Although teachers’ core instructional beliefs are difficult to accurately measure, they provide a framework for understanding the thinking that underlies important curricular and pedagogical decisions made in the classroom. Previous research has primarily used self-report to study teacher beliefs, but self-report is better for reporting explicit cognitions rather than implicit ones, such as beliefs.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
The purpose of our study was to investigate teacher talk during shared planning time to provide insight into the rationales behind teachers’ decision making that may be related to their underlying beliefs about subject matter, teaching, learning, and their students.
Setting
Xavier Middle School is located in a suburban area of a midsized progressive city in Florida and has a teacher-student ratio of about 1:19. It serves sixth- through eighth graders, and 28% of the student population are minority students.
Population/Participants/Subjects
A team of 4 eighth-grade mathematics teachers at a suburban middle school in the southern part of the United States agreed to participate in this study.
Research Design
A qualitative case study of eighth-grade mathematics teachers’ discourse was conducted during their weekly shared planning time during the course of one semester.
Data Collection and Analysis
A tape recorder and field notes were used to record the team's lesson planning discourse. After reviewing the written field notes, scenes of rich dialogue from the audiotapes were selected to be transcribed. Data from the transcripts were coded and assigned to relevant domains based on semantic relationships.
Findings/Results
We compiled all the domains related to teachers’ rationales or teachers’ thinking about learning and instruction and organized the data in a taxonomy supported by relevant examples from the transcripts. We found that these rationales and cognitions mapped onto six categories consisting of beliefs about pedagogical content, general pedagogy, subject matter, curricular choices, resources/textbooks, and students’ thinking. A consistent theme was found that reflected underlying beliefs in a traditional transmission model of instruction and learning.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study supported our hypothesis that teachers’ collaborative planning time discourse provides a unique lens for understanding teachers’ beliefs. Furthermore, teachers’ planning time provided a forum for teachers to display the rationales underlying their decision making, rationales that are usually hidden from view, especially from the view of a researcher. Teachers’ normally hidden planning process was thus rendered visible, and hence open to investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvidrezJ., & WeinsteinR. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 731—746.
2.
AmbroseR. (2004). Initiating change in prospective elementary school teachers’ orientations to mathematics teaching by building on beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 91—119.
3.
AndersonL. M., & Holt-ReynoldsD. (1995). Prospective teachers’ beliefs and teacher education pedagogy: Research based on a teacher educator's practical theory. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED392792)
4.
BarghJ. A., & FergusonM. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925—945.
5.
BaronJ. (1985). Rationality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BooteD. N., & GillM. G. (2007, April). School culture, mathematics culture, and the failures of reform: The need for a social view of culture. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
7.
BorkoH., & PutnamR. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673—708). New York: Macmillan.
ButlerR. (2000). Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating interferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 965—978.
10.
CalderheadJ. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709—725). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
11.
CassidyD. J., & LawrenceJ. M. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs: The “whys” behind the “how tos” in child care classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 193—204.
12.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 195, 2—14.
13.
ClarkC. M., & PetersonP. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255—296). New York: Macmillan.
14.
CohenD. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311—329.
15.
DoleJ. A., & SinatraG. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109—128.
16.
EpsteinS., & PaciniR. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In ChaikenS., & TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462—482). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
ErnestP. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In ErnestP. (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249—254). New York: Falmer Press.
18.
EvertsonC., & WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook for classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
FeldonD. F. (2007). Cognitive load and classroom teaching: The double-edged sword of automaticity. Educational Psychologist, 42, 123—137.
20.
FenstermacherG. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3—56.
21.
FenstermacherG. D., & RichardsonV. (1994). Promoting confusion in educational psychology: How is it done?Educational Psychologist, 29, 49—55.
22.
FowlerF. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.
23.
GeorgeP. S., & AlexanderW. M. (1993). The exemplary middle school (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
24.
GillM. G.AshtonP. T., & AlginaJ. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemologi-cal beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 164—185.
