The current national debate over the purposes of civic education is largely tied to outdated notions of citizenship that overlook its changing nature under globalization. Civic education is based on a legalistic understanding of citizenship that emphasizes patriotism and the structures and functions of government. This study examined adolescents’ civic beliefs and affiliations, drawing on theories of transnational and global citizenship.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
The purpose was to examine diverse adolescents’ vocabularies of citizenship, a concept that captures the tensions in their civic beliefs and affiliations. Their vocabularies were explored in terms of two topics at the intersection of national and global affiliations: universal human rights and global citizenship. The central question asked was: How do adolescents from immigrant backgrounds understand the tensions between national and global civic affiliations, and do they differ from dominant-culture adolescents’ understandings?
Setting
The research setting was the Pennsylvania Governor's School for International Studies, a 5-week summer program for high school students that emphasizes current scholarship and skills in international affairs, cultural studies, and foreign language.
Research Design
A mixed-method case study design was employed to collect detailed and rich data on the students’ beliefs about citizenship.
Findings/Results
The findings showed that the students from immigrant backgrounds favored universal positions and were the only students to call attention to national economic inequalities. In contrast, a majority of the dominant-culture students gave a more central role to national affiliations. However, over half of the students switched between universal and nationally oriented positions for the issues of global citizenship and human rights. It is argued that these switches represent a strong indication of the tensions in civic affiliations in light of globalization.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The findings presented here suggest that the question of either national- or global-oriented civic education makes little sense. This research suggests that differentiated forms of civic education are needed if all youth will have access to full citizenship and the range of civic affiliations needed in the world. Two approaches for reconceptualizing civic education are proposed: Civic education curricula should focus on the intersection of national with global issues and affiliations, and civic education should address, in addition to civic attitudes, skills, and knowledge, a conscious effort to help adolescents build flexible and multiple civic identities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. M., & CarfagnaA. (2006). Coming of age in a globalized world: The next generation. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
2.
Anderson-LevittK. (2004). Reading lessons in Guinea, France, and the United States: Local meanings or global culture?Comparative Education Review, 48, 229–252.
3.
AppiahK. A. (1998). Cosmopolitan patriots. In CheahP. & RobbinsB. (Eds.), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation (pp. 91–114). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
ArchibugiD., & HeldD. (Eds.). (1995). Cosmopolitan democracy: An agenda for a new world order. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
5.
ArchibugiD., HeldD., & KöhlerM. (Eds.). (1998). Re-imagining political community: Studies in cosmopolitan democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
AsanovaJ. (2005). Educational experiences of immigrant students from the former Soviet Union: A case study of an ethnic school in Toronto.Educational Studies, 31, 181–195.
7.
AveryP. G., & SimmonsA. M. (2000-2001). Civic life as conveyed in United States civics and history textbooks.International Journal of Social Education, 15(2), 105–130.
8.
BanksJ. (Ed.). (2004). Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
BasseyM. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
BealT., & SosF. (2001). Asian nationalism in the diaspora: The case of Taiwanese astronauts. In StarrsR. (Ed.), Asian nationalism in an age of globalization (pp. 124–143). Richmond, England: Curzon Press.
12.
BennouneK. (2002). “Sovereignty vs. suffering”? Re-examining sovereignty and human rights through the lens of Iraq.European Journal of International Law, 13, 243–262.
13.
BernardH. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
14.
BoyteH. C. (2003). Civic education and the new American patriotism post-9/11.Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 85–100.
15.
BryskA. (Ed.). (2002). Globalization and human rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
BryskA., & ShafirG. (2004). People out of place: Globalization, human rights, and the citizenship gap. New York: Routledge.
17.
CarensJ. H. (2000). Culture, citizenship and community. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
CarnoyM. (2001). The demise of the nation-state?Theoria, 97, 69–81.
19.
CastlesS. (2000). Ethnicity and globalization: From migrant worker to transnational citizen. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CastlesS., & DavidsonA. (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalization and the politics of belonging. New York: Routledge.
21.
CornblethC. (2002). Images of America: What youth “do” know about the United States.American Educational Research Journal, 39, 519–552.
22.
CowanJ. K., DembourM., & WilsonR. A. (Eds.). (2001). Culture and rights: Anthropological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
CruzB. C. (1994). Stereotypes of Latin Americans perpetuated in secondary school history textbooks.Latino Studies Journal, 1, 51–67.
24.
