Constructing a Discourse of Inquiry: Findings from a Five-Year Ethnography at One Elementary School

Abstract

Background/Context

In an age of test-driven accountability, many schools are returning to banking pedagogies in which students passively take in content. Inquiry-based instruction offers one approach for actively involving students in meaningful learning activity, however, research on inquiry pedagogies often focuses on academic accomplishments. Our study examines how inquiry-based dialogue not only supports academic learning but also supports social learning as students and teachers negotiate, share ideas, collaborate, and problem-solve together.

Purpose

This longitudinal study builds on conceptualizations of dialogic inquiry to examine how teachers and students coconstructed a discourse of inquiry in a public magnet school. We examine the processes and practices that make up this discourse of inquiry and study the function of teacher talk in supporting academic and social learning and agency among students.

Setting

The Center for Inquiry is a public magnet elementary school located in an ethnically diverse suburban community that was formed in partnership with the University of South Carolina.

Participants

Participants included teachers and 135 students (65% European American, 30% African American) studied during a 5-year period.

Research Design

The two authors worked collaboratively with school members to collect two related ethnographic data sets. Data Set 1 captured classroom practices across all six classrooms, and Data Set 2 followed one cohort during the same 5-year period.

Findings

Findings are presented in two sections. The first section presents a discourse of inquiry made up of six interacting practices of inquiry constructed by teachers and students across classrooms. This discourse of inquiry integrates academic and social practices that position inquiry as (1) dynamic and dialogic, (2) attentive, probing, and thoughtful, (3) agentive and socially responsible, (4) relational and compassionate, (5) reflective and reflexive, and (6) valuing multiple and interdisciplinary perspectives. The second section makes visible how these practices of inquiry were coconstructed through transcripts of classroom discourse drawn from both data sets that centered on discussions of life science.

Conclusions/Recommendations

This discourse of inquiry supports students as active, thoughtful, engaged learners and community members and underscores the critical role of classroom talk, collaboration, and deliberation in meaningful learning engagements. Although teachers and students alike took multiple roles and responsibilities through inquiry, the teacher's discourse was critical in supporting and extending student learning. We recommend professional development opportunities that equip preservice and in-service teachers with resources, skills, and dispositions to become active inquirers of their own classroom and school practices and who recognize the power of classroom talk to shape and limit possibilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloome

, & Bailey

(1992). From linguistics and education, a direction for research on language and literacy. In Beach

, Green

J. L.

, Kamil

M. L.

, & Shanahan

(Eds.), Multiple disciplinary perspectives on language and literacy research (pp. 191–210). Urbana, IL: NCRE & NCTE.

Bloome

, Carter

S. P.

, Christian

B. M.

, Otto

, & Shuart-Faris

(2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Castanheira

M. L.

, Crawford

, Green

, & Dixon

, (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11 (4), 353–400.

Copenhaver-Johnson

J. F.

, Bowman

J. T.

, & Johnson

A. C.

(2007). Santa stories: Children's inquiry about race during picturebook read-alouds. Language Arts, 84 (3), 234–244.

Crawford

, Kelly

G. J.

, & Brown

(2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (3), 237–258.

Darling-Hammond

(1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dewey

(1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

Dewey

(1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

Donnelly

, Morgan

, DeFord

, Long

, Mills

, & Stephens

(2005). Transformative professional development: Negotiating knowledge within an inquiry stance. Language Arts, 82 (5), 336–346.

10.

Edwards

, & Mercer

(1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Methuen.

11.

Edelsky

(1996). With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.

12.

Egawa

, & Harste

(2001). Balancing the literacy curriculum: A new vision. School Talk, 7 (1), 2–5.

13.

Freire

(1995). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press. (Original work published 1970)

14.

Freire

(1998). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum Press. (Original work published 1969)

15.

Freire

, & Betto

(1985). Essa escola chamada vida [This school called life]. São Paulo, Brazil.

16.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Glaser

B. G.

, & Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

18.

Greene

(1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teacher's College Press.

19.

Halliday

(1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.

20.

Harwayne

(1999). Going public: Priorities and practice at the Manhattan New School. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

21.

