Children of Turkish Immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands: The Impact of Differences in Vocational and Academic Tracking Systems

Abstract

Background/Context

Much research is being done on Turkish immigrants and their children in Germany and the Netherlands, but almost always from a national perspective. To compare the situation, for example, regarding educational outcomes across the two countries has proved to be very difficult because of different sets, selection criteria, and time periods for statistical data on immigrant populations. However, those data, which are actually available and comparable to at least some degree, already show how strongly the differences in educational attainment and labor market integration of Turkish immigrants depend on structural and systemic differences in the ways that education is organized in Germany and the Netherlands.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

The article analyzes available data on young Turkish immigrants and native-born second generations and their educational success in the two countries with the major Turkish populations in Western Europe. It aims to direct the focus away from group background characteristics, which are actually quite similar, to the influence of institutional arrangements and the way that the educational system facilitates (or not) the educational integration of Turkish youth.

Research Design

The article is based on publicly collected and available data on the Turkish populations in Germany and the Netherlands. This mainly refers to the Dutch SPVA surveys and the German micro-census and Integration Survey.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The findings show that more than group characteristics, systemic and institutional factors can have a decisive role in promoting or hampering the educational and labor market integration of young immigrants and the native-born second generation. The greater openness of the Dutch school system to provide “long routes” and “second chances” shows its effect in significantly higher shares of Turks in higher education. On the other side, the dual system of vocational training in Germany seems to be better suited for labor market integration, especially because apprenticeships are more practice oriented and do count as work experience for later application procedures. The Dutch system also offers better opportunities for girls than does the German system. Yet, the polarization effect between “high achievement” and “failure” of only partial integration success is greater in the Netherlands, whereas the overall advancement is slower, but also less polarizing, in Germany. In this sense, each country could learn something from its neighbor regarding those aspects of the institutional and systemic setting that apparently fail to do the job well enough.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alba

(2003, June) Blurred vs. bright boundaries: Second generation assimilation and exclusion in comparative perspective. Paper presented at the Bellagio Conference on the Second Generation, Bellagio, Italy.

Alders

(2001). Allochtone moeders [Migrant mothers]. In Garssen

, de Beer

, Cuyvers

, & de Jong

(Eds.), Samenleven. Nieuwe feiten over relaties en gezinnen (pp. 107–121). Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands.

Alders

, Harmsen

, & Hooghiemstra

(2001). Relatievorming van allochtonen [Entering of relations by migrants]. In Garssen

, de Beer

, Cuyvers

, & de Jong

(Eds.), Samenleven. Nieuwe feiten over relaties en gezinnen (pp. 43–53). Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands.

von Below

(2003). Schulische Bildung, berufliche Ausbildung und Erwerbstätigkeit junger Migranten. Ergebnissen des Integrationssurveys des BiB [School education, vocational training, and employment of young migrants: Results from the Integration Survey of the Federal Institute for Education Research]. Wiesbaden, Germany: BiB. (Heft 105b).

Böcker

, & Thränhardt

(2003). Is het Duitse integratiebeleid succesvoller, en zo ja, waarom? [Is the German integration policy more successful, and if so, why?]. Migrantenstudies, 19 (1), 33? 44.

Boos-Nünning

, & Karakaflo lu

(2005). Viele Welten leben. Zur Lebenssituation von Mädchen und jungen Frauen mit Migrationshintergrund [Living in many worlds: On the life situation of girls and young women with migration backgrounds]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

Bos

, Lankes

E. M.

, Prenzel

, Schwippert

, Walther

, & Valtin

(Eds.). (2003). Erste Ergebnisse aus IGLU. Schülerleistungen am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe im interna-tionalen Vergleich [First results from IGLU: Pupils’ attainment at the end of fourth grade in international comparison]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

Brubaker

W. R.

(1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Castles

, & Miller

M. J.

(1993). The Age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. London: Macmillan.

10.

Coenen

(2001). Word niet zoals wij: de veranderende betekenis van onderwijs bij Turkse gezinnen in Nederland [Do not become like us: The changing meaning of education in Turkish families in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam:

Het Spinhuis.

11.

Crul

(1994) Springen over je eigen schaduw. De onderwijsprestaties van Marokkanen en Turken van de tweede generatie [Jumping over your own shadow: The educational performances of second-generation Moroccans and Turks]. Migrantenstudies 10 (3), 168–186.

12.

Crul

(2000). De sleutel tot succes. Over hulp, keuzes en kansen in de schoolloopbanen van Turkse en Marokkaanse jongeren van de tweede generatie [The key to success: On support, choices, and chances in the school careers of Turkish and Moroccan youth of the second generation]. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

13.

Crul

, & Doomernik

(2003). The Turkish and the Moroccan second generation in the Netherlands: Divergent trends between and polarization within the two groups. International Migration Review, 37, 1039–1065.

14.

Crul

, & Vermeulen

(2003). The second generation in Europe: Introduction. International Migration Review, 37, 965–986.

15.

Doomernik

(1998) The effectiveness of integration policies towards immigrants and their descendants in France, Germany and the Netherlands. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.

16.

Eldering

, & Kloprogge

(1989). Different cultures same school: Ethnic minority children in Europe. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

17.

Faist

(1995). Social citizenship for whom? Young Turks in Germany and Mexican-Americans in the United States. Aldershot, England: Avebury.

18.

Fase

(1994) Ethnic divisions in Western European education. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

19.

