Technology Tools for Collecting,Managing,and Using Assessment Data to Inform Instruction and Improve Achievement

Bakia M. , Mitchell K. , and Yang E. (2007). State strategies and practices for educational technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Behrens J. T. , Mislevy R. J. , Bauer M. , Williamson D. M. , and Levy R. (2004). Introduction to evidence centered design in a global e-learning program. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 295—301.

Bennett R. E. (2001, February). How the Internet will help large-scale assessment reinvent itself. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(5). Retrieved July 12, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n5.html

Bennett R. E. , Jenkins F. , Persky H. , and Weiss A. (2003). Assessing complex problem-solving performances. Assessment in Education, 10, 347—359.

Black P. , and Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment and Education, 5(1), 7—74.

Bransford J. D. , Brown A. L. , and Cocking R. B. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Colella V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471—500.

Confrey J. , and Makar K. M. (2005). Critiquing and improving the use of data from high-stakes tests with the aid of dynamic statistics software. In Dede C. , Honan J.P. , and Peters L.C. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based, educational improvement (pp. 198—226). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Crawford V. M. , Schlager M. , Penuel W. R. , and Toyama Y. (in press). Supporting the art of teaching in a data-rich, high performance learning environment. In Mandinach E.B. , and Honey M. (Eds.), Linking data and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cromey A. (2000, November). Using student assessment data: What can we learn from schools? (Policy Issues No. 6). Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Crouch C. H. , and Mazur E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. The Physics Teacher, 69, 970—977.

DeMark S. , and Behrens J. T. (2004). Using statistical natural language processing for understanding complex responses to free-response tasks. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 371—390.

Deming W. E. (1986). Out of crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

Week Education (2006). Technology Counts 2006: A special state-focused supplement to Education Week. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.

Fagan A. P. , Crouch C. H. , and Mazur E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40(4), 206—207.

Feldman J. , and Tung R. (2001). Using data based inquiry and decision-making to improve instruction. ERS Spectrum, 19(3), 10—19.

Hake R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64—74.

Hegedus S. (2003, July). Improving algebraic thinking through a connected SimCalc Mathworlds classroom. Paper presented at the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of the PME-NA, Honolulu, HI.

Hegedus S. , and Kaput J. (2004, September). An introduction to the profound potential of connected algebra activities: Issues of representation, engagement and pedagogy. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.

Herman J. , and Gribbons B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Education.

Levy R. , and Mislevy R. J. (2004). Specifying and refining a measurement model for a computer-based interaction assessment. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 333—369.

Light D. , Wexler D. , and Heinze J. (2004, April). How practitioners interpret and link data to instruction: Research findings on New York City schools' implementation of the Grow Network. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Linn M. C. , Lee H. S. , Tinker R. , Husic F. , and Chiu J. L. (2006). Supporting online material for teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049—1050.

Lonsdale P , Baber C. , and Sharples M. (2004, September). Engaging learners with everyday technology: A participatory simulation using mobile phones. Paper presented at the Mobile Human Computer Interaction 2004: 6th International Symposium, Glasgow, UK.

Marsh J. A. , Pane J. F. , and Hamilton L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Mason S. (2002, April). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Mazur E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Means B. (2006). Prospects for transforming schools with technology-supported assessment. In and and Sawyer R.K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 505—521). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Means B. , and Haertel G. D. (Eds.). (2003). Evaluating educational technology: Effective research designs for improving learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

Minstrell J. (2001). Facets of students' thinking: Designing to cross the gap from research to standards-based practice. In Crowley K. , Schunn C.D. , and Okada T. (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 415—443). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Minstrell J. (2003). Facets of learning. Seattle, WA: FACETS Innovations.

Mislevy R. , Hamel L. , Fried R. G. , Gaffney T. , Haertel G. , and Hafter A. et al . (2003). Design patterns for assessing science inquiry (PADI Technical Report 1). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2005). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2003 (NCES 2005-015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Paek P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies (PEM Research Report 05-05). Iowa City, IA: Pearson Educational Measurement.

Pellegrino J. W. , Chudowsky N. , and Glaser R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Penuel W. R. , and Riel M. (in press). The new science of networks and the challenge of school change. Phi Delta Kappan.

Popham W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Quellmalz E. S. , and Haertel G. D. (2005). Use of technology-supported tools for large scale science assessment: Implications for assessment practice and policy at the state level. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Quellmalz E. S. , and Kozma R. (2003). Designing assessments of learning with technology. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 389—407.

Quellmalz E. S. , DeBarger A. H. , Haertel G. D. , Schank P. , Buckley B. , and Gobert J. et al . (2005, November). Exploring the role of technology-based simulations in science assessment: The Calipers Project. Paper presented at the annual meeting. of the National Science Teachers Association, Chicago, IL.

Roschelle J. , Penuel W. R. , and Abrahamson A. L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50—54.

Roselli R. J. , and Brophy S. (2002, June). Exploring an electronic polling system for the assessment of student progress in two biomedical engineering courses. Paper presented at the annual conference and exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec.

Russell M. , Goldberg A. , and O'Connor K. (2003). Computer-based testing and validity: A look back into the future. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice, 10(3), 279—293.

Salpeter J. (2004, March). Data: Mining with a mission. Technology & Learning, 24(8), p. 30. Retrieved August 27, 2007 from http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=18311595.

Schmoker M. , and Wilson R. B. (1995). Results: The key to renewal. Educational Leadership, 51(1), 64—65.

Seibert G. , Hamel L. , Haynie K. , Mislevy R. , and Bao H. (2006). Mystery powders: An application of the PADI design system using the four-process delivery system (Draft PADI Technical Report 15). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Shulman L. S. (2007, January/February). Counting and recounting: Assessment and the quest for accountability. Change. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/change/sub.asp?key=97&subkey=2169

Snipes J. , Doolittle F. , and Herlihy C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: MDRC and the Council of Great City Schools.

Sokoloff D. R. , and Thornton R. K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. In Redish E.F. , and Rigden J.S. (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of ICUPE (pp. 1061—1074). College Park, MD: The American Institute of Physics.

Thorn C. A. (2002, April). Data use in the classroom: The challenges of implementing data-based decision-making at the school level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

U.S. Department of Education (2002, September 24). Internet access in U.S. public schools up for seventh straight year. Press release. Retrieved May 27, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2002/09/09242002b.html

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today's students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington, DC: Author.

Wayman J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-based decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 295—308.

Wayman J. C. , and Stringfield S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549—571.

Wayman J. C. , Stringfield S. , and Yakimowski M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through analysis of student data (Report No. 67). Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.

Wilensky U. , and Stroup W. M. (2000, June). Networked gridlock: Students enacting complex dynamic phenomena with the HubNet architecture. Paper presented at the fourth annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor. MI.

Williamson O. M. , Bauer M. , Steinberg L. S. , Mislevy R. J. , and Behrens J. T. (2004). Design rationale for a complex performance assessment. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 303—332.