Heap

J. L.

(1992). Seeing snubs: An introduction to sequential analysis of classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 23–28.

22.

Jennings

L. B.

(2001). Inquiry for professional development and continuous school renewal. In Mills

& Donnelly

(Eds.), From the ground up: Creating a culture of inquiry (pp. pp. 33–54). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

23.

Jennings

L. B.

(with O'Keefe

). (2002). Parents, children, and teachers inquiring together: Written conversations about social justice. Language Arts, 79, 404–414.

24.

Jennings

L. B.

, & Green

J. L.

(1999). Locating democratizing and transformative practices within classroom discourse. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 34 (2), i–iv.

25.

Jennings

L. B.

, O'Keefe

, & Shamlin

(1999). Creating spaces for dialogue: Democratic classroom practices in first and second grade. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 34 (2), 1–16.

26.

Jennings

L. B.

, & Smith

(2002). Examining the role of critical inquiry for transformative practices: Two joint case studies of multicultural teacher education. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 456–481.

27.

Johnston

P. H.

(2004). Choice words: How our language affects children's learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

28.

Kelly

G. J.

, & Crawford

(1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81 (5), 533–559.

29.

Lemke

J. L.

(1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

30.

Lindfors

(1999). Children's inquiry: Using language to make sense of the world. New York: Teachers College Press.

31.

McAlister

, & Irvine

J. J.

(2000). Cultural competency and multicultural teacher education. Review of Educational Research, 70 (1), 3–24.

32.

Mehan

(1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Meier

(1995). The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.

34.

Mills

(with Jennings

L. B.

, Donnelly

, & Mueller

). (2001). When teachers have time to talk: The value of curricular conversations. Language Arts, 9 (1), 20–28.

35.

Mills

, & Clyde

J. A.

(Eds.). (1990). Portraits of whole language classrooms: Learning for all ages. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

36.

Mills

, & Donnelly

(Eds.). (2001). From the ground up: Creating a culture of inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

37.

Mills

, O'Keefe

, & Jennings

L. B.

(2004). Looking closely and listening carefully: Learning literacy through inquiry. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

38.

Mills

, O'Keefe

, & Whitin

(1996). Mathematics in the making. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

39.

Mills

, & Stephens

(with O'Keefe

, & Waugh

). (2004). Theory in practice: The legacy of Louise Rosenblatt. Language Arts, 82 (1), 47–55.

40.

Mitchell

J. C.

(1984). Case studies. In Ellen

R. F.

(Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

41.

Nassaji

, & Wells

(2000). What's the use of “triadic dialogue”? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 376–406

42.

Noddings

(1992). The challenge to care in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

43.

Noddings

(2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

44.

Peterson

, & Eeds

(1990). Grand conversations: Literature groups in action. New York: Scholastic.

45.

Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group. (1993). Linguistics in Education: An International Research Journal [Special Issue] 4 (3–4).

46.

Shannon

(1993). Developing democratic voices. The Reading Teacher, 47 (2), 86–94.

47.

Shor

(1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

48.

Short

, & Burke

(2001). Creating curriculum: Teachers and students as a community of learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

49.

Short

, Harste

, & Burke

(1996). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

50.

Tchudi

(Ed.). (1993). The astonishing curriculum: Integrating science and humanities through language. Urbana, IL: National Council for Teachers of English.

51.

Tuyay

, Jennings

, & Dixon

(1995). Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 19 (1), 75–110.

52.

Tuyay

, Yeager

, Floriani

, Dixon

, & Green

(1995). Constructing an integrated, inquiry-oriented approach in classrooms: A cross case analysis of social, literate, and academic practice. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30 (2), 1–15.

53.

Vasquez

V. M.

(2005). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

54.

Wells

(1995). Leading grand conversations. In Roser

N. L.

& Martinez

M. G.

(Eds.), Book talk and beyond: Children and teachers respond to literature (pp. 132–139). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

55.

Wells

(1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

56.

Whitin

P. E.

, & Whitin

(1997). Inquiry at the window. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

57.

Wilson

S. M.

, & Berne

(1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of the research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.