Speaking like a “Good American”: National Identity and the Legacy of German-Language Education

Abstract

Background/Context

As a case study in minority language restriction, the German example provides a useful historical counterpoint to more recent debates regarding the place of non-English languages in American schools.

Focus of Study and Research Design

This historical analysis examines the role of education in the changing discourse of minority languages and national identity, specifically analyzing the tradition of German-language education in the United States as it changed during World War I.

Findings

The establishment of German-medium public and private schooling in the United States prospered until the late 1800s as the result of practical considerations and German communities’ own commitments to linguistic, religious, and/or cultural maintenance. German use in some of these schools declined in relation to English as the result of demographic shifts and efforts in the 1880s and 1890s to restrict non-English languages in schools. The advent of World War I, however, dramatically altered the status of German in society generally, and in education specifically. Wartime federal rhetoric and involvement, educational and social policies, and debates within the educational community indicate not only a period of restricted non-English language use in schools, but they also signal the emergence of a new conception of American identity, one defined in linguistic terms and displayed through the exclusive use of English.

Conclusions/Recommendations

Shifts in rhetoric and policy offer significant insight into the relationships between minority languages and larger issues of power and social control; the restriction and subsequent loss of a seemingly privileged non-English language in the United States reveals the precarious position of any minority language in society. Contemporary discussions about immigration, official languages, and national identities continue to operate within a monolingual English paradigm, carrying significant implications for schools serving immigrant and language minority students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

D. W.

(1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

Banks

(Ed.). (2005). Series foreword. Teaching and learning in two languages: Bilingualism and schooling in the United States (pp. vii—xi). New York: Teachers College Press.

Conklin

N. F.

, and Lourie

M. A.

(1983). A host of tongues. New York: Macmillan.

Crawford

(1998). Anatomy of the English-only movement. In and and Kibbee

D.A.

(Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 96—122). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Crawford

(2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Services.

Crawford

(2006). English as the “national language”? A political blunder by Republicans. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://users.rcn.com/crawj/langpol/NationalLanguage.pdf

Daniels

(2002). Coming to America: A history of immigration and ethnicity in American life (2nd ed.). New York: Perennial.

Dicker

S. J.

(1996). Languages in America: A pluralist view. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Draper

J. B.

, and Hicks

J. H.

(2002). Foreign language enrollments in public secondary schools, fall 2000. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3389

10.

Fillmore

L. W.

(2004). Language in education. In Finegan

, and Rickford

J.R.

(Eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the twenty-first century (pp. 339—360). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Fishman

J. A.

(2004). Language maintenance, language shift, and reversing language shift. In Bhatia

T.K.

, and Ritchie

W.C.

(Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 406—436). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

12.

Gamboa

(2006, May 19). Senate battles over English as “national” language. Chicago Sun Times. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://www.suntimes.com

13.

García

(2005). Teaching and learning in two languages. New York: Teachers College Press.

14.

Harris

W. T.

(1875). German-English instruction. Twenty first annual report of the board of directors of the Saint Louis public schools for the year ending August 1, 1875 (pp. 111—117). St. Louis, MO: Globe-Democrat Job Printing Company.

15.

Hartmann

(1948). The movement to Americanize the immigrant. New York: Columbia University Press.

16.

Hawgood

(1940). The tragedy of German-America. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.

17.

Hayakawa

S. I.

(1992). The case for official English. In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy (pp. 94—100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1985).

18.

Heath

S. B.

(1981). English in our language heritage. In Parker

C.A.

, and Heath

S.B.

(Eds.), Language in the USA (pp. 6—20). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Heath

S. B.

(1992). Why no official tongue? In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy (pp. 20—31). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1976).

20.

Higham

(1988). Strangers in the land: Patterns of American nativism, 1860–1925 (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

21.

Higham

(1992). Crusade for Americanization. In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy (pp. 72—84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1988).

22.

Hurt

(2006, May 19). Reid calls language proposal racist. The Washington Times. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://www.washingtontimes.com

23.

Kloss

(1966). German-American language maintenance efforts. In and and Fishman

(Ed.), Language loyalty in the United States (pp. 206—252). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

24.

Kloss

(1977). The American bilingual tradition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

25.

Leibowicz

(1992). Official English: Another Americanization campaign? In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English Controversy (pp. 101—111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1985).

26.

Luebke

F. C.

(1974). Bonds of loyalty: German-Americans and World War I. DeKalb: Northern Illinois Press.

27.

Macías

R. F.

(1977). Language policy and social control in the United States from colonial times to 1900. (Available at Green Library, Stanford University, Stanford, CA)

28.

Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).

29.

Miller

D. T.

(2006). Know nothing party. Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0161940-0&template-name=/article/articl

30.

Moore

W. H.

(1937). The conflict concerning the German language and German propaganda in the public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

31.

Paulston

C. B.

(1990). Educational policies in Utopia. In Harley

, Allen

, Cummins

, and Swain

(Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 187—197). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Perlmann

(1990). Historical legacies: 1840–1920. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 508, 27—37.

33.

Reyhner

(1992). Policies toward American Indian languages: A historical sketch. In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English Controversy (pp. 41—47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34.

Ricento

(1998). National language policy in the United States. In Ricento

, and Burnaby

(Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada (pp. 85—112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

35.

Ricento

(2005). Problems with the “language-as-resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 348—368.

36.

Romaine

(1995). Bilingualism. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

37.

Roosevelt

(1992). One flag, one language. In and and Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy (pp. 84—85). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1917).

38.

Schmidt

(2000). Language policy and identity politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

39.

Skutnabb-Kangas

(2000). Linguistic genocide in education–or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

40.

U.S. English. (1992). In defense of our common language. In Crawford

(Ed.), Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy (pp. 143—147). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1984).

41.

Wiley

T. G.

(1998). The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In Ricento

, and Burnaby

(Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada (pp. 211—241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

42.

Wiley

T. G.

(2000). Continuity and change in language ideologies. In and and Ricento

(Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 67—85). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

43.

Wright

(1992). U.S. English. In and and Crawford

(Ed.). Language loyalties: A source book on the official English Controversy (pp. 127–129). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1983)

44.

Yamamoto

A. Y.

, and Zepeda

(2004). Native American languages. In Finegan

, and Rickford

J.R.

(Eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the twenty-first century (pp. 153—181). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.