Large-Scale Indicator Assessments: What Every Educational Policymaker Should Know

Braun H. , Qian J. , Vezzu S. , and Bi M. (2007). Mapping the 2005 state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scale. Report under review by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Braun H. , Zhang J. , and Vezzu S. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of a full-population estimation method. Report under review by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Buckendahl C. W. , Smith R. W. , Impara J. C. , and Plake B. S. (2002). A comparison of Angoff and bookmark standard setting methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 253—263.

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Feuer M. J. , Holland P. W. , Green B. F. , Bertenthal M. W. , and Hemphill F. C. (1999). Uncommon measures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Fitzharris L. H. (1993). An historical review of the National Assessment of Educational Progress from 1963 to 1991. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.

Glass G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351—379.

Grigg W. S. , Jin Y. , and Campbell J. R. (2003). The nation's report card: Reading 2002 (NCES Publication No. 2003–2521). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

Hedges L. , and Olkin I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.

Holland P. W. (2002). Two measures of change in the gaps between the CDFs of test score distributions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 3—17.

Johnson E. G. , and Siegendorf A. (1998). Linking the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): Eighth-grade results. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

Jones L. V. , and Olkin I. (2004). The nation's report card. Evolution and perspectives. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Mazzeo J. , Lazer S. , and Zieky M. J. (2006). Monitoring educational progress with group-score assessments. In and and Brennan R.L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 681—699). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

McLaughlin D. (2005). Properties of NAEP full population estimates. Unpublished research memorandum, American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, CA, July.

McLaughlin D. , deMello V. V. , Blakenship C. , Chaney K. , Esra P. , and Hikawa H. . (2007). Comparison between NAEP and state mathematics assessment results: 2003. Report under review by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Messick S. (1989). Validity. In and and Linn R.L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13—103). New York: Macmillan.

Messick S. (1996). Validity of performance assessments. In and and Phillips G.W. (Ed.), Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment (pp. 1—18). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Mislevy R. J. (1995). What can we learn from international assessments? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(4), 419—437.

National Assessment Governing Board (n.d.). NAGB's responsibilities. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.nagb.org/.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

National Assessment of Educational Progress (n.d.). 1996, 2000 mathematics assessment. Computed by the NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.naepdata/.

Perie M. , Grigg W. S. , and Dion G. S. (2005). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Perie M. , Grigg W. S. , and Donahue G. S. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Resnick L. (1999). Reflections on the future of NAEP: Instrument for monitoring or for accountability? Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Schum D. A. (1987). Evidence for the intelligence analyst. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Southern Regional Education Board (2006). Getting state standards right in the early and middle grades. Retrieved January 22, 2007, from http://www.sreb.org/main/goals/Publications/06E19_Getting_State_Standards.pdf.

Wise L. L. (2003). Testing NAEP full population estimates for sensitivity to violation of assumptions–Draft design and management plan (DFR-03-61). Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.