Gijsberts

(2004). De onderwijspositie van vrouwen uit etnische minderheden [The educational position of women from ethnic minorities]. In Gijsberts

& Merens

(Eds.), Emancipatie in estafette. De positie van vrouwen uit etnische minderheden (pp. 31–58). Rijswijk, Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

20.

Heckmann

, Lederer

H. W.

, & Worbs

(in cooperation with the EFFNATIS research team). (2001). Effectiveness of national integration strategies towards second generation migrant youth in a comparative European perspective: Final report to the European Commission, Bamberg, Germany.

21.

Herweijer

(2003) Voortgezet onderwijs, beroepsonderwijs en hoger onderwijs [Secondary education, vocational training, and tertiary education]. In Dagevos

, Gijsberts

, & Praag

C.v.

(Eds.), Rapportage Minderheden. Onderwijs, arbeid en sociaal-cul-turele integratie (pp. 111–142). Rijswijk, Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

22.

Hooghiemstra

, & Merens

(1999). Variatie in particpatie. Achtergronden van arbeidsdeelname van allochtone en autochtone vrouwen. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

23.

Jennissens

, & Hartgens

(2006). Allochtonen in het onderwijs [Migrants in education]. In Integratiekaart 2006 (pp. 11–24). The Hague: Netherlands: WODC.

24.

Joppke

(1999) Immigration and the nation-state: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

25.

Karpat

(1995) The Turks in America. In de Tapia

(Ed.), Turcs d'Europe…et d'ailleurs (pp. 612–638). Paris: ERISM.

26.

Kasinitz

, Mollenkopf

, & Waters

(2002). Becoming American: Becoming New Yorkers: Immigrant incorporation in a majority minority city. International Migration Review, 36, 1020–1036.

27.

Kelek

(2005). Die fremde Braut. Bericht aus dem Inneren des türkischen Lebens in Deutschland [The strange bride: Report from the interior of Turkish life in Germany]. Köln, Germany: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

28.

Konsortium Bildungsberichterstattung. (2006). Bildung in Deutschland. Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Bildung und Migration [Education in Germany: An indicator-based report with an analysis of education and migration]. Bielefeld, Germany: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.

29.

Koopmans

(2003). Zachte heelmeesters… Een vergelijking van de resultaten van het Nederlandse en Duitse integratiebeleid en wat de WRR daaruit niet concludeert [Desperate diseases need…: A comparison of the results of Dutch and German integration policies and what the WRR does not conclude from this]. Migrantenstudies, 37 (1), 87–92.

30.

Kornmann

, & Kornmann

(2003). Erneuter Anstieg der überrepräsentation ausländischer Kinder in Schulen für Lernbehinderte [Again an increase in the overrepresentation of foreign children in schools for learning disabilities]. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 7, 286–289.

31.

Lindo

(2000). The silent success: The social advancement of Southern European labour migrants in the Netherlands. In Vermeulen

& Penninx

(Eds.), Immigrant integration: The Dutch case (pp. 132–152). Amsterdam:

Het Spinhuis.

32.

Mahnig

(1998). Integrationspolitik in Großebritannien, Frankreich, Deutschland und den Niederlanden. Eine vergleichende Analyse [Integration policies in Great Britain, France, Germany, and the Netherlands: A comparative analysis]. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Swiss Forum for Migration and Population Studies.

33.

Mollenkopf

(1999). Assimilating immigrants in Amsterdam: A perspective from New York. Netherlands Journal of Social Science, 36, 126–145.

34.

Muus

(2003) An international comparison of migration and Immigrant policy with respect to immigrants from Turkey and their participation in the labour market. In Haagendoorn

, Veenman

, & Vollenbergh

(Eds.), Integrating immigrants in the Netherlands: Cultural versus Socio-economic Integration (pp. 17–40). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

35.

Özüekren

A. S.

, & van Kempen

(1997). Turks in European cities: Housing and urban segregation. Utrecht, Netherlands: ERCOMER.

36.

Pels

(2001, November). Student disengagement and pedagogical climate. Paper presented at the sixth International Metropolis Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

37.

Portes

(1996). The new second generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

38.

Portes

, & Rumbaut

(1996). Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.

39.

Portes

, & Rumbaut

(2001). Legacies. The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley:

University of California Press.

40.

Portes

, & De Wind

(2004). A cross-Atlantic dialogue: The progress of research and theory in the study of international migration. International Migration Review, 38, 828–851.

41.

Read

J. G.

(2004). Cultural influences on immigrant women's labor force participation: The Arab-American case. International Migration Review, 38, 52–77.

42.

Reitz

(1998). The warmth of welcome: The social causes of economic success for immigrants in different nations and cities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

43.

Reitz

(2002). Host societies and the reception of immigrants: Institutions, markets and policies. New York: Center of Migration Studies of New York.

44.

Tesser

, Merens

, & van Praag

(1999). Rapportage minderheden 1999 [Report on minorities 1999]. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

45.

Vermeulen

(2004). Models and modes of immigrant integration … and where does Southern Europe fit? In Inglessi

, Lyberaki

, & Vermeulen

(Eds.), Immigration and integration in Northern versus Southern Europe (pp. 27–39). Athens, Greece: Netherlands Institute at Athens.

46.

de Vries

(1990). Roddel nader beschouwd [A closer view on gossip]. Leiden, Netherlands: COMT.

47.

Waldinger

(2001). Strangers at the gates: New immigrants in urban America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

48.

Werner

(1994). Integration of foreign workers into the labour market: France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.

49.

Worbs

(2003). The second generation in Germany: Between school and labor market. International Migration Review, 37, 1011–1038.