BakerJ., & CarterC. E. (2007). The District of Columbia Public Charter School Board: 10 years of exploration and discovery 1997–2007: A brief history. Washington, DC: District of Columbia Public Charter School Board.
2.
BellC. (2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115, 493–521.
BrinsonS. (2004, September 7). City sued over unequal schools: Parents seek to halt flow of public dollars to charters. The Common Denominator. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://www.thecommondenominator.com/090704_news1.html
5.
BuckleyJ., & SchneiderM. (2003). Making the grade: Comparing D.C. charter schools with other D.C. public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 2.
6.
BuckleyJ., & SchneiderM. (2004). Charter schools as a tool to reform local schools by transforming governance. In FeiockR. C. (Ed.), Metropolitan governance (pp. 183–211). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7.
BuckleyC., & SchneiderM. (2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BulkleyK. (2005). Losing voice? Educational management organizations and charter schools’ educational programs. Educational and Urban Society, 37, 204–234.
9.
Center for Education Reform. (2009a). The race to the top for charter schools. Which states have what it takes to win? Ranking and scorecard 2009 Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://www.edreform.com/_upload/ranking_chart.pdf
ChristensenJ., & LakeR. J. (2007). The national charter school landscape in 2007. In LakeR. J. (Ed.), Hopes, fears, and reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2007 (pp. 1–15). Seattle: University of Washington. National Charter School Research Project.
12.
CooperB. S., & RandallE. V. (2008). Fear and privatization. Educational Policy, 22, 204–227.
13.
CrowsonR. L., BoydW. L., & MawhinneyH. B. (1996). Introduction and overview: The new institutionalism and the politics of reinventing the American school. In CrowsonR. L., BoydW. L., & MawhinneyH. B. (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American School (pp. 1–6). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
14.
DiMaggioP. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1920–1940). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
DiMaggioP. J., & PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
District of Columbia Public Charter School Board. (2009b, September 1). Public charter school board launches new performance framework to hold schools much more accountable for success. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.dcpubliccharter.com/News-Room.aspx?ed=114
18.
District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995, approved April 26,. 1996 (110 Stat. 1321-107; D.C. Official Code § 38-1800.01
Friends of Choice in Urban Schools. (2004, September 7). District, federal officials sued over public charter school program; startup PCS also named as defendant. D.C. Public Charter School Bulletin. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://www.focusdc.org/archiveslaws/bulletins/040907.html
Friends of Choice in Urban Schools. (2009). Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://www.focusdc.org
23.
FusarelliL. D. (2003). The political dynamics of school choice: Negotiating contested terrain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Government Accountability Office. (2009, June). District of Columbia Schools: Important steps taken to continue reform efforts, but enhanced planning could improve implementation and sustainability (GAO-09-619). Washington, DC: Author.
26.
HenigJ. R. (2008). Spin cycle: How research is used in policy debates: The case of charter schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
Henig, J. R. (2009a). Geo-spatial analyses and school choice research. American Journal of Education, 115, 649–657.
28.
Henig, J. R. (2009b). The education mayor: Improving America's schools. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 770–773.
29.
HenigJ. R., & StoneC. N. (2008). Rethinking school reform: The distractions of dogma and the potential for a new politics of progressive pragmatismAmerican Journal of Education, 114, 191–218.
30.
HolyokeT. T., HenigJ. R., BrownH., & Lacireno-PaquetN. (2007). Institution advocacy and the political behavior of charter schools. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 202–214.
31.
HolyokeT. T., HenigJ. R., BrownH., & Lacireno-PaquetN. (2009). Policy dynamics and the evolution of state charter school laws. Policy Sciences, 42, 33–55.
32.
ImbermanS. A. (2007). Achievement and behavior in charter schools: Drawing a more complete picture. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
33.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
JessopB., BrennerN., & JonesM. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–408.
35.
KirstM. (2006). Politics of charter schools: Competing national advocacy coalitions meet local politics. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
36.
LabareeD. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 39–81.
37.
LakeR. J. (Ed.). Hopes, fears, and reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2007. Seattle: University of Washington. National Charter School Research Project.
38.
LeitnerH., SheppardE., & SziartoK. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 157–172.
39.
LevinH. M. (2000). The public-private nexus in education (Occasional Paper No. 1). New York: Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
40.
LubienskiC. (2001). Redefining “public” education: Charter schools, common schools, and the rhetoric of reform. Teachers College Record, 103, 634–666.
41.
LubienskiC., & DoughertyJ. (2009). Mapping educational opportunity: Spatial analysis and school choices. American Journal of Education, 115, 485–491.
42.
LubienskiC., GulosinoC., & WeitzelP. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115, 601–647.
43.
MawhinneyH.B. (1996). New institutionalism and the reinvention of schools. In CrowsonR. L., BoydW. L. & MawhinneyH. B. (Eds), The new institutionalism in the politics of education (pp. 23–42). Washington: Falmer Press.
44.
MawhinneyH. B. (2001). Theoretical approaches to understanding interest groups. Educational Policy, 15, 187–214.
45.
MawhinneyH. B. (2008). Towards a new political landscape praxis in the rescaled space of urban educational governance. In CooperB. S., CibulkaJ. G., & FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 411–427). New York: Routledge.
46.
McDonnellL. (2009). A political science perspective on educational policy analysis. In SykesG., SchneiderB., & PlankD. N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 57–70). New York: Routledge.
47.
MironG. J. (2008). The shifting notion of “publicness” in public education. In CooperB. S., CibulkaJ. G., & FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 338–349). New York: Routledge.
48.
MironG., & NelsonC. (2002). What's public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
MontgomeryL., & MathewsJ. (2006, August 22). The future of D.C. public schools: Traditional or charter education?The Washington Post, p. A1.
50.
Office of the State Superintendent of Education, District of Columbia. (2009, August 14). D.C. students’ reading and math scores rise in 2009. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://osse.dc.gov
51.
Public Education Reform Amendment Act of 2007 (District of Columbia Laws, Act 17-38 2007), Public L. No. 110-33. RofesE. E., & StalbergL. M. (Eds.). (2004). The emancipatory promise of charter schools: Towards a progressive politics of school choice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
52.
ScottJ. T., LubienskiC. A., & DeBray-PelotE. H. (2008). The ideological and political landscape of school choice interest groups in the post-Zelman era. In CooperB. S., CibulkaJ. G., & FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 1246–1262). New York: Routledge.
53.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
ScottW. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1–21.
55.
ScottW. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In SmithK. G. & HittM. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: the process of theory development (pp. 460–484). New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
ScottW. R. (2008a). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
ScottW. R. (2008b). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theoretical Sociology, 37, 427–442.
58.
TillyC. (2004). Contentious choices. Theory and Society, 33, 473–481.
59.
TillyC. (2006). Afterword: Political ethnography as art and science. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 409–412.
60.
VentrescaM. J., & MohrJ. W. (2002). Archival research methods. In BaumJ. A. C. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 805–828). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
61.
VergariS. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 15–39.
62.
VergariS. (2009). Charter school policy issues and research questions. In SykesG., SchneiderB., & PlankD. N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 478–490). New York: Routledge.
63.
WongK. K. (2008). Federalism, equity, and accountability in education. In CooperB. S., CibulkaJ. G., & FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 19–29). New York: Routledge.
64.
WongK. K., ShenF. X., AnagnostopolousD., & RutledgeS. (2007). The education mayor: Improving America's schools. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.