Within mathematics education research, policy, and practice, race remains undertheorized in relation to mathematics learning and participation. Although race is characterized in the sociological and critical theory literatures as socially and politically constructed with structural expressions, most studies of differential outcomes in mathematics education begin and end their analyses of race with static racial categories and group labels used for the sole purpose of disaggregating data. This inadequate framing is, itself, reflective of a racialization process that continues to legitimize the social devaluing and stigmatization of many students of color. I draw from my own research with African American adults and adolescents, as well as recent research on the mathematical experiences of African American students conducted by other scholars. I also draw from the sociological and critical theory literatures to examine the ways that race and racism are conceptualized in the larger social context and in ways that are informative for mathematics education researchers, policy makers, and practitioners.
Purpose
To review and critically analyze how the construct of race has been conceptualized in mathematics education research, policy, and practice.
Research Design
Narrative synthesis.
Conclusion
Future research and policy efforts in mathematics education should examine racialized inequalities by considering the socially constructed nature of race.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). The education of Blacks in the South, 1860–1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2.
AndersonJ. D. (2004). The historical context for understanding the test score gap. National Journal of Urban Education and Practice, 11, 1—21.
3.
AppleM. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 412—431.
4.
BanksC. M., & BanksJ. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory Into Practice, 34, 152—158.
5.
BellD. (1992). Race, racism and American law. Boston: Little, Brown.
6.
BellE. T. (1951). Mathematics: Queen and servant of the sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
7.
BerryR. Q. (2003). Voices of African American male students: A portrait of successful middle school mathematics students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
8.
BerryR. Q. (2005). Voices of success: Descriptive portraits of two successful African-American male middle school students. Journal of African American Studies, 84, 46—62.
9.
BettieJ. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
BoalerJ (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
BolL., & BerryR. (2005). Secondary mathematics teachers’ perceptions of the achievement gap. High School Journal, 884, 32—45.
12.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62, 465—480.
13.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2001). White supremacy and racism in the post-civil rights era. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
15.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2005). “New racism,” color-blind racism, and the future of Whiteness in America. In DoaneA. W., & Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of race (pp. 271—284). New York: Routledge
16.
Bonilla-SilvaE., & GloverK. (2004). “We are all Americans”: The Latin Americanization of race relations in the United States. In KrysanM., & LewisA. (Eds.), The changing terrain of race and ethnicity (pp. 149—183). New York: Russell Sage.
17.
Brewley-KennedyD. (2005). The struggles of incorporating equity into practice in a university mathematics methods course [Monograph No. 1]. The Mathematics Educator, 16—28.
18.
CarterP. (2005). Keepin’ it real. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
CobbP., & HodgeL. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 249—284.
20.
DarderA., & TorresR. (2004). After race: Racism after multiculturalism. New York: New York University Press.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How “Teach for America” hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 21—34.
22.
DavidsonA. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools: Student narratives on race, gender, and academic engagement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
DelgadoR. (2002). Explaining the rise and fall of African American fortunes: Interest convergence and civil rights gains. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 37, 369—387.
24.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
25.
Diversity in Mathematics Education (DiME) Center for Learning and Teaching. (2007). Culture, race, power and mathematics education. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 405—433). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
26.
DornbuschS. M.PrescottB. L., & RitterP. L. (1987, April). The relation of high school academic performance and student effort to language use and recency of migration among Asian- and Pacific-Americans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
27.
DornbuschS. M.RitterP. L.LeidermanP. H.RobertsD. F., & FraleighM. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 55, 1244—1257.
28.
D'SouzaD. (1995). The end of racism. New York: Free Press.
29.
DuBoisW. E. B. (1939). Black folk, then and now: An essay in the history and sociology of the Negro race. New York: H. Holt and Company.
30.
Education Trust. (2003). African American achievement in America. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
ErnestP. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Routledge Falmer.
32.
EssedP. (2002). Everyday racism: A new approach to the study of racism. In EssedP., & GoldbergD. (Eds.), Race critical theories (pp. 176—194). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33.
Flores-Gonzalez. (2002). Street kids/school kids: Identity development in Latino students. New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
FordhamS., & OgbuJ. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting White.”’The Urban Review, 18, 176—206.
35.
FormanT. (2004). Color-blind racism and racial indifference: The role of racial apathy in facilitating enduring inequalities. In KrysanM., & LewisA. (Eds.), The changing terrain of race and ethnicity (pp. 43—66). New York: Russell Sage.
36.
FrankensteinM. (1990). Incorporating race, gender, and class issues into a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. Journal of Negro Education, 59, 336—347.
37.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, practice, and research. New York: Teachers College Press.
GutiérrezR. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 145—187.
40.
GutsteinE. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 37—73.
41.
GutsteinE. (2005). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. London: Routledge.
42.
HallR. (2002). Review of the books Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights and Mathematics success and failure among African American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Educational Researcher, 317, 34—39.
43.
HerrnsteinR., & MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44.
HillH.RowanB., & BallD. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42, 371—406.