GoveM. K. (1983). Clarifying teachers’ beliefs about reading. The Reading Teacher, 37, 261—268.
27.
GrayC. L. (2001). The effect of general rationale statements on teacher acceptance of a classroom intervention: Investigating matched, mismatched and no-rationale options. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
28.
GreenT. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
GregoireM. (1999, April). Paradoxes and paradigms in an eighth grade pre-algebra class: A case study of a “good” math teacher. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
30.
GregoireM. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147—179.
31.
HenryJ. J., & ClementsD. H. (1999). Challenges for teachers attempting to integrate a mathematics innovation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 240—260.
32.
HiebertJ. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 3—19.
33.
HiebertJ., & StiglerJ. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons learned from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3—20.
34.
Holt-ReynoldsD. (1995). Preservice teachers and coursework: When is getting it right wrong? In O'HairM. J., & OdellS. J. (Eds.), Educating teachers for leadership and change: Teacher Education Yearbook III (pp.117—137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
HoyA. W.DavisH., & PapeS. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In AlexanderP. A., & WinneP. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715—737). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
JonassenD. H. (2002). Learning as activity. Educational Technology, 422, 45—51.
37.
KaganD. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419—469.
38.
KaganD. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65—90.
39.
KaneR.SandrettoS., & HeathC. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72, 177—228.
40.
KinchinI. M. (2002). Why professional development should challenge teachers’ core beliefs. School Science Review, 84306, 77—82.
41.
LarsonA., & SilvermanS. J. (2005). Rationales and practices used by caring physical education teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 10, 175—193.
42.
MunbyT.RussellT., & MartinA. K. (2001). Teacher's knowledge and how it develops. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877—904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
43.
NesporJ. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317—328.
44.
NisbettR. E., & WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231—259.
45.
NuthallG. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107, 895—934.
46.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307—332.
47.
PetersonP. L.FennemaE.CarpenterT., & LoefM. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1—40.
48.
PhillipsD. C., & BarbulesN. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
49.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102—119). New York: Simon and Schuster.
50.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.StormM. D.SawyerB. E.PiantaR. C., & LaParoK. M. (2006). The teacher belief Q-sort: A measure of teachers’ priorities in relation to disciplinary practices, teaching practices, and beliefs about children. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 141—165.
51.
RossJ. A.McDougallD., & Hogaboam-GrayA. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993–2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48, 122—138.
52.
ShavelsonR. J., & SternP. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455—498.
53.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3—36). New York: Macmillan.
54.
SmithE. R. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108—131.
55.
SmithE. R., & DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108—131.
56.
SoutherlandS. A.SinatraG. M., & MatthewsM. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325—351.
57.
SowderJ. T.PhilippR. A.ArmstrongB. E., & SchappelleB. P. (1998). Middle-grade teachers’ mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction: A research monograph. Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
SpeerN. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361—391.
59.
SpradleyJ. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Reinhart.
60.
StaubF. C., & SternE. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 344—355.
61.
StiglerJ. W., & HiebertJ. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
62.
StiglerJ. W., & PerryM. (1990). Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms. In StiglerJ. W.ShwederR. A., & HerdtG. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 328—353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SwanM. (2000). GCSE mathematics in further education: Challenging beliefs and practices. The Curriculum Journal, 11, 199—223.
64.
SztajnP. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53—75.
65.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyA. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783—805.
66.
WebbE.CampbellD.SchwartzR., & SechrestL. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
67.
WeberJ., & GillespieJ. (2001). Differences in ethical beliefs, intentions, and behaviors: The role of beliefs and intentions in ethics research revisited. Business Society, 37, 447—467.
68.
WellmanH. M., & GelmanS. A. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337—375.
69.
Wilcox-HerzogA. (2001). Is there a link between teacher's beliefs and behaviors: Early Education and Development, 13, 81—106.
70.
WinneP. H.Jamieson-NoelD., & MuisK. R. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In PintrichP. R., & MaehrM. L. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (pp. 121—156). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
