New teachers face an array of challenges in today's schools. Even when teachers leave credential programs with useful preparation, early-career jobs and contexts shape and constrain teachers’ goals and practice related to teaching diverse learners. Becoming change agents can be a tall order.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
Considering this context, we sought to understand how graduates of one teacher credential program appear prepared to advocate for educational equity in their new jobs by asking three questions: (1) What challenges do new teachers identify in classes and schools that require advocacy for some youth? (2) In what ways do they respond to such challenges? and (3) What enables these acts of advocacy?
Research Design
A total of 38 graduates, all currently teaching, participated in five separate 3-hour focus groups of 5–10 teachers each. We used focus groups as a research tool to triangulate a range of other data, including artifacts and surveys. We sought teachers’ deep reflections on practice, on their preparation for advocacy work, and on their professional needs. We transcribed focus group discussions then subjected these to a series of procedures, including analysis of content and themes of teachers’ narratives.
Findings/Results
Teachers reported actions to address equity in a range of sites, with the classroom as the core site for teachers’ advocacy work. In complex narratives, teachers reported trying to meet learning needs of diverse students. English language learners’ needs especially prompted acts of advocacy in and beyond the classroom. These included instructional tailoring, out-of-class tutorials, hunts for better texts and tests, a library field trip, creation of a culture/computer club, heightened parent contacts, and launching of a bilingual parent group. Teachers’ acts of advocacy shared four crosscutting themes: a goal of equitable access to resources and support, convictions about equity, interceding on behalf of students in need, and engaging coadvocates. Teachers reported that these themes have grounding in their teacher credential program, which featured advocating for equity in its mission, goals, and practices. Those with bilingual education credentials engaged in more acts of advocacy beyond the classroom, and analyses suggest that this may be due to credential program experiences, life experiences, and the larger sociopolitical context for teaching English language learners.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Results challenge conventional models of learning to teach, documenting how teachers, even in the throes of the induction period, can focus on student learning and on ways to advocate in and beyond the classroom for those in need of someone interceding on their behalf, particularly when well prepared to do so.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchinsteinB. (2006). Mentors’ political and organizational literacy in negotiating induction contexts. In AchinsteinB., and AthanasesS.Z. (Eds.), Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers (pp. 136—150). New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
AchinsteinB., and AthanasesS. Z. (2005). Focusing new teachers on diversity and equity: Toward a knowledge base for mentors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 843—862.
3.
AchinsteinB., and BarrettA. (2004). (Re)Framing classroom contexts: How new teachers and mentors view diverse learners and challenges of practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 716—746.
4.
AthanasesS. Z., and AchinsteinB. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor's repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 1486—1520.
5.
AthanasesS. Z., and MartinK. J. (2001, April). Fostering advocacy for all learners in a teacher education program. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
6.
AthanasesS. Z., and MartinK. J. (2006). Teaching and learning advocacy for educational equity in a teacher credential program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 627—646.
7.
AuK. H., and BlakeK. M. (2003). Cultural identity and learning to teach in a diverse community. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 192—205.
8.
BanksJ. (1995). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In BanksJ.A., and McGee BanksC.A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 3—49). New York: Macmillan.
9.
BerginC., TalleyS., and HamerL. (2003). Prosocial behaviours of young adolescents: A focus group study. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 13—32.
10.
BrownC. L. (2000). Sociolinguistic dynamics of gender in focus groups. In and and HopsonR.K. (Ed.), How and why language matters in evaluation: New directions for evaluation (No. 86, pp. 55—67). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BuendíaE. (2000). Power and possibility: The construction of a pedagogical practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(4), 147—163.
14.
CarterK. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5—12, 18.
15.
CarterK., and DoyleW. (1996). Personal narrative and life history in learning to teach. In SikulaJ., ButteryT.J., and GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 120—142). New York: Simon and Shuster Macmillan.
16.
CauseyV. E., ThomasC. D., and ArmentoB. J. (2000). Cultural diversity is basically a foreign term to me: The challenges of diversity for preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 33—45.
17.
Cochran-SmithM. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 279—309.
18.
CohenE., and LotanR. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
ConnellyF. M., and ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2—14.
20.
ConnellyF. M., and ClandininD. J. (1994, Winter). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 145—158.
CullerJ. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics, and the study of literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
24.
Darling-HammondL. (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification, and assessment. In and and RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 751—776). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
25.
DavisB. (2006) Curriculum to support mentor development: Lessons from field-tested practices. In AchinsteinB., and AthanasesS.Z. (Eds.), Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers (pp. 109—121). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
de OliveiraL. C., and AthanasesS. Z. (2007). Graduates’ reports of advocating for English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(3), 202—215.
27.
DysonA. H., and GenishiC. (1994). The need for story: Cultural diversity in classroom and community. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
28.
EisnerE. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
El-HajT. R. A. (2003). Practicing for equity from the standpoint of the particular: Exploring the work of one urban teacher network. Teachers College Record, 105, 817—845.
30.
FarrellT. S. C. (2003). Learning to teach English language during the first year: Personal influences and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 95—111.
31.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013—1055.
32.
FernE. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
FloresJ. G., and AlonsoC. G. (1995). Using focus groups in educational research: Exploring teachers’ perspectives on educational change. Evaluation Review, 19, 84—101.
34.
Florio-RuaneS. (2001). Teacher education and the cultural imagination: Autobiography, conversation, and narrative. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
FullerF. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207—226.
36.
GomezM. L., and TabachnickB. R. (1992). Telling teaching stories. Teaching Education, 4, 129—138.
