The Pushes and Pulls of New Localism: School-Level Instructional Arrangements,Instructional Resources,and Family-Community Partnerships

American Association of School Administrators (1965). Departmentalization in elementary schools (ERIC document reproduction Service No. ED017329).

Anagnostopoulos D. (2003). The new accountability, student failure, and teachers’ work in urban high schools. Educational Policy, 17(3), 291–316.

Anagnostopoulos D. , & Rutledge S.A. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261–1302.

Arsen D. , Plank D. , & Sykes G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

Au W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.

Au W. (2008). Devising inequality: A Bernsteinian analysis of high-stakes testing and social reproduction in education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 639–651.

Bailey M.A. , & Rom M.C. (2004). A wider race: Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics, 66, 326–347.

Barr R. , & Dreeben R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Becker H.J. (1987). Addressing the needs of different groups of early adolescents: Effects of varying school and classroom organizational practices on students from different social backgrounds and abilities (Rep. No. 16). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.

Belfield C.R. , & Levin H.M. (2009). Market reforms in education. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 513–527). New York: Routledge.

Berry J. (1989). The Interest Group Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Berry F.S. , & Baybeck B. (2005). Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review 99(4), 505–519.

Bidwell C.E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100–114.

Bidwell C.E. , Frank K.A. , & Quiroz P.A. (1997). Teacher types, workplace controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70, 285–307.

Brantlinger E. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Carnegie Task Force on the Education of Young Adolescents (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.

Carnoy M. (2008, February 27). State's economy needs more college-educated Latinos. San Jose Mercury News, http://ed.stanford.edu/suse/news-bureau/displayRecord.php?tablename=susenews&id=418

Cartwright G.P. , & McIntosh D.K. (1972). Three approaches to grouping procedures for the education of disadvantaged primary school children. Journal of Educational Research, 65, 425–429.

Coburn C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.

Cohen D.K. (1982). Policy and organization: The impact of state and federal educational policy in school governance. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 474–499.

Cohen D.K & Moffit S.L. . (2009). The Ordeal of Equality: Did Federal Regulation Fix the Schools? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cohen-Vogel L. (2005). Federal role in teacher quality: “Redefinition” or policy alignment? Educational Policy, 19(1), 18–43.

Cohen-Vogel L. (2008, November). Staffing to the test: Have school personnel practices become evidence-based? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration. Orlando, FL.

Cohen-Vogel L. & Ingle K. (2007). When neighbors matter most: Innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (3), 241–262.

Cohen-Vogel L. , Ingle K. , Albee A. & Spence M. (2008). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia and interstate competition. Educational Policy.

Cohen-Vogel L. , & McLendon M. (2009). New approaches to understanding federal involvement in education. In Plank D. , Sykes G. , & Schneider B. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research. A handbook for the American Educational Research Association (pp. 735–748). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Crowson R. L. (1992). School-community relations, under reform. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Cuban L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Cuban L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19 (1), 3–13.

Cuban L. (2009). ‘Hugging the middle’: Why good teaching ignores ideology. Education Week, April 29.

Davis E.D. (1977). Alternative learning environments in the elementary school. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of Elementary School Principals, Las Vegas, NV.

DeBray E. , Parson G. , & Avila S. (2003). Internal alignment and external pressure: High school responses in four state contexts. In Carnoy M. , El-more R. , & Siskin L.S. (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high stakes testing (pp. 55–85). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Des Moines Public Schools (1989). Elementary school organization: Self-contained and departmentalized classroom structures (ERIC document reproduction Service No. ED311546.

Diamond J. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80, 285–313.

Diamond J. , & Spillane J.P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1145–1176.

Downs A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.

Dye T.R. (1990). American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Ediger M. (2000). Grouping pupils for instruction (ERIC document reproduction Service No. 441238).

Ediger M. (2002). Grouping and organization for instruction in reading (ERIC document reproduction Service No. 471842).

