BoydW.L. (2003). Public education's crisis of performance and legitimacy: Introduction and overview of the yearbook. In BoydW.L. & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges. 102nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 1–19). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
BransfordJ., BrownA., & CockingR. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3.
CarterS.C. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing, high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
4.
ChaskinR.J., BrownP., VenkateshS., & VidalA. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
5.
CohenD.K., MoffittS.L., & GoldinS. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 515–548.
6.
CrabtreeJ., DaviesW., & RandleA. (2007). Invisible villages: Techno localism and the enabling council. New Local Government Network. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics
7.
GewertzC. (2008). Consensus on learning time builds. Education Week, 28(5), 1, 14–18.
8.
GinsbergR., & CooperB.S. (Eds.) (2008). Fear and the emerging politics of education reform. A Politics of Education Association Special Issue in Educational Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9.
GoetzE.G., & ClarkeS.E. (Eds.) (1993). The new localism: Comparative politics in a global era. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
GoldringE., & HausmanC. (2001). Civic capacity and school principals: The missing link for community development. In CrowsonR.L. (Ed.), Community development and school reform (pp. 193–209). London: Elsevier Science, Ltd.
11.
HarrisD.N. (2007). High-flying schools, student disadvantage, and the logic of NCLB. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 367–394.
12.
HenigJ.R., & StoneC.N. (2008). Rethinking school reform: The distractions of dogma and the potential for a new politics of progressive pragmatism. American Journal of Education, 114(3), 191–218.
13.
HillL.D. (2005). Mobilizing community resources to reform failing schools. In HedgesL.V. & SchneiderB. (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 301–319). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
JanowitzM. (1967). The community press in an urban setting (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
JuddD., & ParkinsonM. (Eds.) (1990). Leadership and urban regeneration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
KirstM. (2008). A ‘Rosetta Stone’ for the achievement gap: Integrating outside community services and better teaching could lead to success. A paper prepared with support of the School Finance Redesign Project at the Center for Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
17.
LindkvistH.L. (2008). The reach and limits of cultural accommodation: Public schools and Somali Muslim immigrants in Maine. In MinowM., SchwederR.A., & MarkusH. (Eds.), Just schools: Pursuing equality in societies of difference (pp. 164–203). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
MacedoS. (2000). Diversity and distrust: Civic education in a multicultural democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
ManzoK.K. (2008). Election renews controversy over social justice teaching. Education Week, 28(10), 1, 12–13.
20.
MarkusH.R. (2008). Identity matters: Ethnicity, race, and the American dream. In MinowM., SchwederR.A., & MarkusH. (Eds.), Just schools: Pursuing equality in societies of difference (pp. 63–98). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
MasseyD.S. (Ed.) (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
MaxwellL.A. (2008a). Community organizing portrayed as plus for city schools. Education Week, 27(33), 10.
23.
MaxwellL. A. (2008b). New coalition backs community schools, focus on partnerships. Education Week, 28(5), 8.
24.
MayoE., & MooreH. (2001). Mutualizing the state—How local communities can run public schools. New Economics Foundation Pocketbook. Available at http://hewwns.Ccaledonia.org.uk/mutualizing.HTM
25.
MorrisD.J., & HessK. (1975). Neighborhood power: The new localism. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
MorrisJ.E., & MonroeC.J. (2008). Why study the U.S. South? The nexus of race and place in investigating Black student achievement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
OrfieldG., & FrankenbergE. (2007). The integration decision: What's next for educators and for society, after the U.S. Supreme Court's policy?Education Week, 26(43), 34, 44.
28.
PayneC.M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
29.
PowellM. (2004, September). In search of new and old localism. A paper prepared for conference presentation, University of Bath, UK.
30.
PratchettL. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the “new localism.” Political Studies, 52(2), 358–375.
31.
RothmanR. (Ed.) (2007). City schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
32.
RothsteinR. (2004). Class and schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
SabelC.F. (1994). Learning by mentoring. In RodwinL. & SchonD.A. (Eds.), Rethinking the development experience (pp. 231–274). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
34.
SaegertS., ThompsonJ.P., & WarrenM.R. (Eds.) (2001). Social capital and poor communities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
SanyalB. (1994). Social construction of hope. In RodwinL. & SchonD.A. (Eds.), Rethinking the development experience (pp. 131–144). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
36.
SchraggerR.C. (2001). The limits of localism. Michigan Law Review, 100(2), 371–472.
37.
SmrekarC., & Cohen-VogelL. (2001). The voices of parents: Rethinking the intersection of family and school. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 75–100.
38.
TieboutC. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
39.
WalshM. (2008). Parents lose federal challenge on gay-tolerant school materials. Education Week, 27(22), 4.
40.
WilderT., AllgoodW., & RothsteinR. (2008, November). Narrowing the achievement gap for low-income children: A 19-year life cycle approach. Paper prepared for the 2008 Equity Symposium of the Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University.
41.
YoshikawaH., WeisnerT., & LoweE.D. (Eds.) (2006). Making it work: Low-wage employment, family life, and child development. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.