Winning the Epistemological Struggle: Constructing a Cultural Model of Shared Authority in an Elementary Classroom

Abstract

Background

Constructivist epistemology offers an explanation of the nature of knowledge and how people learn that has emerged as a prominent approach endorsed by schools of teacher education. This perspective stands in direct contrast to the understanding of knowledge and learning based on behaviorist epistemology. These opposing epistemological views represent two paradigms of educational practice within which the role of authority is positioned very differently, each with its own effect on the way learning is understood. When teachers are asked to redefine the role they take in classrooms, they are essentially being asked to successfully manage a shift between paradigms. This task requires the abandonment of established ways of practice and the development of new strategies of action.

Focus of Study

This article addresses the following questions: (1) How does a teacher go about reorganizing participation patterns in ways that redefine the habits and modes of experience that are largely taken for granted in schools? (2) What are the results in terms of the distribution of authority and whose knowledge counts? (3) What are the effects on opportunities for learning when such paradigmatic shifts are accomplished? Specifically, the intent of this study is to identify the ways in which authority was a shared construct among members of a fourth/fifth-grade classroom, how members took up the role of authority, and the effect that it had on opportunities for learning.

Research Design

Three classroom episodes were theoretically sampled as key events from an ethnographic data set collected over one academic year. Using an ethnographic and critical discourse approach designed to study interaction in educational settings, each episode was analyzed to illustrate how authority and the situated processes and practices associated with it were socially constituted through the language of the classroom. Evidence was provided within each set of analyses to show that these episodes were not isolated instances, but reflected established patterns of practice among participants.

Conclusions

Overall, the findings serve as an example of how shared authority contributes to alternative ways of viewing knowledge and whose knowledge counts, and what it means to be a learner. Most important, this study demonstrates that when shared authority is a consistent classroom practice, what emerges over time is a cultural model within which students can begin to restructure their developing epistemological frames as they revise their notions of knowledge and ways of knowing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amit

, and Fried

(2002). Authority in the mathematics classroom and its influence on students’ ability to reflect. In Cockburn

A.D.

, and Nardi

(Eds.), PME26: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference 2 (pp. 41—48). Norwich, England: University of East Anglia.

Belenky

M. F.

, Clinchy

B. M.

, Goldberger

N. R.

, and Tarule

J. M.

(1986). Women's way of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.

Bruner

(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Castanheira

M. L.

, Crawford

, Dixon

, and Green

J. L.

(2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literacy practices. Linguistics and Education, 11, 353—400.

Chandler

(1992). Learning for what purpose? Questions when viewing classroom learning from a socio-cultural curriculum perspective. In and and Marshall

(Ed.), Redefining student learning: Roots of educational restructuring (pp. 33—58). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Collins

, and Green

J. L.

(1992). Learning in classroom settings: Making or breaking a culture. In and and Marshall

(Ed.), Redefining student learning: Roots of educational restructuring (pp. 59—85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Dewey

(1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.

Edwards

, and Mercer

(1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Falmer Press.

Erickson

(1986). Qualitative research. In and and Wittrock

(Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119—161). New York: Macmillan.

10.

Fairclough

(1992). Critical language awareness. New York: Longman.

11.

Fairclough

(2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge

12.

Fernie

D. E.

(1988). Becoming a student: Messages from first settings. Theory Into Practice, 27, 3—10.

13.

Fosnot

(Ed.). (1996). Constructivisim: A psychological theory of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

14.

Fraser

(1999, December). “They keep asking questions and want to know more”: Enhancing students’ (and teachers’) learning through curriculum integration. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE)/New Zealand Association for Research in Education (NZARE) conference, Melbourne, Australia.

15.

Gee

J. P.

(1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.

16.

Gee

, and Green

(1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119—169.

17.

Geertz

(1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

18.

Goffman

(1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gathering. New York: Free Press.

19.

Green

, and Dixon

(1993). Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5, 231—239.

20.

Green

J. L.

, and Harker

J. O.

(1982). Gaining access to learning. In and and Wilkinson

L.C.

(Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 46—76). New York: Academic Press.

21.

Green

J. L.

, and Meyer

L. A.

(1991). The embeddedness of reading in classroom life. In Baker

, and Luke

(Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 141—160). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

22.

Green

J. L.

, and Wallat

(Eds.). (1981). Ethnography and language in educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

23.

Gumperz

(1986). Interactive sociolinguistics on the study of schooling. In and and Cook-Gumperz

(Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 45—68). New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Gumperz

, and Hymes

(1986). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Basil Blackwell.

25.

Gumperz

J. J.

, and Tannen

(1979). Individual and social differences in language use. In Fillmore

, Kempler

, and Wang

(Eds.), Individual differences in language ability (pp. 305—325). New York: Academic Press.

26.

Hamm

J. V.

, and Perry

(2002). Learning mathematics in first-grade classrooms: On whose authority? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 126—137.

27.

Hansen

D. T.

(2006). Epilogue: The sources and expressions of classroom authority. In Pace

J.L.

, and Hemmings

A.H.

(Eds.), Classroom authority (pp. 175—185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Hausfather

(1998). Changing students’ relationships to knowledge in a theme-study classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 33—47.

29.

Hawkins

(2001). The reassertion of traditional authority in a constructivist pedagogy. Teaching Education, 11, 279—296.

30.

Hein

G. E.

(1991, October). The museum and the needs of people. Paper presented and the International Committee of Museum Educators Conference, Jerusalem, Israel

31.

Hofer

B. K.

, and Pintrich

P. R.

(1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88—140.

32.

Ivanic

(1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6, 3—15.

33.

Johnston

, Woodside-Jiron

, and Day

(2001). Teaching and learning literate epistemologies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 223—233.

34.

Jones

G. M.

, and Brader-Arje

(2002, Spring). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3). Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://acjournal.org/holdings/vol5/iss3/special/jones.htm

35.

Kantor

, Green

, Bradley

, and Lin

(1992). The construction of schooled discourse repertoires: An interactional sociolinguistic perspectives on learning to talk in preschool. Linguistics and Education, 4, 131—172.

36.

Kaufman

(1996). Constructivist-based experiential learning in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 40—50.

37.

Kelly

G. J.

(1999, April). Disciplinary knowledge as interactional accomplishments in school settings: Methodological considerations. Invited presentation for the Language and Social Processes Special Interest Group at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

38.

Kelly

, and Crawford

(1996). Students’ interactions with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 693—707.

39.

Kim

(2001). Social constructivism. In and and Orey

(Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved July 2, 2006, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/SocialConstructivism.htm

40.

Kroll

L. R.

, and Labosky

V. K.

(1996). Practicing what we preach: Constructivism in a teacher education program. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 63—72.

41.

Lin

(1993). Language of and in the classroom: Constructing the patterns of social life. Linguistics and Education, 5, 367—409.

42.

Mehan

(1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

43.

Mitchell

D. E.

, and Spady

W.E.

. (1983). Authority, power, and the legitimation of social control. Educational Administration Quarterly,19, 5—33.

44.

Oyler

(1996). Sharing authority: Student initiations during teacher-led read-alouds of information books. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 149—160.

45.

Pace

J. L.

(2003). Revisiting classroom authority: Theory and ideology meet practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 1559—1585.

46.

Pace

J. L.

, and Hemmings

A. H.

(2006). Understanding classroom authority as a social construction. In Pace

J.L.

, and Hemmings

A.H.

(Eds.), Classroom authority (pp. 1—31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

47.

Peters

R. S.

(1966). Ethics and education. London: George Allen and Unwin.

48.

Piaget

(1964). Development and learning. In Ripple

, and Rocksdale

(Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7—19). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

49.

Richardson

(1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In and and Richardson

(Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp. 3—14). Washington, DC: Palmer Press.

50.

Spradley

(1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

51.

Swidler

(1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273—286.

52.

Turner

J. H.

(1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

53.

Tuyay

, Jennings

, and Dixon

(1995). Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 19, 75—110.

54.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.