DaviesI., EvansM., & ReidA. (2005). Globalising citizenship education? A critique of ‘global education’ and ‘citizenship education.’British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 66–89.
25.
della PortaD., AndrettaM., MoscaL., & ReiterH. (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
DonnellyJ. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
DowerN. (2002). Global citizenship: Yes or no? In DowerN. & WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Global citizenship: A critical introduction (pp. 30–40). New York: Routledge.
28.
DowerN., & WilliamsJ. (Eds.). (2002). Global citizenship: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
29.
DoyleM. W., & GardnerA.-M. (2003). Introduction: Human rights and international order. In CoicaudJ.-M., DoyleM. W., & GardnerA.-M. (Eds.), The globalization of human rights (pp. 1–19). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
30.
EisikovitsR. A. (2005). Perspectives of young immigrants from the former USSR on voting and politics in Israel.Theory and Research in Social Education, 33, 454–475.
31.
EpsteinT. (2000). Adolescents’ perspectives on racial diversity in U.S. history: Case studies from an urban classroom.American Educational Research Journal, 37, 185–214.
32.
FaistT. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. 23, 189–222.
33.
FoxJ. (2005). Unpacking “transnational citizenship.” Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 171–201.
34.
FryR. (2003). Hispanic youth dropping out of U.S. schools: Measuring the challenge. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
35.
GeeJ. P. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education.Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
36.
HahnC. L. (1998). Becoming political: Comparative perspectives on citizenship education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
HahnC. L. (1999). Challenges to civic education in the United States. In Torney-PurtaJ., SchwilleJ., & AmadeoJ.-A. (Eds.), Civic education across countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA civic education project (pp. 583–607). Amsterdam: IEA.
38.
HeldD. (2002). The transformation of political community: Rethinking democracy in the context of globalisation. In DowerN. & WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Global citizenship: a critical introduction (pp. 92–100). New York: Routledge.
39.
HeldD., & McGrewA. G. (Eds.). (2003). The global transformations reader: An introduction to the globalization debate. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
40.
HoederD., HébertY., & SchmittI. (Eds.). (2005). Negotiating transcultural lives: Belongings and social capital among youth in comparative perspective. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
41.
HowardS., & GillJ. (2001). “It's like we're a normal way and everyone else is different”: Australian children's constructions of citizenship and national identity.Educational Studies, 27, 87–103.
42.
HuckS. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research. Boston: Pearson.
43.
HuntingtonS. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44.
IchilovO. (Ed.). (1998). Citizenship and citizenship education in a changing world. London: Woburn Press.
45.
IgnatieffM. (Ed.). (2005). American exceptionalism and human rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
JohnstonP. (2003). Transnational citizenries: Reflections from the field in California.Citizenship Studies, 7, 199–217.
47.
Jones-CorreaM. (1998). Between two nations: The political predicament of Latinos in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
JunnJ. (2004). Diversity, immigration, and the politics of civic education.PS: Political Science and Politics, 37, 253–255.
49.
LawW.-W. (2004). Globalization and citizenship education in Hong Kong and Taiwan.Comparative Education Review, 48, 253–273.
50.
LincolnY., & GubaE. (2000). The only generalization is: There is no generalization. In GommR., HammersleyM., & FosterP. (Eds.), Case study method (pp. 110–128). London: Sage.
51.
ListerR., SmithN., MiddletonS., & CoxL. (2003). Young people talk about citizenship: Empirical perspectives on theoretical and political debates.Citizenship Studies, 7, 235–253.
52.
MasseyD. (1995). The new immigration and ethnicity in the United States.Population and Development Review, 21, 631–652.
53.
McConnellM. W. (2002). Don't neglect the little platoons. In NussbaumM. (Ed.), For love of country? (pp. 78–84). Boston: Beacon Press.
54.
McDonoughK., & FeinbergW. (2003). Education and citizenship in liberal-democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
MerryfieldM. (1998). Pedagogy for global perspectives in education: Studies of teachers’ thinking and practice.Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 342–379.
56.
MirelJ. (2002). Civic education and changing definitions of American identity, 1900–1950. Educational Review, 54, 143–152.
57.
MitchellK. (2001). Education for democratic citizenship: Transnationalism, multicultural-ism, and the limits of liberalism.Harvard Educational Review, 71, 51–78.
58.
MitchellK., & ParkerW. (2008). I pledge allegiance to … Flexible citizenship and shifting scales of belonging.Teachers College Record, 110(4), 775–804.