45.
HosokawaB. (1969). Nisei: The quiet Americans. New York: William Morrow.
46.
KenneyP. A., & SilverE. A. (Eds.). (1997). Results from the sixth mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
47.
KohnA. (2000). The case against standardized testing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47—68.
50.
LeeC. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608—631.
51.
LeeC. D. (2004). Double voiced discourse: African American vernacular English as resource in cultural modeling classrooms. In BallA., & FreedmanS. W. (Eds.), New literacies for new Times: Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning for the 21st century (pp. 129—147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
LeeS. (1996). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
LeeS. (2005). Up against Whiteness. New York: Teachers College Press.
54.
LeonardJ., & DantleyS. J. (2005). Breaking through the ice: Dealing with issues of diversity in mathematics and science education courses. In RodriguezA., & KitchenR. (Eds.), Preparing prospective mathematics and science teachers to teach for diversity: Promising strategies for transformative action (pp. 87—117). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
LewisA. E. (2003a). Everyday race-making. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 283—305.
56.
LewisA. E. (2003b). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57.
LewisA. E. (2004). “What group?” Studying Whites and Whiteness in the era of “colorblindness.”Sociological Theory, 22, 623—646.
58.
LubienskiS. (2002). A closer look at Black-White mathematics gaps: Intersections of race and SES in NAEP achievement and instructional practices data. Journal of Negro Education, 71, 269—287.
59.
LubienskiS. T., & BowenA. (2000). Who's counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 626—633.
60.
MarableM. (1983). How capitalism underdeveloped Black America. Boston: South End Press.
61.
MartinD. (1997). Mathematics socialization and identity among African Americans: Community forces, school forces, and individual agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
62.
MartinD. (1998). Mathematics socialization and identity among African Americans: A multilevel analysis of community forces, school forces, and individual agency. Proposal submitted to National Academy of Education/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship competition.
63.
MartinD. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
MartinD. (2002). Mathematics socialization and identity: A sociocultural analysis of African American information technology workforce participation. Project proposal funded by National Science Foundation.
65.
MartinD. (2003). Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator, 132, 7—21.
66.
MartinD. (2006a). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 197—229.
67.
MartinD. (2006b). Mathematics learning and participation in African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In NasirN., & CobbP. (Eds.), Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas (pp. 146—158). New York: Teachers College Press.
68.
MartinD. (2007). Beyond missionaries or cannibals: Who should teach mathematics to African American children?High School Journal.
69.
MarxS., & PenningtonJ. (2003). Pedagogies of critical race theory: experiments with White preservice teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 91—110.
70.
McCarthyC. (2003). Contradictions of power and identity: Whiteness studies and the call of teacher education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 127—133.
71.
McIntoshP. (1989, July/August). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Peace and Freedom, 10—12.
72.
MilesR. (1988). Racialization. In CashmoreE. (Ed.), Dictionary of race and ethnic relations (2nd ed., pp. 246—247). London: Routledge.
73.
MilnerR. (2003). Reflection, racial competence, and critical pedagogy: How do we prepare pre-service teachers to pose tough questions?Race Ethnicity and Education, 6, 193—208.
74.
MoodyV. (2001). The social constructs of the mathematical experiences of African-American students. In AtwehB.ForgaszH., & NebresB. (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 255—278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75.
MosesR. P.KamiiM.SwapS. M., & HowardJ. (1989, November). The Algebra Project: Organizing in the spirit of Ella. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 423—443.
76.
MosesR. P., & CobbC. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
77.
MuraD. (1996, May 17). Re-examining Japanese Americans: From honorary Whites to model minorities. Asian Week, 1738, 7.
78.
NasirN. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2&3, 213—248.
79.
NasirN.HeimlichM.AtukpawuG., & O'ConnerK. (2007, April). Social constructions of race and identity in high school algebra classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
80.
National Center for Education Information. (2005, August 18). Profile of teachers in the U.S. 2005. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.ncei.com/POT05PRESSREL3.htm
81.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
82.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
83.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
84.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. KilpatrickJ.SwaffordJ., & FindellB. (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
85.
National Science Board. (2003, August). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America's potential. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
86.
National Science Board. (2004, May). Science and engineering indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
87.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88.
OakesJ. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. In CazdenC. B. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 153—222). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
89.
OakesJ.JosephR., & MuirK. (2001). Access and achievement in mathematics and science. In BanksJ. A., & McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 69—90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
90.
OmiM., & WinantH. (1994). Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
91.
ParkerL., & LynnM. (2002). What's race got to do with it? Critical race theory's conflicts with and connections to qualitative research methodology and epistemology. Curriculum Inquiry, 8, 7—22.
92.
PowellA. B. (2002). Ethnomathematics and the challenges of racism in mathematics education. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international mathematics education and society conference (Vol. 1, pp. 15–29). Copenhagen, Denmark: Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics.
93.
PowellA. B. (n.d.). The diversity backlash and the mathematical agency of students of color. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, Department of Urban Education and The Robert B. Davis Institute of Learning, New Brunswick, NJ.
