There has been little research on the relationship between mathematics and science coursework in secondary school.
Purpose of Study
The present analysis explored the patterns of science course-taking in relation to the patterns of mathematics course-taking among high school graduates.
Research Design
Using data from the 2000 High School Transcript Study (N = 20,368), secondary analysis was performed in the form of multilevel models with students nested within schools to document a strong relationship between mathematics and science course-work patterns.
Findings/Results
Results highlighted that (1) taking more courses in advanced mathematics was related to taking more courses in advanced science (this relationship remained strong even after adjustment for student-level and school-level variables); (2) the more courses that students took in advanced mathematics, the more likely it was that student and school characteristics would join in to select students into taking more courses in advanced science; (3) many high school graduates complied with graduation requirements by taking limited non-advanced mathematics and science coursework during high school; and (4) mathematics coursework was necessary but insufficient to promote advanced science coursework.
Conclusions/Recommendations
State governments are encouraged to prescribe not only the number but also the content of mathematics and science courses required for high school graduation. School personnel such as career counselors are encouraged to help promote better coursework of students in mathematics and science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and Bachelor's degree attainment.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AinsleyR. (1990). Bluff your way in math. Lincoln, NE: Centennial.
3.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BassonI. (2002). Physics and mathematics as interrelated fields of thought development using acceleration as an example.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33, 679–690.
5.
BeaneD. B. (1988). Mathematics and science: Critical filters for the future of minority students.Washington, DC: American University.
6.
BerlinD. F., & HillenJ. A. (1994). Making connections in math and science: Identifying student outcomes.School Science and Mathematics, 94, 283–290.
7.
BrykA., LeeV., & HollandP. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
College Entrance Examination Board. (2003). 2003 profile of college-bound seniors. New York: Author.
9.
CrisseyS. R., & WilkinsonL. (2005, March). The role of high school math and science course taking in the transition to first birth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, PA.
10.
FinnJ. D., GerberS. B., & WangM. C. (2002). Course offerings, course requirements, and course taking in mathematics.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17, 336–366.
11.
FrykholmJ. A., & MeyerM. R. (2002, May). Integrated instruction: Is it science? Is it mathematics?Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 502–508.
12.
HannaG., & JahnkeH. (2002). Arguments from physics in mathematical proofs: An educational perspective.For the Learning of Mathematics, 22 (3), 38–45.
13.
HeflichD. A., DixonJ. K., & DavisK. S. (2001). Taking it to the field: The authentic integration of mathematics and technology in inquiry-based science instruction.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20, 99–112.
14.
HofferT. B. (1997). High school graduation requirements: Effects on dropping out and student achievement.Teachers College Record, 98, 584–607.
15.
HuntT. C., JosephE. A., & NuzziR. J. (Eds.). (2004). Catholic schools still make a difference: Ten years of research, 1991–2000. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
16.
LeeV. E., CroningerR. G., & SmithJ. B. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 99–121.
17.
LedermanN. G., & NiessM. L. (1998). 5 apples + 4 oranges = ?School Science and Mathematics, 98, 281–284.
18.
LehrerR., & SchaubleL. (2002). Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constituting inscription and thought. In AmselE. & ByrnesJ. P. (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The development and consequences of symbolic communication (pp. 167–192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
MaX. (2000). A longitudinal assessment of antecedent coursework in mathematics on subsequent mathematical attainment.Journal of Educational Research, 94, 16–28.
20.
McBrideJ. W., & SilvermanF. L. (1991). Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics.School Science and Mathematics, 91, 285–292.
21.
MeierS. L. (1998). TIMSS and IMaST students: How do they fare?CeMaST Update, 3 (1).
22.
MeierS. L., CobbsG., & NicolM. (1998). Potential benefits and barriers to integration.School Science and Mathematics, 98, 438–447.
23.
MeltzerD. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores.American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259–1268.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). The condition of education 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The 2000 High School Transcript Study user's guide and technical report. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
28.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
29.
National Research Council. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31.
National Science Teachers Association. (1992). NSTA standards for science teacher preparation: Final draft.Reston, VA: Author.
32.
OakesJ. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
33.
OrtonT., & RoperT. (2000). Science and mathematics: A relationship in need of counseling? Studies in Science Education, 35, 123–154.
34.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
RaudenbushS. W., BrykA. S., CheongY. F., & CongdonR. (2000). HLM5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
36.
SebringP. A. (1987). Consequences of differential amounts of high school coursework: Will the new graduation requirements help?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 258–273.
37.
SellsL. W. (1973). High school mathematics as the critical filter in the job market.Proceedings of the Conference on Minority Graduate Education.Berkeley: University of California.
38.
SheetyA. S. (2002). How do teachers who teach different subject matter think how their students learn? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
39.
SmithJ. B. (1996). Does an extra year make any difference? The impact of early access to algebra on long-term gains in mathematics attainment.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 141–153.
40.
StevensonD. L., SchillerK. S., & SchneiderB. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning.Sociology of Education, 67, 184–198
41.
UnderhillR. G., AbdiS. W., & PetersP. F. (1994). The Virginia State Systemic Initiative: A brief overview of the lead teacher component and a description of the evolving mathematics and science integration outcomes.School Science and Mathematics, 94, 26–29.