59.
MuetzelfeldtM., & SmithG. (2002). Civil society and global governance: The possibilities for global citizenship.Citizenship Studies, 6(1), 55–75.
60.
MutuaM. (2002). Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
61.
MyersJ. P. (2006). Rethinking the social studies curriculum in the context of globalization: Education for global citizenship in the U.S.Theory and Research in Social Education, 34, 370–394.
62.
NashM. A. (2005). “How to be thankful for being free”: Searching for a convergence of discourses on teaching patriotism, citizenship, and United States history.Teachers College Record, 107, 214–240.
63.
NussbaumM. C. (2002). Patriotism or cosmopolitanism.Boston Review, 19(5), 3–6.
64.
OldfatherP., WestJ., WhiteJ., & WilmarthJ. (1999). Learning through children's eyes: Social constructivism and the desire to learn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
OlmedoI. (2004). Raising transnational issues in a multicultural curriculum project.Urban Education, 39, 241–265.
66.
OngA. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
67.
OslerA., & StarkeyH. (2003). Learning for cosmopolitan citizenship: Theoretical debates and young people's experiences.Educational Review, 55, 243–254.
68.
ParkerW. C. (2004). Diversity, globalization, and democratic education: Curriculum possibilities. In BanksJ. A. (Ed.), Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives (pp. 433–458). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
PortesA., & RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70.
Ramos-ZayasA. Y. (1998). Nationalist ideologies, neighborhood-based activism, and educational spaces in Puerto Rican Chicago.Harvard Educational Review, 68, 164–192.
71.
RavitchD. (2002). September 11: Seven lessons for the schools.Educational Leadership, 60(2), 6–9.
72.
ReimersF. (2006). Citizenship, identity and education: Examining the public purposes of schools in an age of globalization.Prospects, 36, 275–294.
73.
RichardsonG. H., & BladesD. W. (Eds.). (2005). Troubling the canon of citizenship education. New York: Peter Lang.
SassenS. (2003b). The repositioning of citizenship: Emergent subjects and spaces for politics.CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 41–66.
76.
SassenS. (2004). Going beyond the national state in the USA: The politics of minoritized groups in global cities.Diogenes, 51(3), 59–65.
77.
SassenS. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
79.
ShulhaL. M., WilsonR. J., & AndersonJ. O. (1999). Investigating teachers’ assessment practices: Exploratory, non-foundationalist, mixed-method research.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 45, 304–313.
80.
SmithR. C. (2003). Diasporic memberships in historical perspective: Comparative insights from the Mexican, Italian and Polish cases.International Migration Review, 37, 724–759.
81.
SoysalY. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82.
SpringJ. (2004). How educational ideologies are shaping global society: Intergovernmental organizations, NGOs, and the decline of the nation-state. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
83.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
84.
StokesG. (2004). Transnational citizenship: Problems of definition, culture and democracy.Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17, 119–135.
85.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
Suárez-OrozcoC. (2004). Formulating identity in a globalized world. In Suárez-OrozcoM. M. & Qin-HilliardD. B. (Eds.), Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 173–202). Berkeley: University of California Press.
87.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2001). Children of immigrants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
SzelényiK., & RhoadesR. A. (2007). Citizenship in a global context: The perspectives of international graduate students in the United States.Comparative Education Review, 51, 25–47.
89.
TamirY. (1993). Liberal nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
TarrowS. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
91.
TeepleG. (2005). The riddle of human rights. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
92.
TillyC. (1998). Where do rights come from? In SkocpolT. (Ed.), Democracy, revolution and history (pp. 55–72). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
93.
TomlinsonJ. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
Torney-PurtaJ., LehmannR., OswaldH., & SchulzW. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.
95.
TorresC. A. (2002). Globalization, education, and citizenship: Solidarity versus markets?American Educational Research Journal, 39, 363–378.
96.
UrryJ. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge.
97.
WestheimerJ. (2007). Politics and patriotism in education. In WestheimerJ. (Ed.), Pledging allegiance: The politics of patriotism in America's schools (pp. 171–188). New York: Teachers College Press.
98.
WillinskyJ. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire's end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
99.
YinR. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
100.
YoungI. M. (2004). Modest reflections on hegemony and global democracy.Theoria, 103, 1–14.
101.
Yuval-DavisN. (1999). The “multi-layered citizen”: Citizenship in the age of globalization.International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1, 119–136.
