Analyzing Teachers’ Professional Interactions in a School as Social Capital: A Social Network Approach

Abstract

Background/Context

Researchers have proposed a number of lenses for analyzing teacher professional communities in recent years. These lenses have been useful in describing key dynamics of professional communities; however, none provides a compelling approach to how to integrate data from the school as a whole with case study data on individual interactions to create a coherent account of the structure and dynamics of teacher professional communities.

Objective

Our objective was to present and illustrate the application of social capital theory for analyzing the role of formal and informal teacher interactions in helping teachers enact changes to instruction associated with ambitious school reforms. Social capital theory posits that valued resources and expertise are embedded within social networks and that it is through social ties that one gains access to and can make use of resources to effect change. The network perspective directs researchers to focus simultaneously on the overall social structure of a school and on the expertise and resources exchanged through interactions among teachers that take place in meetings, staff rooms, hallways, and classrooms.

Setting

Our illustrations are contrasting cases of teacher communities in two elementary schools in California. In both school communities, the principals were committed to the idea of fostering greater interaction among colleagues as a strategy to improve literacy instruction. Both schools had similar levels of resources to support their goals through external funding from the state, but the schools had had different levels of success in implementing their reforms at the time of the study.

Research Design

We used an explanatory case study methodology that relied on social network, survey, and interview methods as sources of evidence for several alternative hypotheses relating to how the distribution of resources and expertise may have contributed to these schools’ different levels of success in implementing their reforms.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The comparative case analysis of the two schools provided evidence that analyzing the internal structure of the school community was necessary to help account for the distribution of access to resources and expertise in these two schools. Moreover, there was some evidence from survey and network data that the distribution of valued resources and expertise was related to the level of change observed in each school.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achinstein

(2002a). Community, diversity, and conflict among schoolteachers: The ties that blind. New York: Teachers College Press.

Achinstein

(2002b). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104, 421—455.

Bidwell

, & Yasumoto

J. Y.

(1997). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, colleague relationships, and instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72, 234—256.

Brown

J. S.

, & Duguid

(2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Bryk

A. S.

, & Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Burt

R. S.

(1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burt

R. S.

(2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345—423.

Camburn

Rowan

, & Taylor

J. E.

(2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347—373.

Coburn

C. E.

, & Russell

J. L.

(2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30 3, 203—235.

10.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95—S120.

11.

Coleman

J. S.

(1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Cross

, & Parker

(2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

13.

Curry

Gearhart

Kafka

, & Little

J. W.

(2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 32, 185—192.

14.

Darling-Hammond

Bransford

LePage

, & Hammerness

(Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

15.

Elmore

R. F.

(1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1—26.

16.

Festinger

Schachter

, & Bach

(1950). Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

17.

Frank

K. A.

(1995). Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 17, 27—56.

18.

Frank

K. A.

(1996). Mapping interactions within and between cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 18, 93—119.

19.

Frank

K. A.

(1998). Quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevels and through interpersonal relations. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171—216.

20.

Frank

K. A.

Sykes

Anagnastopoulos

Cannata

Chard

, & McCrory

(2006, April). Are Board certified teachers more helpful than non-certified teachers? A simple question? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

21.

Frank

K. A

, & Yasumoto

J. Y.

(1998). Linking action to social structure within a system: Social capital within and between subgroups. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 642—686.

22.

Frank

K. A

, & Zhao

(2005). Subgroups as a meso-level entity in the social organization of schools. In Hedges

L. V.

, & Schneider

(Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 200—224). New York: Sage.

23.

Glaser

B. G.

, & Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

24.

Goddard

R. D.

Hoy

W. K.

, & Woolfolk

(2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37, 479—507.

25.

Gronn

(2002). Distributed leadership. In Leithwood

, & Hallinger

(Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653—696). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

26.

Grossman

Wineburg

S. S.

, & Woolworth

(2000). What makes teacher community different from a gathering of teachers. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

27.

Grossman

Wineburg

S. S.

, & Woolworth

(2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942—1012.

28.

Halverson

R. R.

(2003). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11 37. Retrieved August 26, 2007, from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa

29.

Homans

G. C.

(1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt-Brace.

30.

Hoy

W. K.

Tarter

C. J.

, & Witkoskie

(1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 38—58.

31.

Lamont

(2003). Expertise location and the learning organization. KMWorld Magazine. Retrieved August 26, 2007, from http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=9410

32.

Lave

, & Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Lin

(2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Little

J. W.

(1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325—340.

35.

Little

J. W.

(1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 129—151.

36.

Little

J. W.

(2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917—946.

37.

Little

J. W.

(2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 913—945.

38.

McLaughlin

M. W.

, & Talbert

J. E.

(2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

39.

Nee

, & Ingram

(1998). Embeddedness and beyond: Institutions, exchange, and social structure. In Brinton

M. C.

, & Nee

(Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 19—45). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

40.

Neufeld

, & Roper

(2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity: Promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Program on Education and Annenberg Institute for School Reform.

41.

Penuel

W. R.

Frank

K. A.

, & Krause

A. E.

(2006). The distribution of resources and expertise and the implementation of schoolwide reform initiatives. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 522—528). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

42.

Penuel

W. R.

Frank

K. A.

, & Krause

A. E.

(2007, April). A social network approach to examining the effects of distributed leadership in schoolwide reform initiatives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

43.

Penuel

W. R.

Frank

K. A.

, & Riel

M. R.

(2007, February). Instructional change and improved achievement: The significance of the internal social structure of schools. Paper presented at the Conference on Human and Social Capital in Learning Systems, Pittsburgh, PA.

44.

Penuel

W. R.

Sussex

Korbak

, & Hoadley

(2006). Investigating the potential of using social network analysis in educational evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 437—451.

45.

Portes

(1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1—24.

46.

Portes

, & Sensenbrenner

(1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Note on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320—1350.

47.

Putnam

R. D.

(1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and economic growth. Current, 356, 4—6.

48.

Spillane

J. P.

(2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

49.

Spillane

J. P.

(2007, February). Social capital at work. Paper presented at the Conference on Human and Social Capital in Learning Systems, Pittsburgh, PA.

50.

Spillane

J. P.

Halverson

R. R.

, & Diamond

J. B.

(2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30 3, 23—27.

51.

Strauss

A. L.

, & Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

52.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meanings, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Westheimer

(1998). Among schoolteachers: Community, individuality, and ideology in teachers’ work. New York: Teachers College Press.

54.

Woolcock

(1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151—208.

55.

Yasumoto

J. Y.

Uekawa

, & Bidwell

(2001). The collegial focus and student achievement: Consequences of high school faculty social organization for students on achievement in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 74, 181—209.

56.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.