94.
RAND Mathematics Study Panel. (2003). Mathematics proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica: RAND.
95.
ReedR. J., & OppongN. (2005). Looking critically at teachers’ attention to equity in their classrooms. [Monograph No. 1]. The Mathematics Educator, 2—15.
96.
ReyesL. H., & StanicG. (1988). Race, sex, socioeconomic status, and mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 26—43.
97.
RitterP. L., & DornbuschS. M. (1989, March). Ethnic variation in family influences on academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
98.
RoedigerD. (1999). The wages of Whiteness: Race and the making of the American working class (Rev. ed.). New York: Verso. (Original work published 1991)
99.
SchoenfeldA. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18, 253—286.
100.
SecadaW. (1989). Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest, and equity in mathematics education. Peabody Journal of Education, 662, 22—56.
101.
SecadaW. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In GrouwsD. (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623—660). New York: Macmillan.
102.
SecadaW. G. (1995). Social and critical dimensions for equity in mathematics education. In SecadaW. G.FennemaE., & AdajianL. B. (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 144—164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
103.
SellsL. (1973). High school mathematics as a the critical filter in the job market. Proceedings of the Conference on Minority Graduate Education, Berkeley, University of California.
104.
SellsL. (1976, February). The mathematics filter and the education of women and minorities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boston, MA.
105.
SheetsR. H. (2003). Competency versus good intentions: Diversity ideologies and teacher potential. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 111—120.
106.
SleeterC. (1993). How White teachers construct race. In McCarthyC., & CrichlowW. (Eds.), Race, identity and representation in education (pp. 157—171). New York: Routledge.
107.
SolorzanoD., & OrnelasA. (2002). A critical race analysis of advance placement classes: A case of educational inequalities. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 215—229.
108.
SolorzanoD., & OrnelasA. (2004). A critical race analysis of advance placement classes and selective admissions. High School Journal, 87, 15—26.
109.
SongM. (2004). Introduction: Who's at the bottom? Examining claims about racial hierarchy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 859—877.
110.
SteeleC. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613—629.
111.
SteeleC., & AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797—811.
112.
StevensonH. W., & StiglerJ. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
113.
StiffL. (1990). African-American students and the promise of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards. In CooneyT. J., & HirschC. R. (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s (Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 152—157), Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
114.
StiglerJ., & HiebertJ. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
115.
StinsonD. (2004). African American male students and achievement in school mathematics: A critical postmodern analysis of agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
116.
StrutchensM. E., & SilverE. A. (2000). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: Students’ performance, school experiences, and attitudes and beliefs. In SilverE. A., & KenneyP. A. (Eds.), Results from the 7th mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 45—72). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
SuzukiB. H. (1977). Education and the socialization of Asian Americans: A revisionist analysis of the “model minority” thesis. Amerasia Journal, 4, 23—51.
119.
TakagiD. (1992). The retreat from race: Asian-American admissions and racial politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
120.
TateW. F. (1994). Mathematics standards and urban education: Is this the road to recovery?The Educational Forum, 58, 380—390.
121.
TateW. F. (1995a). School mathematics and African American students: Thinking seriously about opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Administrational Quarterly, 31, 428—444.
122.
TateW. F. (1995b). Race, retrenchment, and reform of school mathematics, Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 477—485.
123.
TateW. F. (1997). Race, ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652—680.
124.
TateW. F. (2005). Access and opportunities to learn are not accidents: Engineering mathematical progress in your school. Greensboro, NC: SERVE Center.
125.
TateW. F., & RousseauC. (2002). Access and opportunity: The political and social context of mathematics education. In EnglishL. (Ed.), International handbook of research in mathematics education (pp. 271—300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
126.
ThernstromA., & ThernstromS. (2004). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.
127.
ThernstromS., & ThernstromA. (1999). America in Black and White: One nation indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.
128.
ThomasM. (2000, Winter). Anything but race: The social science retreat from racism. African American Research Perspectives, 6, 70—90.
129.
ThompsonL., & LewisB. (2005). Shooting for the stars: A case study of the mathematics achievement and career attainment of an African American male high school student. High School Journal, 884, 6—18.
130.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Mathematics equals opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
131.
WangJ., & LinE. (2005). Comparative studies on U.S. and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational researcher, 345, 3—13.
132.
WilliamsH. (2005). Self-taught: African American education in slavery and freedom. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
133.
WilsonL. D. (2007). High stakes testing in mathematics. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1099—1110). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
134.
WilsonW. J. (1978). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
135.
YossoT.ParkerL.SolorzanoD., & LynnM. (2005). From Jim Crow to affirmative action and back again: A critical race discussion of racialized rationales and access to higher education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 1—25.
136.
ZhouM., & LeeJ. (2004). The making of culture, identity, and ethnicity among Asian American youth. In LeeJ., & ZhouM. (Eds.), Asian American youth: Culture, identity, and ethnicity (pp. 1—30). London: Routledge.
