BarabS., ThomasM., DodgeT., CarteauxR., and TuzanH. (2004). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(1), 86—108.
2.
BarabS. A., and PluckerJ. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165—182.
3.
BrownJ. S., CollinsA., and DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32—42.
4.
RoundtableBusiness. (2005). Tapping America's potential: The education for innovation initiative. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Business–Higher Education Forum. (2005). A commitment to America's future: Responding to the crisis in mathematics & science education. Washington, DC: Author.
6.
ClarkeJ., DedeC., and DieterleE. (in press). Emerging technologies for collaborative, mediated, immersive learning. In VoogtJ., and KnezekG. (Eds.), The international handbook of technology in education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
ClarkeJ., DedeC., KetelhutD., NelsonB., and BowmanC. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology, 46(3), 27—36.
8.
Computing Research Association (CRA). (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for education and learning for the future: A vision and research agenda. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
DabbaghN. (2006). Select instructional models/Theories to develop instructional prototypes. Instructional Design Knowledge Base, Graduate School of Education, George Mason University. Retrieved August 6, 2006 from http://classweb.gmu.edu/ndabbagh/Resources/IDKB/models_theories.htm
10.
DedeC. (1990). Futures research and strategic planning in teacher education. In and and HoustonR. (Ed.), Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 83—100). New York: Macmillan.
11.
DedeC. (1992, July). Education in the 21st century. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science, 522, 104—115.
12.
DedeC. (2005). Planning for “neomillennial” learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In OblingerJ., and OblingerD. (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 226—247). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Publishers.
13.
DedeC. (in press-a). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In VoogtJ., and KnezekG. (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in education. New York: Springer.
14.
DedeC. (in press-b). The role of information and communications technologies in the evolution of graduate education. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
15.
DedeC. (in press-c). Reconceptualizing 21st century skills. Raleigh, NC: The Friday Institute, North Carolina State University.
16.
DedeC., KorteS., NelsonR., ValdezG., and WardD. (2005). Transforming education for the 21st century: An economic imperative. Chicago, IL: Learning Point Associates.
17.
DieterleE., DedeC., and SchrierK. (2007). “Neomillennial” learning styles propagated by wireless handheld devices. In LytrasM., and NaeveA. (Eds.), Ubiquitous and pervasive knowledge and learning management: Semantics, social networking and new media to their full potential (pp. 35—66). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
18.
DuffyT. M., and CunninghamD. J. (1996). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?Educational Technology, 31, 7—12.
19.
EdelsonD. C., PeaR. D., and GomezL. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In and and WilsonB.G. (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in educational technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
20.
EngeströmY., and MiddletonD. (Eds.). (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
FriedmanT. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
22.
GreenoJ. G.the Middle-school Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 85—126.
23.
GriffinM. M., and GriffinB. W. (1996). Situated cognition and cognitive style: Effects on students' learning as measured by conventional tests and performance assessments. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(4), 293—308.
24.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
JonassenD. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
26.
KafaiY. B., and ChingC. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students' science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323—363.
27.
KirschnerP. A., SwellerJ., and ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75—86.
28.
KlopferE., and SquireK. (in press). Environmental detectives: The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development.
29.
KlopferE., YoonS., and RivasL. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for participatory simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 347—359.
30.
KrajcikJ. S., and BlumenfeldP. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In and and SawyerR.K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, (pp. 317—333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LaveJ., and WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LenhartA., MaddenM., and HitlinP. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
33.
LevyF., and MurnaneR. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
MitchellW. J. (2003). Me ++: The cyborg self and the networked city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
NaisbittJ., and AburdeneP. (1990). Megatrends 2000. New York: William Morrow.
36.
National Academy of Science. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
National Research Council. (2000). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. In BransfordJ.D., BrownA., and CockingR. (Eds.), How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (pp. 6—8). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
38.
National Research Council. (2005). Committee on How People Learn, a targeted report for teachers. In DonovanM.S., and BransfordJ.D. (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 231—235). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
39.
National Science Foundation Cyberinfrastructure Council. (2006). NSF's cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery (draft 7.1). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
40.
PearJ. J., and Crone-ToddD.E. (2001). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers & Education, 38(1), 221—231.
41.
PintrichP. R., and SchunkD. (2001). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson.
42.
RheingoldH. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
43.
RobertsD. F., FoehrU. G., and RideoutV. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
44.
SalomonG. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SchwartzP. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday Currancy.
46.
SimpsonT. L. (2002). Dare I oppose constructivist theory?The Educational Forum, 66(4), 347—354.
47.
VanLehnK., LynchC., SchulzeK., ShapiroJ. A., ShelbyR., and TaylorL. et al. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(3), 147—204.
48.
WengerE., McDermottR., and SnyderW. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
49.
WiskeM. S., FranzK. R., and BreitL. (2004). Teaching for understanding with technology. New York: Jossey-Bass.