Examining Teachers’ Beliefs and Instructional Practices in Secondary Foreign Language Classes on Honors and Non Honors Tracks: The Role of Teaching for Communication

Abstract

Background/Context

Little research to date has examined the honors foreign language classroom or how it differs from its non-honors counterpart. This study examines possible differences between the two kinds of classrooms and what factors may affect these differences.

Purpose

The researcher observed a total of 54 honors and non-honors French and Spanish classes at all levels at a high school in a Midwestern state to ascertain the instructional practices used therein. He also administered questionnaires to and interviewed the seven teachers of these classes regarding the classroom practices he observed and the factors that may have influenced these practices, focusing particularly on any differences between the high-and low-tier classes.

Setting

A high school of 1,900 students in a small town in a Midwestern state.

Subjects

Seven high school teachers of French and Spanish.

Research Design

This study incorporates analysis of the lesson content of the two kinds of classes using the chi-square technique and qualitative techniques to analyze the data yielded by questionnaires and open-ended interviews with each teacher.

Findings

A highly significant statistical relationship exists between the tier of class (honors v. non-honors) and the type of language activity (form-focused v. communicative). Analysis of teachers’ narratives also reveals several factors that enter into play in shaping their instructional practices. These include: (1) students’ preferences for specific teaching styles and instructional emphases; (2) honors students’ desire for the prestige that comes from enrollment in high-tier classes; (3) students’ level of motivation for language learning; and (4) students’ level of engagement in their language learning.

Conclusions

The researcher concludes that foreign language educators must address the issue of reserving communicative teaching for elite students for the profession's future viability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astin

, Green

, Korn

, Schalit

, and Berz

(1988). The American freshman: National norms for fall 1988. Los Angeles: Cooperative Institutional Research Program, UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.

Cazden

C. B.

(1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Crookes

, and Chaudron

(2001). Guidelines for language classroom instruction. In and and Celce-Murcia

(Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 13—28). Boston: Heinle and Heinle/Thomson Learning.

Gamoran

(1986). Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education, 59(4), 185—198.

Gamoran

(1989). Measuring curriculum differentiation. American Journal of Education, 97, 129—143.

Gamoran

(1992). Access to excellence: Assignment to honors English classes in the transition from middle to high school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 185—204.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2002). Foreign language acquisition and language-based learning disabilities. In and and Robinson

(Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 95—112). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Grossman

P. L.

(1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge & teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hatch

, and Lazaraton

(1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

10.

Herr

N. E.

(1991). The influence of program format on the professional development of science teachers: Teacher perceptions of AP and honors science courses. Science Education, 75(6), 619—629.

11.

Herr

N. E.

(1992a). A comparative analysis of the perceived influence of advanced placement and honors programs upon science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 521—532.

12.

Herr

N. E.

(1992b). Administrative policies regarding advanced placement and honors coursework. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 76, 80—87.

13.

Janesick

V. J.

(1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In Denzin

N.K.

, and Lincoln

Y.S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209—219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

14.

Johnson

K. E.

(1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439—452.

15.

Kelly Hall

(1995). Aw man where you goin'? Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 37—62.

16.

Kleinsasser

R. C.

(1993a). Changing teachers’ task perceptions as a vehicle for improving foreign language instruction. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 26(1), 1—7.

17.

Kleinsasser

R. C.

(1993b). A tale of two technical cultures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 373—383.

18.

Kleinsasser

R. C.

, and Savignon

S. J.

(1991). Linguistics, language pedagogy, and teachers’ technical cultures. In and and Alatis

J.E.

(Ed.) Georgetown University round table on languages and literatures 1991 (pp. 289—301). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

19.

Loveless

(1999). The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

20.

Lucas

(1999). Tracking inequality. New York: Teachers College Press.

21.

Merriam

S. B.

(1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Munks

J. J.

(1996). The case for multilingual citizens in the 21st century. In and and Wing

(Ed.), Foreign languages for all: Challenges and choices (pp. 1—20). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

23.

Morris

M. C.

(1997). An examination of the beliefs and practices of four university teaching assistants of French toward target language usage in their classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa.

24.

Morris

M. C.

(1999). Beliefs and practices of teaching assistants toward target language use in first-year university language classrooms. In and and Kathy Heilenman

(Ed.), Research issues in language program direction (pp. 101—141). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

25.

Morris

M. C.

(2001). Factors affecting the congruence of beliefs about teaching and classroom practices of GTAs in elementary foreign language courses. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 8(2), 45—53.

26.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

27.

Oakes

, Gamoran

, and Page

(1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In and and Jackson

(Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.

28.

Omaggio Hadley

(2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

29.

Palmer

P. J.

(1993). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

30.

Spinelli

(1996). Meeting the challenges of the diverse secondary school population. In and and Wing

(Ed.), Foreign languages for all: Challenges and choices (pp. 57—90). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

31.

Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (1999). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc.

32.

Tedick

D. J.

, and Walker

C. L.

(1994). Second language teacher education: The problems that plague us. The Modern Language Journal, (78)3, 300—312.

33.

Tedick

D. J.

, and Walker

C. L.

(1996). R(T)eaching all students: Necessary changes in teacher education. In and and Wing

(Ed.), Foreign languages for all: Challenges and choices (pp. 187—220). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

34.

VanPatten

(1998). Perceptions of and perspectives on the term “communicative.” Hispania, (81)4, 925—932.

35.

Watzke

(2003). Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

36.

Yonezawa

, Wells

A. S.

, and Serna

(2002). Choosing tracks: “Freedom of choice” in detracking schools. American Educational Research Journal, (39)1, 37—67.