Ellis M. (2008). Leaving No Child Behind Yet Allowing None Too Far Ahead: Ensuring (In)Equity in Mathematics Education Through the Science of Measurement and Instruction. Teachers College Record, 110 (6), pp. 1330–1356.

Elmore R. , & Fuhrman S. (1994). Governing curriculum: Changing patterns in policy, politics, and practice. In Elmore R. & Fuhrman S. (Eds.), The governance of curriculum: 1994 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 1–10). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Elmore R. , & Fuhrman S.H. (1990). The national interest and the federal role in education. Publius, 20(3), 149–162.

Elmore R. F. , Peterson P. L. , & McCarthey S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Epstein J.L. (1990). What matters in the middle grades—grade span or practices? Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 438–444.

Epstein J.L. (2005). Attainable goals? The spirit and letter of the No Child Left Behind Act on parental involvement. Sociology of Education, 78(2), 179–182.

Epstein J.L. , & Dauber S.L. (1991). School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 289–305.

Firestone W.A. , Mayrowetz D. , & Fairman J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(5), 95–113.

Fuhrman S.H. , Clune W. , & Elmore R.F. (1988). Research on education reform: Lessons on the implementation of policy. Teachers College Record, 90(2), 237–258.

Gamoran A. (1992). Is ability grouping equitable? Educational Leadership, 50(2), 11–17.

Gamoran A. , & Weinstein M. (1995). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools Report for Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education (ERIC document reproduction Service No. ED386828)

Gibb E.G. , & Matala D.C. (1962). Study on the use of special teachers of science and mathematics in grades 5 and 6. School Science and Mathematics, 62, 565–585.

Goodlad J.I. (1960). Classroom organization. In Harris C.W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 221–226). New York: Macmillan.

Greene G. K. , Huerta L. A. & Richards C. E. (2007). Getting real: A different perspective on the relationship between school resources and student outcomes. Journal of Education Finance, 33(1), 49–68.

Grubb W.N. , Goe L. , & Huerta L.A. (2004). The unending search for equity: California policy, the improved school finance, and the Williams case. Teachers College Record, 106, 2081–2101.

Guskey T. R. (February, 2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60, 7–11.

Hallinan M. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.

Hanushek E.A. , Kain J.F. , & Rivkin S.G. (2005, March). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

Hassrick E.M. , & Schneider B. (2008). Parent surveillance in schools: A question of social class. American Journal of Education, 115, 195–225.

Hayes M. (2001). The Limits of Policy Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Henig J. , & Stone C. (2008). Rethinking school reform: The distractions of dogma and the potential for a new politics of progressive pragmatism. American Journal of Education, 114(2), 191–218.

Hess F.M. (2009). A market for knowledge? In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 502–512). New York: Routledge.

Hosley C.T. (1954). Learning outcomes of sixth grade pupils under alternate grade organization patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Jackson J. (1953). The effect of classroom organization and guidance practice upon the personality adjustment and academic growth of students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83, 159–170.

Jarvis O.T. (1967). Teaching specialists in intermediate grades. Education, 87, 491–493.

Jenkins J. (2000). Looking backward: Educational reform in the twentieth century. International Journal of Educational Reform, 9(1), 74–78.

Jennings J. , & Stark D. (2006). Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 110–113.

Kaestle C. (2006). Foreword. In DeBray E.H. (Ed.), Politics, ideology, and education: Federal policy during the Clinton and Bush administrations (pp. xi–xv). New York: Teachers College Press.

Kim J. , & Sunderman G. L. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 3–13.

Ladd H.F. , & Zelli A. (2002). School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 494–529.

Lamme L. (1976). Self-contained to departmentalized: How reading habits changed. The Elementary School Journal, 76(4), 208–218.

Lareau A. (2000). Home advantage. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Lareau A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lemons R. , Luschei T.F. , & Siskin L.S. (2003). Leadership and the demands of standards based accountability. In Carnoy M. , Elmore R. , & Siskin L.S. (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 99–128). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Levin J. , & Quinn M. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.

