Bridges to Success in High School for Migrant Youth

Abstract

Background/Context

Among the children of immigrants, one of the populations placed at greatest risk of not finishing high school are the children of migrant farmworkers. Although it is difficult to track graduation rates for migrant students because of their mobility, the U.S. Department of Education estimates that only half of all migrant children finish high school. These children face many of the same obstacles as children of immigrants whose families must cope with severe economic hardships, but they also must deal with additional challenges associated with their families’ migratory lifestyles and living situations.

Purpose

This article offers some background on the barriers that migrant youth face in school; describes the services provided to these young people by the federally funded Migrant Education Program, focusing on the authors’ research on the role of migrant education resource teachers; and discusses the implications of study findings and related research for improving educational opportunities for low-income children of immigrants.

Research Design

Findings are drawn from 4 years of ethnographic research in one Northern California high school, where 80% of the Mexican-descent migrant students in the Class of 2002 completed 12th grade, and from a set of comparative interviews carried out with migrant education resource teachers in four additional high schools. The analysis centers on the nature of the relationships that develop between migrant students and migrant teachers, including the teachers’ multiple roles as mentors, counselors, advocates, and role models, and on the kinds of support provided to students that help them navigate successfully through high school.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Study findings suggest that the migrant students’ school persistence and academic success were due at least in part to the supplemental services they received from the Migrant Education Program and, in particular, to the support provided to them by the migrant resource teachers. A key to the teachers’ effectiveness was the holistic nature of their relationships with students and their ability to connect students with the resources and networks needed for school success. In addition, the migrant teachers’ own identities as academically successful Mexican Americans, many of them the children of migrant farmworkers, increased their ability to serve as role models and to help students build bridges between their multiple worlds. Findings support many of those reported in the literature on successful college outreach programs. Unlike these programs, the Migrant Education Program is not selective; it serves all eligible students.

Sometimes you're a teacher, sometimes you're a counselor, sometimes you're a social worker, sometimes you're a health consultant. It's so rewarding and the beauty of this job. — Migrant education resource teacher

They are like the symbol that you can do it, too. When I see them, I think: “They did it. Why can't I do it?” — Migrant student

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bourdieu

, & Passeron

J. C.

(1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Bowles

, & Gintis

(1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

Branz-Spall

A. M.

, & Rosenthal

(with Wright, A.). (2003). Children of the road: Migrant students, our nation's most mobile population. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 55—62.

California Department of Education. (2005). Overview of migrant education in California. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/me/mt/overview.asp

California Department of Education. (2006). Overview of migrant education in California. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/me/mt/overview.asp

Carter

P. L.

(2005). Keepin’ it real: School success beyond black and white. New York: Oxford University Press.

Chaskin

R. J.

, & Rauner

D. M.

(Eds.). (1995). Youth and caring. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 665—718.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 9, S95—S120.

Cooper

C. R.

2002. Five bridges along students’ pathways to college: A developmental blueprint of families, teachers, counselors, mentors, and peers in the Puente Project. Educational Policy, 16, 607—622.

10.

Dika

S. L.

, & Singh

(2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31—60.

11.

Duncan-Andrade

J. M. R.

(2006). Utilizing cariño in the development of research methodologies. In Kincheloe

Anderson

Rose

Griffith

, & Hayes

(Eds.), Urban education: An encyclopedia (pp. 451—486). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

12.

Erickson

(1987). Transformation and school success: The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 335—356.

13.

Ferguson

R. F.

(2002, November). What doesn't meet the eye: Understanding and addressing racial disparities in high-achieving suburban schools. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory Web site: http://www.ncrel.org/gap/ferg

14.

Gándara

(with Bial, D.). (2001). Paving the way to postsecondary education: K–12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth (Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on Access to Postsecondary Education). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.

15.

Gándara

(2002). A study of High School Puente: What we have learned about preparing Latino youth for postsecondary education. Educational Policy, 16, 474—495.

16.

Gándara

, & Mejorado

(2005). Putting your money where your mouth is: Mentoring as a strategy to increase access to higher education. In Tierney

W. G.

Corwin

Z. B.

, & Colyar

J. E.

(Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 89—110). Albany: State University of New York Press.

17.

Garcia

E. E.

(2001). Hispanic education in the United States: Raíces y alas. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

18.

Gibson

M. A.

(1988). Accommodation without assimilation: Sikh immigrants in an American high school. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

19.

Gibson

M. A.

(1997). Complicating the immigrant/involuntary minority typology. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 28, 431—454.

20.

Gibson

M. A.

(2005). It's all about relationships: Growing a community of college-oriented migrant youth. In Pease-Alvarez

, & Schecter

(Eds.), Learning, teaching, and community: Contributions of situated and participatory approaches to educational innovation (pp. 47—68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

21.