37.
GoreJ. M., and ZeichnerK. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 119—136.
38.
GrantC. A. (1989). Equity, equality, teachers, and classroom life. In and and SecadaW.G. (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 89—102). New York: Falmer.
39.
HargreavesA. (1995). Development and desire: A postmodern perspective. In GuskeyT.R., and HubermanM. (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 9—34). New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
HavelockE. A. (1986). The muse learns to write. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
HaycockK. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 6—11.
42.
HeathS. B. (1986). Taking a cross-cultural look at narratives. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 84—94.
43.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499—534.
44.
JenningsL. B., and SmithC. P. (2002). Examining the role of critical inquiry for transformative practices: Two joint case studies of multicultural teacher education. Teachers College Record, 104, 456—481.
45.
KaganD. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129—169.
46.
KatzL. G., and RathsJ. D. (1985). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 301—307.
47.
KauffmanD., JohnsonS. M., KardosS. M., LiuE., and PeskeH. G. (2002). “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 273—300.
48.
KelchtermansG., and BalletK. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105—120.
49.
KelchtermansG., and HamiltonM. L. (2004). The dialectics of passion and theory: Exploring the relation between self-study and emotion. In LoughranJ.J., HamiltonM.L., LaBoskeyV.K., and RussellT.L. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 785—810). New York: Springer.
50.
KnowlesJ. G., and Holt-ReynoldsD. (1994, Winter). An introduction: Personal histories as medium, method, and milieu for gaining insights into teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 5—12.
51.
KohlP. L., and WittyE. P. (1996). Equity challenges. In SikulaJ., ButteryT.J., and GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 837—866). New York: Simon and Shuster Macmillan.
52.
KruegerR. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
LaFramboiseK. L., and GriffithP. L. (1997). Using literature cases to examine diversity issues with preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 369—382.
55.
LankfordH., LoebS., and WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37—62.
56.
LawrenceS. M., and TatumB. D. (1997). Teachers in transition: The impact of antiracist professional development on classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 99, 162—178.
57.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The mentor phenomenon. In and and CazdenC. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 297—351). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
58.
MartinK. J. (2000). “Oh, I have a story”: Narrative as a teacher's classroom model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 349—363.
59.
MerinoB. J. (1999). Preparing secondary teachers to teach a second language: The case of the United States with a focus on California. In So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism and ESL in the secondary school (pp. 225—254). New York: Teachers College Press.
60.
MerinoB. J., and HolmesP. V. (2002, April). Preparing teachers as advocates for educational equity through teacher research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
61.
Merino, B. J., Martin, K. J., & Pryor, K. (with Goldman, B., Murai, H., & Teacher Education Work Group). (2001). Graduates’ perspectives on the role of their teacher education program in facilitating their growth as advocates for equity in learning: Survey results relating the experimental model to the standards. Report to the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
62.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
63.
MilesM. B., and HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
MorganD. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative research methods (Vol. 16). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
MyersG., and MacnaghtenP. (1999). Can focus groups be analyzed as talk? In BarbourR.S., and KitzingerJ. (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice (pp. 173—185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
NietoS. (2004). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (4th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
67.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
OakesJ. (1990). Multiplying inequities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
69.
OakesJ., FrankeM. L., QuartzK. H., and RogersJ. (2002). Research for high-quality urban teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 228—234.
70.
OlmedoI. M. (1997). Challenging old assumptions: Preparing teachers for inner city schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 245—258.
71.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
72.
PorterA., YoungsP., and OddenA. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In and and RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259—297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
QuartzK. H.the TEP Research Group. (2003). “Too angry to leave”: Supporting new teachers’ commitment to transform urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 99—111.
75.
RichertA. E. (1991). Case methods and teacher education: Using cases to teach teacher reflection. In TabachnickR., and ZeichnerK.M. (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiry oriented teacher education (pp. 130—150). London: Falmer.
76.
RichertA. E. (1997). Teaching teachers for the challenge of change. In LoughranJ., and RussellT. (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 73—94). London: Falmer Press.
77.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
79.
SecadaW. G. (1989). Educational equity versus equality of education: An alternative conception. In and and SecadaW.G. (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 68—88). New York: Falmer.
80.
ShieldsP. M., HumphreyD. C., WechslerM. E., RiehlL. M., Tiffany-MoralesJ., and WoodworthK.. (2001). Teaching and California's future: The status of the teaching profession 2001. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
81.
ShulmanL. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In ShulmanL.S., and SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484—504). New York: Longman.
82.
SleeterC. E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of Whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 94—106.
83.
StewartD. W., and ShamdasaniP. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
84.
StigginsR. (1999). Assessment, student confidence, and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 191—198.
85.
StodolskyS. S., and GrossmanP. L. (2000). Changing students, changing teaching. Teachers College Record, 102, 125—172.
86.
TimperleyH. S., and PhillipsG. (2003). Changing and sustaining teachers’ expectations through professional development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 627—641.
87.
TroutmanP. L., PankratiusW. J., and GallavanN. P. (1999). Preservice teachers construct a view on multicultural education: Using Banks’ levels of integration of ethnic content to measure change. Action in Teacher Education, 20(1), 1—14.
88.
VillegasA. M., and LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 20—32.
89.
WilsonS. M., FlodenR. E., and Ferrini-Mundy (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190—204.
90.
WitherellC. (1991). The self in narrative: A journey into paradox. In WitherellC., and NoddingsN. (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 83—95). New York: Teachers College Press.
