB. (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity. London: Sage.
20.
LindbladS. (2008). Navigating in the field of university positioning: On international ranking lists, quality indicators and higher education governing. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 438–450.
21.
LindbladS., & PopkewitzT.S. (2004). Educational restructuring: International perspectives on traveling policies. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
MarginsonS. (2009). University rankings, government and social order: Managing the field of higher education according to the logic of the performative present-as-future. In SimonsM., OlssenM., & PetersM. (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: Studying the policy agenda of the 21st century. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
24.
MeyerJ., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
25.
MoedH.F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
26.
NowotnyH., GibbonsM., & ScottP. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
OppenheimC. (1997). The correlation between citations counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise. Journal of documentation, 53(5), 477–487.
28.
RamirezF. (2002). Eyes wide shut: University, state, and society. European Educational Research Journal, 1, 255–271.
29.
RothblattS., & WittrockB. (Eds.) (1993). The European and American university since 1800: Historical and sociological essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SlaughterS., & RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
31.
Steiner-KhamsiG. (Ed.) (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 201–220). New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
StuartD.L. (1995). Reputational rankings: Background and development. In WalleriR.D. & MossM.K. (Eds.), New directions for institutional research No. 88: Evaluating and responding to college guidebooks and rankings (pp. 13–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
TomuskV. (Ed.) (2006). Creating the European area of higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
van RaanA.F.J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.
36.
WedlinL. (2007). The role of rankings in codifying a business school template: Classifications, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields. European Management Review, 4(1), 24–39.
37.
WhitleyR. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.