Gibson

M. A.

, & Bejínez

L. F.

(2002). Dropout prevention: How migrant education supports Mexican youth. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 155—175.

22.

Gibson

M. A.

Bejínez

L. F.

Hidalgo

, & Rolón

(2004). Belonging and school participation: Lessons from a migrant student club. In Gibson

Gándara

, & Koyama

J. P.

(Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp.129—149). New York: Teachers College Press.

23.

Goldenberg

Gallimore

Reese

, & Garnier

(2001). Cause or effect? A longitudinal study of immigrant Latino parents’ aspirations and expectations, and their children's school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 547—582.

24.

Goodenow

(1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21—43.

25.

Johnson

Levy

Morales

Morse

, & Prokopp

(1986). Migrant students at the secondary level: Issues and opportunities for change. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED270242)

26.

Koyama

J. P.

, & Gibson

M. A.

(2007). Marginalization and membership. In Van Galen

, & Noblit

(Eds.), Late to class: Social class and schooling in the new economy (pp. 87—111). Albany: State University of New York Press.

27.

Lareau

(1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73—85.

28.

Lynn

(2006). Education for the community: Exploring the culturally relevant practices of Black male teachers. Teachers College Record, 108, 2497—2522.

29.

McLaughlin

M. W.

Irby

M. A.

, & Langman

(1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

30.

Mehan

Villanueva

Hubbard

, & Lintz

(1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Morse

, & Hammer

P. C.

(1998). Migrant students attending college: Facilitating their success. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/15/c4/bb.pdf (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423097).

32.

Noddings

(1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

33.

Oakes

Quartz

Ryan

, & Lipton

(2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

34.

Osterman

K. F.

(2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323—367.

35.

Osterman

, & Freese

(2000). Nurturing the mind to improve learning: Teacher caring and student engagement. In Gregory

S. T.

(Ed.), The academic achievement of minority students (pp. 287—305). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

36.

Ream

R. K.

(2005). Uprooting children: Mobility, social capital, and Mexican American under-achievement. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.

37.

Roderick

Nagaoka

Coca

, & Moeller

(with Roddie, K., Gilliam, J., & Patton, D.). (2008, March). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college (Research Report). Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. Retrieved May 17, 2008, from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=122

38.

Rumberger

R. W.

(2003). The causes and consequences of student mobility. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 6—21.

39.

Rumberger

R. W.

(2004). What can be done to reduce the dropout rate? In Orfield

(Eds.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 243—254). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

40.

Rumberger

R. W.

, & Larson

K. A.

(1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107, 1—35.

41.

Solomon

Battistich

Kim

, & Watson

(1997). Teacher practices associated with students’ sense of the classroom as a community. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 235—267.

42.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

(2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York: Teachers College Press.

43.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

, & Dornbusch

S. M.

(1995). Social capital and the social reproduction of inequality: The formation of informational networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116—135.

44.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

, & Spina

S. U.

(2003). Informal mentors and role models in the lives of urban Mexican-origin adolescents. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 34, 231—254.

45.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

Vasquez

O. A.

, & Mehan

(2000). Engineering academic success through institutional support. In Gregory

S. T.

(Ed.), The academic achievement of minority students (pp. 213—305). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

46.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2002a, May 14). Demographic Profile, (Table DP-3). Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics, “Hillside” CDP, California: 2000. Retrieved May 17, 2002, from http://censtats.census.gove/cgi-bin/pct/pctProfile.pl

47.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2002b, December). Santa Cruz County, California: Income and Poverty in 1999: 2000 Census Tract (Table GCT-P14). Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://factfinder.census.gov/bf/_lang=en_vt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_GCTP14_CO1_geo_id=05000US06087.html

48.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. (2004a). State Title I Migrant participation information: 1999-2000 (Policy and Program Studies Service. Doc No. 2003-9). Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/migrant/final00.pdf

49.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. (2004b). Title I Migrant Education Program: Trends Summary Report: 1998–2001. Retrieved June 25, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/migrant/report01.pdf

50.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Migrant Education. (n.d.). Migrant Education Secondary Student Initiative. Retrieved November 21, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/secondarystudent.html

51.

U.S. Department of Labor. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy (2005). Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) 2001-2002: A demographic and employment profile of United States farm workers (Office of Programmatic Policy, Research Report No. 9). Washington, DC: Author.

52.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.

53.

Walls

C. A.

(2003). Providing highly mobile students with an effective education. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education. (ERIC Digest ED482918 2003-11-00)

54.

Wing

J. Y.

(2006, April). “Two schools under one roof”: Confronting resegregation and racial disparity within an integrated public high school. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.