Urban District Central Office Transformation for Teaching and Learning Improvement: Beyond a Zero-Sum Game

Berends M. , Bodilly S.J. , & Kirby S.M. (2002). The future of whole school designs: Conclusions, observations, and policy implications. In Berends M. , Bodilly S.J. , & Kirby S.M. (Eds.), Facing the challenges of whole school reform: New American schools after a decade (pp. 142–154). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Brown J.S. , & Duguid P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40–57.

Burch P. , & Spillane J.P. (2005). How subjects matter in district office practice: Instructionally relevant policy in urban school district redesign. Journal of Educational Change, 6(1), 51–76.

Collins A.M. , Brown J.S. , & Holum A. (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. In The principles of learning: Study tools for educators CD-ROM. Pittsburgh, PA: Institute for Learning, University of Pittsburgh.

Copland M. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–396.

Corcoran T. , Fuhrman S.H. , & Blecher C.L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 78–84.

Elmore R. , & Burney D. (1998). Continuous improvement in community District #2, New York City. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, HPLC Project, Learning Research and Development Center.

Elmore R.F. , & Fuhrman S.H. (1990). Understanding local control in the wake of state education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 82–96.

Gamson D. (2009). The once and future district. Unpublished manuscript. College Station, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.

Grossman P. , Wineburg S. , & Woolworth S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.

Hightower A. (2002). San Diego's big boom: District bureaucracy supports culture of learning. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

Honig M.I. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 292–338.

Honig M.I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383.

Honig M.I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114, 627–664.

Honig M.I. (2009). No small thing: School district central office bureaucracies and the implementation of New Small Autonomous Schools Initiatives. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 387–422.

Honig M.I. , & Copland M.A. (2008). Reinventing district central offices to expand student learning. Washington, DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.

Honig M.I. , Copland M.A. , Lorton J.A. , Rainey L.R. , & Newton M. (2009). Central office transformation for districtwide teaching and learning improvement: A report to the Wallace Foundation. Seattle: The Center for Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Hubbard L. , Mehan H. , & Stein M.K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.

Lave J. , & Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee C.D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141.

Lieberman A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.

Malen B. (2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon: The case of reconstitution policies. In Honig M.I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 83–104). Albany: The State University of New York Press.

Malen B. , Ogawa R.T. , & Kranz J. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In Clune W.H. & White J.F. (Eds.), Choice and control in American schools (pp. 289–342). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.

Mintrop H. (2004). Schools on probation: How accountability works (and doesn't work). New York: Teachers College Press.

O'Day J.A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 1–31.

Purkey S. , & Smith M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427–462.

Rogoff B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sabatier P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research. Journal of Public Policy, 6(January), 21–48.

Smagorinsky P. , Cook L.S. , & Johnson T.S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1399–1436.

Smith M.S. , & O'Day J.A. (1991). Systemic school reform. In Fuhrman S.H. & Malen B. (Eds.), Politics of Education Association yearbook 1990 (pp. 233–267). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Spillane J.P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63.

Spillane J.P. , & Thompson C.L. (1997). Reconstruction conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203.

Stein M.K. , & Nelson B. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448.

Supovitz J.A. (2002). Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1591–1626.

Supovitz J.A. (2006). The case for district-based reform: Leading, building and sustaining school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Swinnerton J.A. (2006). Learning to lead what you “don't (yet) know”: District leaders engaged in instructional reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.

Tharp R.G. , & Gallimore R. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas W.B. , & Moran K.J. (1992). Reconsidering the power of the superintendent in the progressive period. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 22–50.

Vander Ark T. (2002). Toward success at scale. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(4), 322.

Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.