AchinsteinP. (Ed.). (2005). Scientific evidence: Philosophical theories and applications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BlockN. J., and DworkinG. (1976). The IQ controversy: Critical readings. New York: Pantheon Books.
3.
BrighouseH. (2006). Is evidence enough? Why values and context matter in education policymaking. Education Week, 26(5), 31, 40.
4.
CarnoyM., JacobsenR., MishelL., and RothsteinR. (2005). The charter school dust-up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, and New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
ConnollyT., ArkesH., and HammondK. (Eds.). (2000). Judgment and decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. London: Heath.
7.
EisenhartM., and TowneL. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31—38.
8.
GlymourC. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
HearnshawL. (1979). Cyril Burt, psychologist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
HowsonC. (2000). Evidence and confirmation. In and and Newton-SmithW. (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 108—116). Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
JamesW. (1899/1958). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life's ideals. New York: W.W. Norton.
12.
KaneM. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527—535.
13.
KaplanA. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
14.
KerdemanD., and PhillipsD. C. (1993). Empiricism and the knowledge base of educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 305—313.
15.
LatourB. (1992). One more turn after the social turn. In and and McMullinE. (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 272—294). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
16.
MajoneG. (1989). Evidence, argument & persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
MillerR. W. (1987). Fact and method: Explanation, confirmation and reality in the natural and social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
MostellerF., and BoruchR. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
O'NeillJ. (1998). Rhetoric, science, and philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 28(2), 205—225.
21.
PhillipsD. C. (2000). The expanded social scientist's bestiary. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
22.
PhillipsD. C. (2006a). Muddying the waters: The many purposes of educational inquiry. In ConradC., and SerlinR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 7—21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
PhillipsD. C. (2006b). A guide for the perplexed: Scientific educational research, methodolatry, and the gold versus the platinum standards. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 15—26.
24.
PhillipsD. C., and BurbulesN. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
PlankD., and HarrisD. (2006). Minding the gap between research and policymaking. In ConradC., and SerlinR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 37—51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
PopperK. (1965). Conjectures and refutations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
27.
PopperK. (1972). Objective knowledge. London: Oxford University Press.
28.
PopperK. (1976). The logic of the social sciences. In AdornoT., AlbertH., DahrendorfR., HabermasJ., PilotH., and PopperK. (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 87—104). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
29.
RuseM. (1999). The Darwinian revolution: Science red in tooth and claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
SearleJ. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
31.
ShulmanL. (2005). Seek simplicity. and distrust it. Education Week, 24(39), 36, 48.
32.
SillsD., and MertonR. (Eds.). (2000). Social science quotations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
StoneD. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. Revised Edition. New York: W. W. Norton.
34.
WatsonJ. D. (1968). The double helix. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
35.
WeinbergL. (2006, May). Are race and disability analogous? The philosophy underlying the full inclusion debate and its relationship to empirical research. Unpublished paper presented at the meeting of the California Association for Philosophy of Education, Stanford.