Levin J. , Mulhern J. , & Schunck J. (2005). Unintended consequences: The case for reforming staffing rules in urban teachers union contracts. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.

Liu E. , Rosenstein J.G. , Swan A.E. & Khalil D. (2008). When Districts Encounter Teacher Shortages: The Challenges of Recruiting and Retaining Mathematics Teachers in Urban Districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools 7 (3), 296–323.

Louis K.S. , Febey K. , & Schroeder R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177–204.

Lounsbury J.H. (1988). The sixth grade: Caught in the middle Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals (Eric document reproduction Service No. ED296797)

Loveless T. (1998). The tracking and ability grouping debate. The Fordham Report. Washington, DC: The Fordham Foundation.

Lubienski C. (2004). Charter school innovation in theory and practice: Autonomy, R&D, and curricular conformity. In Bulkley K.E. & Wohlsetter P. (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What's happened and what's next? (pp. 72–90). New York: Teachers College Press.

Lucas S. (1999). Tracking inequality. New York: Teachers College Press.

Lyons J. E. , & Algozzine B. (2006). Perceptions of the impact of accountability on the role of principals. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14 (16). Retrieved June 19, 2006 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n16/

Mac Iver D.J. (1989). Effective practices and structures for middle grades education. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Policy and Planning Center.

Mac Iver D.J. , & Epstein J.L. (1990). How equal are opportunities for learning in the middle grades in disadvantaged and advantaged schools? (Rep. No. 7). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students.

Mac Iver D.J. , & Epstein J.L. (1993). Middle grades research: Not yet mature, but no longer a child. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 519–533.

Manna P. (2006). School's in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

March J. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 563–577.

March J.G. , & Olsen J.P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factor in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.

Mayhew D. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

McDermott K.A. (2005). In MINT condition? The politics of alternative certification and pay incentives for teachers in Massachusetts. Educational Policy, 19(1), 44–62.

McDermott K.A. (2009). The expansion of state policy research. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 749–766). New York: Routledge.

McDonnell L. (2005). No Child Left Behind. and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution? Peabody Journal of Education 80(2), 19–38.

McDonnell L.M. (2009). A political science perspective on education policy analysis. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 57–70). New York: Routledge.

McGuinn P.J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965–2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

McLendon M. , & Cohen-Vogel L. (2008). Understanding educational policy-making in the American states: Lessons from political science. In Cooper B.S. , Fusarelli L. , & Cibulka J. (Eds.), Handbook of educational politics and policy (pp. 30–51). Oxford: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

McPartland J.M. (1987). Balancing high-quality subject matter instruction with positive teacher-student relations in the middle grades (Report No. 15). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.

McPartland J. M. (1990). Staffing decisions in the middle grades: Balancing quality instruction and teacher/student relations. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 465–469.

McPartland J.M. (1992). Staffing patterns and the social organization of schools for early adolescents. Paper presented at the fourth biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Washington, DC.

Metz M.H. (1986). Different by design: The context and character of three magnet schools. New York: Routledge.

Mickelson R. & Everett B.J. (2008). Neotracking in North Carolina: How High School Courses of Study Reproduce Race and Class-Based Stratification. Teachers College Record, 110 (3), pp. 535–570.

Mintrop H. (2004). Schools on probation: How accountability works (and doesn't work). New York: Teachers College Press.

National Education Association (1966). Departmentalization in elementary schools. NEA Research Bulletin, 44, 27–28.

Oakes J. (1985). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Oakes J. (2005). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality (2nd edition). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Oakes J. (2008). Keeping Track: Structuring Equality and Inequality in an Era of Accountability. Teachers College Record, 110 (3), pp. 700–712.

Ogawa R.T. (2009). Improvement or reinvention: Two policy approaches to school reform. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 534–540). New York: Routledge.

Pedulla J.J. , Abrams L.M. , Madaus G.F. , Russell M.K. , Ramos M.A. , & Miao J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

Pierson P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.

