Making Retention Count: The Power of Becoming a Peer Tutor

Abstract

Background/Context

A review of the literature demonstrates that grade retention often fails to improve the academic and socioemotional outcomes of retained students. Although little empirical work on peer tutoring has focused specifically on retained students, the literature suggests that those students who act as peer tutors often experience improved school performance and self-concepts.

Purpose of Study

This work developed out of a concern that elementary school students being held back to repeat a grade, or retained, were not benefiting academically from non-promotion. The purpose of this action research study was to identify and implement an intervention that would improve the academic and socioemotional outcomes of a twice-retained third-grade student.

Setting

This study took place in a New York City public elementary school.

Intervention

The intervention involved implementing a 12-week peer tutoring program in which a retained third-grade student tutored a struggling classmate in mathematics.

Research Design

This is an action research study in which the author conducted research and implemented an intervention in her own classroom.

Results

After serving as a peer tutor, this student experienced increased math achievement, an improved self-concept, and better classroom behavior. These results suggest that having struggling students serve as peer tutors may be effective in improving both their academic achievement and socioemotional outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

, Entwisle

, & Dauber

(1994). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Allensworth

(2004). Ending social promotion in Chicago: Drop out rates in Chicago after implementation of the eighth-grade gate. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Anderson

G. E.

, Jimerson

S. R.

, & Whipple

A. D.

(2005). Students’ ratings of stressful experiences at home and school: Loss of a parent and grade retention as superlative stressors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21, 1–20.

Bernard

(1990). The case for peers. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Cohen

P. A.

, Kulik

J. A.

, & Kulik

C. L.

(1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.

Fuchs

L. S.

, Fuchs

, Bentz

, Phillips

N. B.

, & Hamlett

C. L.

(1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 75–103.

Ginsburg-Block

M. D.

, Rohrbeck

C. A

, & Fantuzzo

J. W.

(2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749.

Greene

, & Winters

(2006, Spring). Getting ahead by staying behind. Education Next, 65–69.

Greenwood

C. R.

, Delquadri

J. C.

, & Hall

R. V.

(1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383.

10.

Greenwood

C. R.

, & Terry

(1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22, 497–517.

11.

Hedin

(1987). Students as teachers: A tool for improving school climate and productivity. Social Policy, 17 (3), 42–47.

12.

Herszenhorn

(2004a, January 9). Stricter standards in New York may hold 15,000 in 3rd grade. New York Times. Retrieved April 8, 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com

13.

Herszenhorn

(2004b, January 14). Special help for 3rd graders is promised. New York Times. Retrieved April 8, 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com

14.

Holmes

C. T.

, & Matthews

K. M.

(1984). The effects of non-promotion on elementary and junior high pupils: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 54, 225–236.

15.

Jimerson

S. R.

(2001a). A synthesis of grade retention research: Looking backward and moving forward. The California School Psychologist, 6, 47–59.

16.

Jimerson

S. R.

(2001b). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420–347.

17.

Jimerson

, Anderson

G. E.

, & Whipple

A. D.

(2002). Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 441–457.

18.

Maslow

A. H.

(1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

19.

Mills

, Dunham

R. G.

, & Alpert

G. P.

(1988). Working with high-risk youth in prevention and early intervention programs: Toward a comprehensive wellness model. Adolescence, 23 (91), 643–660.

20.

New York City Department of Education. (n.d.). Assessment and accountability. Retrieved July 26, 2007, from http://schools.nyc.gov/daa/test_info/default.asp#NYSMATH

21.

Roderick

, & Nagaoka

(2005). Retention under Chicago's high-stakes testing program: Helpful, harmful, or harmless? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 27, 309–340.

22.

Nazzal

(2002). Peer tutoring and at-risk students: An exploratory study. Action in Teacher Education, 24 (1), 68–80.

23.

Reckrut

M. D.

(1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. Journal of Reading, 37, 356–362.

24.

Robinson

D. R.

, Schofield

J. W.

, & Steers-Wentzell

K. L

(2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review 17, 327–362.

25.

Roderick

(1995). Grade retention and school dropout: Policy debate and research questions. Phi Delta Kappan Research Bulletin, 15, 1–6.

26.

Roderick

, & Nagaoka

(2005). Retention under Chicago's high-stakes testing program: Helpful, harmful, or harmless? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 309–340.

27.

Rohrbeck

C. A.

, Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo

J. W.

, & Miller

T. R.

(2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257.

28.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.