Teacher Education and Technology: Initial Results from the “What Works and Why” Project

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (1998). Best practice: Innovative use of technology award (Press release). Washington, DC: Author.

Baker E. , and Herman J. L. (2000). Technology and evaluation. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, Los Angeles.

Barker B. O. , Helm V. , and Taylor D. R. (1995). Reforming teacher education through the integration of advanced technologies: Case study report of a college model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington, DC (ERIC document reproduction Service No. ED 379 274).

Bransford J. D. , Brown A. L. , Cocking R. R. , Donovan S. , and Pellegrino J. W. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Campus Computing Project (2001). eCommerce comes slowly to the campus. Claremont, CA: Campus Computing Project. Retrieved April 12, 2007, from http://www.campuscomputing.net/pdf/2001-CCP.pdf().

Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.

Carney K. E. , Oney B. , Goldman S. R. , and Pellegrino J. W. (2004, November). Interpreting the How People Learn framework: What lies in the overlaps? Working paper. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.

Cochran-Smith M. , and Zeichner K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cognition and Technology Group At Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In Berliner D.C. , and Calfee R.C. (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807—840). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Curry School of Education (1997). The Curry School technology strand. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Darling-Hammond L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1

Duran M. (2000). Examination of technology integration into an elementary teacher education program: One university's experience. Unpublished dissertation, Ohio University. Athens, OH.

Education Week (2007, March 29). Technology Counts 2007: A digital decade [Special report].

Fuchs L. S. , Fuchs D. , Hamlett C. L. , and Stecker P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617—641.

Fulton K. , Glenn A. , and Valdez G. (2003). Three preservice programs preparing teachers to use technology: A study in partnerships. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

Glenn A. , Reed R. , and Rhodes E. (2001). Purdue University P3T3 Grant, Year 1: Report of the external evaluation team. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. Retrieved May 13, 2007, from http://p3t3.soe.purdue.edu/ExternalYear1.pdf

Goldman S. R. , Lawless K. , Pellegrino J. W. , and Plants R. (2005/06). Technology for teaching and learning with understanding. In and and Cooper J.M. (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (8th ed., pp. 185—234). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Grossman P. L. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In Cochran-Smith M. , and Zeichner K. (Eds.), Review of research in teacher education (pp. 425—476). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Haertel G. D. , and Means B. (2003). Evaluating educational technology: Effective research designs for improving learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hunt E. , and Minstrell J. (1994). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In and and McGilly K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51—74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hurst K. C. , Casillas A. M. , and Stevens R. H. (1997). Exploring the dynamics of complex problem-solving with artificial neural network-based assessment systems. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 387). Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Kennedy M. (1999). The problem of evidence in teacher education. In and and Roth R. (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 87—107). Philadelphia: Falmer.

Landauer T. K. , Foltz P. W. , and Laham D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259—284.

Levine A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Princeton, NJ: Education Schools Project.

Linn M. C. , and Hsi S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mergendoller J. R. , Johnston J. , Rockman S. , and Willis J. (1994). Exemplary approaches to training teachers to use technology, vol. 1: Case studies. Washington, DC; Novato, CA: Office of Technology Assessment; Beryl Buck Institute for Education.

Moursund D. G. , and Bielefeldt T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.

Pellegrino J. W. , and Altman E. A. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 92—93.

Pellegrino J. W. , Chudowsky N. , and Glaser R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Persichitte K. A. , Tharp D. D. , and Caffarella E. P. (1997). The use of technology by schools, colleges, and departments of education 1996. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

Prensky M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1—6.

Russell M. , Bebell D. , O'Dwyer L. , and O'Connor K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297—310.

Scardamalia M. , Bereiter C. , and Lamon M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In and and McGilly K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201—228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Talbert J. E. , and McLaughlin M. W. (1993). Understanding teaching in context. In Cohen D.K. , McLaughlin M.W. , and Talbert J.E. (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 167—206). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1995, April). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. OTA-EHR-616. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Vermillion J. , Young M. , and Hanafin R. (2007). An academic technology initiative for teacher preparation candidates: Implications for preservice teacher programs. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(3), 99—104.

Yin R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.