Powell W.W. , & DiMaggio P.J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Renter D.S. , Scott C. , Kober N. , Chudowsky N. , Joftus S. , & Zabala D. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

Rice J.K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Rivkin S. G. , Hanushek E. , & Kain J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

Roellke C. & Rice J.K. (2008). Responding to Teacher Quality and Accountability Mandates: The Perspective of School Administrators and Classroom Teachers. Leadership and Policy in Schools 7 (3): 264–295.

Rofes E. (1998). How are school districts responding to charter laws and charter schools?. Berkeley: University of California, Policy Analysis for California Education.

Rowan B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16, 359–389.

Rutledge S.A. (2008, April). Setting standards: A comparison of parental and policy pressure on school administrators’ and teachers’ work. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association.

Rutledge S.A. (2010). Contest for jurisdiction: What school sanctioning reveals about work in schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools.

Rutledge S.A. , Harris D.N. , & Ingle W.K. (February, 2010). Bridge or buffer? How federal, state, and district policies shape teacher hiring practices. American Journal of Education.

Sabatier P.A. , & Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In Sabatier P.A. (ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Sanders W. , & Horn S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247–256.

Schattschneider E.E. 1975). The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Wadsworth.

Smrekar C. (1996). The impact of school choice and community: In the interest of families and schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Smrekar C. , & Cohen-Vogel L. (2001). The voices of parents: Rethinking the intersection of family and school. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 75–100.

Smylie M. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3–7.

Spillane J. (1998). State Policy and the Non-Monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 35, (1), pp. 33–63.

Spillane J.P. , Gomez L.M. , & Mesler L. (2009). Notes on reframing the role of organizations in policy implementation: Resources for practice, in practice. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 409–425). New York: Routledge.

Stimson J. , MacKuen M. & Erikson R. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 545–559.

Sui-Chu E.H. , & Willms J.D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 126–141.

Sunderman G. , Kim J.S. , & Orfield G. (2005). NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Tate W. F. (1994). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 477–484.

Tate W. F. (2000). Summary: Some final thoughts on changing the faces of mathematics. In Secada W. G. (Ed.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on African Americans (pp. 201–207). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Taylor G. , Shepard L. , Kinner F. , & Rosenthal J. (2001, September). A survey of teachers’ perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost. Boulder, CO: CRESST/CREDE/University of Colorado at Boulder. Retrieved October 9, 2009 from http://www.colorado.edu/education/centersoutreach/cresst.html

Teske P. , Schneider M. , Buckley J. , & Clark S. (2001). Can charter schools change traditional public schools? In Peterson P.E. & Campbell D.E. (Eds.), Charters, vouchers and public education (pp. 188–214). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Tyack D. (1995). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In Hannaway J. & Carnoy M. (Eds.), Decentralization and School Improvement (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Tyack D. , & Cuban L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vergari S. (2009). Charter school policy issues and research questions. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 478–490). New York: Routledge.

Vogler K. E. (2003). An integrated curriculum using state standards in a high-stakes testing environment. Middle School Journal, 34(4), 5–10.

Walker J.L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174–1185.

Wayne A.J. , & Youngs P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.

Wilson S. , & Floden R. (2003). Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions. New York: AACTE Publications.

Wirt F.M. , & Kirst M.W. (2005). The political dynamics of American education (3rd ed.). Richmond, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

Witte J.F. (2009). Vouchers. In Sykes G. , Schneider B. , & Plank D.N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 491–501). New York: Routledge.

Woods R.C. (1959). Relative merits of departmental and non-departmental elementary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 37, 161–169.

Zimmer R. , Gill B. , Razquin P. , Booker K. , & Lockwood J.R. III. (2007). State and local implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act.” Volume I—Title I school choice, supplemental educational services, and student achievement. A Report from the National Longitudinal Study of “No Child Left Behind.” Available at http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED497259&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED497259